Why aren't people with young onset dementia and their supporters using formal services? Results from the INSPIRED study

Monica Cations, Adrienne Withall, Ruth Horsfall, Nicole Denham, Fiona White, Julian Trollor, Clement Loy, Henry Brodaty, Perminder Sachdev, Peter Gonski, Apo Demirkol, Robert G. Cumming, Brian Draper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite reporting high levels of burden, supporters of people with young onset dementia (YOD) underuse formal community services. Previous quantitative studies in YOD are of limited utility in guiding service design because they did not consider important contextual barriers to service use. The aim of this study was to identify all relevant barriers and describe the service features considered most important to improving uptake by people with YOD and their supporters.

METHODS: Eighty-six people with consensus-confirmed YOD (mean onset age 55.3 years) and/or their primary supporter participated in quantitative interviews, and 50 also participated in one of seven qualitative focus groups. Interview participants reported levels of community service use and reasons for non-use, functional impairment, behavioural and psychological symptoms, supporter burden, social network, and informal care provision. Focus group participants expanded on reasons for non-use and aspects of an ideal service.

RESULTS: Although at least one community service was recommended to most participants (96.8%), 66.7% chose not to use one or more of these. Few of the clinical or demographic factors included here were related to service use. Qualitative analyses identified that lack of perceived need, availability, and YOD-specific barriers (including ineligibility, unaffordability, lack of security, lack of childcare) were commonly reported. Five aspects of an ideal service were noted: unique, flexibile, affordable, tailored, and promoting meaningful engagement.

CONCLUSION: People with YOD and their families report that formal community services do not meet their personal and psychological needs. Researchers can provide ongoing assessment of program feasibility, suitability, and generalisability.

LanguageEnglish
Pagese0180935
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Cations, Monica ; Withall, Adrienne ; Horsfall, Ruth ; Denham, Nicole ; White, Fiona ; Trollor, Julian ; Loy, Clement ; Brodaty, Henry ; Sachdev, Perminder ; Gonski, Peter ; Demirkol, Apo ; Cumming, Robert G. ; Draper, Brian. / Why aren't people with young onset dementia and their supporters using formal services? Results from the INSPIRED study. In: PLoS ONE. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 7. pp. e0180935.
@article{582741ce5ea042c6a3eb51cceb1abc45,
title = "Why aren't people with young onset dementia and their supporters using formal services? Results from the INSPIRED study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite reporting high levels of burden, supporters of people with young onset dementia (YOD) underuse formal community services. Previous quantitative studies in YOD are of limited utility in guiding service design because they did not consider important contextual barriers to service use. The aim of this study was to identify all relevant barriers and describe the service features considered most important to improving uptake by people with YOD and their supporters.METHODS: Eighty-six people with consensus-confirmed YOD (mean onset age 55.3 years) and/or their primary supporter participated in quantitative interviews, and 50 also participated in one of seven qualitative focus groups. Interview participants reported levels of community service use and reasons for non-use, functional impairment, behavioural and psychological symptoms, supporter burden, social network, and informal care provision. Focus group participants expanded on reasons for non-use and aspects of an ideal service.RESULTS: Although at least one community service was recommended to most participants (96.8{\%}), 66.7{\%} chose not to use one or more of these. Few of the clinical or demographic factors included here were related to service use. Qualitative analyses identified that lack of perceived need, availability, and YOD-specific barriers (including ineligibility, unaffordability, lack of security, lack of childcare) were commonly reported. Five aspects of an ideal service were noted: unique, flexibile, affordable, tailored, and promoting meaningful engagement.CONCLUSION: People with YOD and their families report that formal community services do not meet their personal and psychological needs. Researchers can provide ongoing assessment of program feasibility, suitability, and generalisability.",
author = "Monica Cations and Adrienne Withall and Ruth Horsfall and Nicole Denham and Fiona White and Julian Trollor and Clement Loy and Henry Brodaty and Perminder Sachdev and Peter Gonski and Apo Demirkol and Cumming, {Robert G.} and Brian Draper",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0180935",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "e0180935",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

