Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex: A brain stimulation study

Brenton Hordacre, Mitchell Goldsworthy, Ann Maree Vallence, Sam Darvishi, Bahar Moezzi, Masashi Hamada, John C. Rothwell, Michael C. Ridding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for both probing human neuroplasticity and the induction of functionally relevant neuroplastic change has received significant interest. However, at present the utility of NIBS is limited due to high response variability. One reason for this response variability is that NIBS targets a diffuse cortical population and the net outcome to stimulation depends on the relative levels of excitability in each population. There is evidence that the relative excitability of complex oligosynaptic circuits (late I-wave circuits) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is useful in predicting NIBS response. Objective Here we examined whether an additional marker of cortical excitability, MEP amplitude variability, could provide additional insights into response variability following application of the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) NIBS protocol. Additionally we investigated whether I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Methods Thirty-four healthy subjects (15 male, aged 18–35 years) participated in two experiments. Experiment 1 investigated baseline MEP variability and cTBS response. Experiment 2 determined if I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Results Data show that both baseline MEP variability and late I-wave recruitment are associated with cTBS response, but were independent of each other; together, these variables predict 31% of the variability in cTBS response. Conclusions This study provides insight into the physiological mechanisms underpinning NIBS plasticity responses and may facilitate development of more reliable NIBS protocols.

LanguageEnglish
Pages588-595
Number of pages8
JournalBrain Stimulation
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Keywords

  • Motor cortex
  • Motor evoked potential
  • Theta burst stimulation
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Biophysics
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Hordacre, Brenton ; Goldsworthy, Mitchell ; Vallence, Ann Maree ; Darvishi, Sam ; Moezzi, Bahar ; Hamada, Masashi ; Rothwell, John C. ; Ridding, Michael C. / Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex : A brain stimulation study. In: Brain Stimulation. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 588-595.
@article{ea2d7e3c25214e0ba732a2b71a290355,
title = "Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex: A brain stimulation study",
abstract = "Background The potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for both probing human neuroplasticity and the induction of functionally relevant neuroplastic change has received significant interest. However, at present the utility of NIBS is limited due to high response variability. One reason for this response variability is that NIBS targets a diffuse cortical population and the net outcome to stimulation depends on the relative levels of excitability in each population. There is evidence that the relative excitability of complex oligosynaptic circuits (late I-wave circuits) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is useful in predicting NIBS response. Objective Here we examined whether an additional marker of cortical excitability, MEP amplitude variability, could provide additional insights into response variability following application of the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) NIBS protocol. Additionally we investigated whether I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Methods Thirty-four healthy subjects (15 male, aged 18–35 years) participated in two experiments. Experiment 1 investigated baseline MEP variability and cTBS response. Experiment 2 determined if I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Results Data show that both baseline MEP variability and late I-wave recruitment are associated with cTBS response, but were independent of each other; together, these variables predict 31{\%} of the variability in cTBS response. Conclusions This study provides insight into the physiological mechanisms underpinning NIBS plasticity responses and may facilitate development of more reliable NIBS protocols.",
keywords = "Motor cortex, Motor evoked potential, Theta burst stimulation, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Variability",
author = "Brenton Hordacre and Mitchell Goldsworthy and Vallence, {Ann Maree} and Sam Darvishi and Bahar Moezzi and Masashi Hamada and Rothwell, {John C.} and Ridding, {Michael C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "588--595",
journal = "Brain Stimulation",
issn = "1935-861X",
number = "3",

}

Hordacre, B, Goldsworthy, M, Vallence, AM, Darvishi, S, Moezzi, B, Hamada, M, Rothwell, JC & Ridding, MC 2017, 'Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex: A brain stimulation study', Brain Stimulation, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 588-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.001

Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex : A brain stimulation study. / Hordacre, Brenton; Goldsworthy, Mitchell; Vallence, Ann Maree; Darvishi, Sam; Moezzi, Bahar; Hamada, Masashi; Rothwell, John C.; Ridding, Michael C.

In: Brain Stimulation, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 588-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex

T2 - Brain Stimulation

AU - Hordacre, Brenton

AU - Goldsworthy, Mitchell

AU - Vallence, Ann Maree

AU - Darvishi, Sam

AU - Moezzi, Bahar

AU - Hamada, Masashi

AU - Rothwell, John C.

AU - Ridding, Michael C.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Background The potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for both probing human neuroplasticity and the induction of functionally relevant neuroplastic change has received significant interest. However, at present the utility of NIBS is limited due to high response variability. One reason for this response variability is that NIBS targets a diffuse cortical population and the net outcome to stimulation depends on the relative levels of excitability in each population. There is evidence that the relative excitability of complex oligosynaptic circuits (late I-wave circuits) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is useful in predicting NIBS response. Objective Here we examined whether an additional marker of cortical excitability, MEP amplitude variability, could provide additional insights into response variability following application of the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) NIBS protocol. Additionally we investigated whether I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Methods Thirty-four healthy subjects (15 male, aged 18–35 years) participated in two experiments. Experiment 1 investigated baseline MEP variability and cTBS response. Experiment 2 determined if I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Results Data show that both baseline MEP variability and late I-wave recruitment are associated with cTBS response, but were independent of each other; together, these variables predict 31% of the variability in cTBS response. Conclusions This study provides insight into the physiological mechanisms underpinning NIBS plasticity responses and may facilitate development of more reliable NIBS protocols.

AB - Background The potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for both probing human neuroplasticity and the induction of functionally relevant neuroplastic change has received significant interest. However, at present the utility of NIBS is limited due to high response variability. One reason for this response variability is that NIBS targets a diffuse cortical population and the net outcome to stimulation depends on the relative levels of excitability in each population. There is evidence that the relative excitability of complex oligosynaptic circuits (late I-wave circuits) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is useful in predicting NIBS response. Objective Here we examined whether an additional marker of cortical excitability, MEP amplitude variability, could provide additional insights into response variability following application of the continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) NIBS protocol. Additionally we investigated whether I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Methods Thirty-four healthy subjects (15 male, aged 18–35 years) participated in two experiments. Experiment 1 investigated baseline MEP variability and cTBS response. Experiment 2 determined if I-wave recruitment was associated with MEP variability. Results Data show that both baseline MEP variability and late I-wave recruitment are associated with cTBS response, but were independent of each other; together, these variables predict 31% of the variability in cTBS response. Conclusions This study provides insight into the physiological mechanisms underpinning NIBS plasticity responses and may facilitate development of more reliable NIBS protocols.

KW - Motor cortex

KW - Motor evoked potential

KW - Theta burst stimulation

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

KW - Variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009279498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 588

EP - 595

JO - Brain Stimulation

JF - Brain Stimulation

SN - 1935-861X

IS - 3

ER -