Utility of auscultatory screening for detecting rheumatic heart disease in high-risk children in Australia's Northern Territory

Kathryn V. Roberts, Alex Brown, Graeme P. Maguire, David N. Atkinson, Jonathan R. Carapetis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the utility of auscultatory screening for detecting echocardiographically confirmed rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in high-risk children in the Northern Territory, Australia. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey. Setting: Twelve rural and remote communities in the NT between September 2008 and June 2010. Participants: 1015 predominantly Indigenous schoolchildren aged 5-15 years. Intervention: All children underwent transthoracic echocardiography, using a portable cardiovascular ultrasound machine, and cardiac auscultation by a doctor and a nurse. Sonographers and auscultators were blinded to each others' findings and the clinical history of the children. Echocardiograms were reported offsite, using a standardised protocol, by cardiologists who were also blinded to the clinical findings. Main outcome measures: Presence of a cardiac murmur as identified by nurses (any murmur) and doctors (any murmur, and "suspicious" or "pathological" murmurs), compared with echocardiogram findings. RHD was defined according to the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD. Results: Of the 1015 children screened, 34 (3.3%) had abnormalities identified on their echocardiogram; 24 met echocardiographic criteria for definite or borderline RHD, and 10 had isolated congenital anomalies. Detection of any murmur by a nurse had a sensitivity of 47.1%, specificity of 74.8% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 6.1%. Doctor identification of any murmur had 38.2% sensitivity, 75.1% specificity and 5.1% PPV, and the corresponding values for doctor detection of suspicious or pathological murmurs were 20.6%, 92.2% and 8.3%. For all auscultation approaches, negative predictive value was more than 97%, but the majority of participants with cardiac abnormalities were not identified. The results were no different when only definite RHD and congenital abnormalities were considered as true cases. Conclusions: Sensitivity and positive predictive value of cardiac auscultation compared with echocardiography is poor, regardless of the expertise of the auscultator. Although negative predictive value is high, most cases of heart disease were missed by auscultation, suggesting that cardiac auscultation should no longer be used to screen for RHD in high-risk schoolchildren in Australia.

LanguageEnglish
Pages196-199
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume199
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Roberts, Kathryn V. ; Brown, Alex ; Maguire, Graeme P. ; Atkinson, David N. ; Carapetis, Jonathan R. / Utility of auscultatory screening for detecting rheumatic heart disease in high-risk children in Australia's Northern Territory. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 2013 ; Vol. 199, No. 3. pp. 196-199.
@article{832cadac30b248bfbe8edaea40faffcb,
title = "Utility of auscultatory screening for detecting rheumatic heart disease in high-risk children in Australia's Northern Territory",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the utility of auscultatory screening for detecting echocardiographically confirmed rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in high-risk children in the Northern Territory, Australia. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey. Setting: Twelve rural and remote communities in the NT between September 2008 and June 2010. Participants: 1015 predominantly Indigenous schoolchildren aged 5-15 years. Intervention: All children underwent transthoracic echocardiography, using a portable cardiovascular ultrasound machine, and cardiac auscultation by a doctor and a nurse. Sonographers and auscultators were blinded to each others' findings and the clinical history of the children. Echocardiograms were reported offsite, using a standardised protocol, by cardiologists who were also blinded to the clinical findings. Main outcome measures: Presence of a cardiac murmur as identified by nurses (any murmur) and doctors (any murmur, and {"}suspicious{"} or {"}pathological{"} murmurs), compared with echocardiogram findings. RHD was defined according to the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD. Results: Of the 1015 children screened, 34 (3.3{\%}) had abnormalities identified on their echocardiogram; 24 met echocardiographic criteria for definite or borderline RHD, and 10 had isolated congenital anomalies. Detection of any murmur by a nurse had a sensitivity of 47.1{\%}, specificity of 74.8{\%} and positive predictive value (PPV) of 6.1{\%}. Doctor identification of any murmur had 38.2{\%} sensitivity, 75.1{\%} specificity and 5.1{\%} PPV, and the corresponding values for doctor detection of suspicious or pathological murmurs were 20.6{\%}, 92.2{\%} and 8.3{\%}. For all auscultation approaches, negative predictive value was more than 97{\%}, but the majority of participants with cardiac abnormalities were not identified. The results were no different when only definite RHD and congenital abnormalities were considered as true cases. Conclusions: Sensitivity and positive predictive value of cardiac auscultation compared with echocardiography is poor, regardless of the expertise of the auscultator. Although negative predictive value is high, most cases of heart disease were missed by auscultation, suggesting that cardiac auscultation should no longer be used to screen for RHD in high-risk schoolchildren in Australia.",
author = "Roberts, {Kathryn V.} and Alex Brown and Maguire, {Graeme P.} and Atkinson, {David N.} and Carapetis, {Jonathan R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.5694/mja13.10520",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
pages = "196--199",
journal = "The Medical journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Utility of auscultatory screening for detecting rheumatic heart disease in high-risk children in Australia's Northern Territory. / Roberts, Kathryn V.; Brown, Alex; Maguire, Graeme P.; Atkinson, David N.; Carapetis, Jonathan R.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 199, No. 3, 05.08.2013, p. 196-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of auscultatory screening for detecting rheumatic heart disease in high-risk children in Australia's Northern Territory

AU - Roberts, Kathryn V.