Cations, M, Withall, A, Horsfall, R, Denham, N, White, F, Trollor, J, Loy, C, Brodaty, H, Sachdev, P, Gonski, P, Demirkol, A, Cumming, RG & Draper, B 2017, 'Why aren't people with young onset dementia and their supporters using formal services? Results from the INSPIRED study', PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. e0180935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180935

Why aren't people with young onset dementia and their supporters using formal services? Results from the INSPIRED study. / Cations, Monica; Withall, Adrienne; Horsfall, Ruth; Denham, Nicole; White, Fiona; Trollor, Julian; Loy, Clement; Brodaty, Henry; Sachdev, Perminder; Gonski, Peter; Demirkol, Apo; Cumming, Robert G.; Draper, Brian.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 7, 01.01.2017, p. e0180935.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why aren't people with young onset dementia and their supporters using formal services? Results from the INSPIRED study

AU - Cations, Monica

AU - Withall, Adrienne

AU - Horsfall, Ruth

AU - Denham, Nicole

AU - White, Fiona

AU - Trollor, Julian

AU - Loy, Clement

AU - Brodaty, Henry

AU - Sachdev, Perminder

AU - Gonski, Peter

AU - Demirkol, Apo

AU - Cumming, Robert G.

AU - Draper, Brian

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite reporting high levels of burden, supporters of people with young onset dementia (YOD) underuse formal community services. Previous quantitative studies in YOD are of limited utility in guiding service design because they did not consider important contextual barriers to service use. The aim of this study was to identify all relevant barriers and describe the service features considered most important to improving uptake by people with YOD and their supporters.METHODS: Eighty-six people with consensus-confirmed YOD (mean onset age 55.3 years) and/or their primary supporter participated in quantitative interviews, and 50 also participated in one of seven qualitative focus groups. Interview participants reported levels of community service use and reasons for non-use, functional impairment, behavioural and psychological symptoms, supporter burden, social network, and informal care provision. Focus group participants expanded on reasons for non-use and aspects of an ideal service.RESULTS: Although at least one community service was recommended to most participants (96.8%), 66.7% chose not to use one or more of these. Few of the clinical or demographic factors included here were related to service use. Qualitative analyses identified that lack of perceived need, availability, and YOD-specific barriers (including ineligibility, unaffordability, lack of security, lack of childcare) were commonly reported. Five aspects of an ideal service were noted: unique, flexibile, affordable, tailored, and promoting meaningful engagement.CONCLUSION: People with YOD and their families report that formal community services do not meet their personal and psychological needs. Researchers can provide ongoing assessment of program feasibility, suitability, and generalisability.

AB - BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite reporting high levels of burden, supporters of people with young onset dementia (YOD) underuse formal community services. Previous quantitative studies in YOD are of limited utility in guiding service design because they did not consider important contextual barriers to service use. The aim of this study was to identify all relevant barriers and describe the service features considered most important to improving uptake by people with YOD and their supporters.METHODS: Eighty-six people with consensus-confirmed YOD (mean onset age 55.3 years) and/or their primary supporter participated in quantitative interviews, and 50 also participated in one of seven qualitative focus groups. Interview participants reported levels of community service use and reasons for non-use, functional impairment, behavioural and psychological symptoms, supporter burden, social network, and informal care provision. Focus group participants expanded on reasons for non-use and aspects of an ideal service.RESULTS: Although at least one community service was recommended to most participants (96.8%), 66.7% chose not to use one or more of these. Few of the clinical or demographic factors included here were related to service use. Qualitative analyses identified that lack of perceived need, availability, and YOD-specific barriers (including ineligibility, unaffordability, lack of security, lack of childcare) were commonly reported. Five aspects of an ideal service were noted: unique, flexibile, affordable, tailored, and promoting meaningful engagement.CONCLUSION: People with YOD and their families report that formal community services do not meet their personal and psychological needs. Researchers can provide ongoing assessment of program feasibility, suitability, and generalisability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030430899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180935

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180935

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - e0180935

JO - PLoS ONE

T2 - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

ER -