AU - Brown, Alex

AU - Maguire, Graeme P.

AU - Atkinson, David N.

AU - Carapetis, Jonathan R.

PY - 2013/8/5

Y1 - 2013/8/5

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the utility of auscultatory screening for detecting echocardiographically confirmed rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in high-risk children in the Northern Territory, Australia. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey. Setting: Twelve rural and remote communities in the NT between September 2008 and June 2010. Participants: 1015 predominantly Indigenous schoolchildren aged 5-15 years. Intervention: All children underwent transthoracic echocardiography, using a portable cardiovascular ultrasound machine, and cardiac auscultation by a doctor and a nurse. Sonographers and auscultators were blinded to each others' findings and the clinical history of the children. Echocardiograms were reported offsite, using a standardised protocol, by cardiologists who were also blinded to the clinical findings. Main outcome measures: Presence of a cardiac murmur as identified by nurses (any murmur) and doctors (any murmur, and "suspicious" or "pathological" murmurs), compared with echocardiogram findings. RHD was defined according to the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD. Results: Of the 1015 children screened, 34 (3.3%) had abnormalities identified on their echocardiogram; 24 met echocardiographic criteria for definite or borderline RHD, and 10 had isolated congenital anomalies. Detection of any murmur by a nurse had a sensitivity of 47.1%, specificity of 74.8% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 6.1%. Doctor identification of any murmur had 38.2% sensitivity, 75.1% specificity and 5.1% PPV, and the corresponding values for doctor detection of suspicious or pathological murmurs were 20.6%, 92.2% and 8.3%. For all auscultation approaches, negative predictive value was more than 97%, but the majority of participants with cardiac abnormalities were not identified. The results were no different when only definite RHD and congenital abnormalities were considered as true cases. Conclusions: Sensitivity and positive predictive value of cardiac auscultation compared with echocardiography is poor, regardless of the expertise of the auscultator. Although negative predictive value is high, most cases of heart disease were missed by auscultation, suggesting that cardiac auscultation should no longer be used to screen for RHD in high-risk schoolchildren in Australia.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the utility of auscultatory screening for detecting echocardiographically confirmed rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in high-risk children in the Northern Territory, Australia. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey. Setting: Twelve rural and remote communities in the NT between September 2008 and June 2010. Participants: 1015 predominantly Indigenous schoolchildren aged 5-15 years. Intervention: All children underwent transthoracic echocardiography, using a portable cardiovascular ultrasound machine, and cardiac auscultation by a doctor and a nurse. Sonographers and auscultators were blinded to each others' findings and the clinical history of the children. Echocardiograms were reported offsite, using a standardised protocol, by cardiologists who were also blinded to the clinical findings. Main outcome measures: Presence of a cardiac murmur as identified by nurses (any murmur) and doctors (any murmur, and "suspicious" or "pathological" murmurs), compared with echocardiogram findings. RHD was defined according to the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD. Results: Of the 1015 children screened, 34 (3.3%) had abnormalities identified on their echocardiogram; 24 met echocardiographic criteria for definite or borderline RHD, and 10 had isolated congenital anomalies. Detection of any murmur by a nurse had a sensitivity of 47.1%, specificity of 74.8% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 6.1%. Doctor identification of any murmur had 38.2% sensitivity, 75.1% specificity and 5.1% PPV, and the corresponding values for doctor detection of suspicious or pathological murmurs were 20.6%, 92.2% and 8.3%. For all auscultation approaches, negative predictive value was more than 97%, but the majority of participants with cardiac abnormalities were not identified. The results were no different when only definite RHD and congenital abnormalities were considered as true cases. Conclusions: Sensitivity and positive predictive value of cardiac auscultation compared with echocardiography is poor, regardless of the expertise of the auscultator. Although negative predictive value is high, most cases of heart disease were missed by auscultation, suggesting that cardiac auscultation should no longer be used to screen for RHD in high-risk schoolchildren in Australia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881273114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja13.10520

DO - 10.5694/mja13.10520

M3 - Article

VL - 199

SP - 196

EP - 199

JO - The Medical journal of Australia

T2 - The Medical journal of Australia

JF - The Medical journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 3

ER -