Using prognostic models in clinical infertility

Ben W J Mol, Madelon Van Wely, Ewout W. Steyerberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The chance that a couple who have tried to conceive for 12 months will succeed without assisted conception treatment is still higher than the chance that the same couple will benefit from treatment. In this context, it is important to assess the chance that a treatment-independent or 'spontaneous' pregnancy will occur in a couple whose wish for a child is unfulfilled. Prognostic models can be useful in this assessment. In recent years, prognostic models have been published both for the occurrence of 'spontaneous' pregnancy and for pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. This article discusses the theoretical aspects of prognostic modelling and assesses whether the current prognostic models are good enough to justify their use in clinical practice. The performance of existing models for the prediction of spontaneous conception was found to be acceptable on internal as well as on external validation. However, the performance of the existing models predicting IVF outcome was found to be disappointing on the few occasions on which such external validation has been performed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages199-202
Number of pages4
JournalHuman Fertility
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Mol, B. W. J., Van Wely, M., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2000). Using prognostic models in clinical infertility. Human Fertility, 3(3), 199-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727002000198981
Mol, Ben W J ; Van Wely, Madelon ; Steyerberg, Ewout W. / Using prognostic models in clinical infertility. In: Human Fertility. 2000 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 199-202.
@article{b3eb794c550e420ebad2e9393c2bbb20,
title = "Using prognostic models in clinical infertility",
abstract = "The chance that a couple who have tried to conceive for 12 months will succeed without assisted conception treatment is still higher than the chance that the same couple will benefit from treatment. In this context, it is important to assess the chance that a treatment-independent or 'spontaneous' pregnancy will occur in a couple whose wish for a child is unfulfilled. Prognostic models can be useful in this assessment. In recent years, prognostic models have been published both for the occurrence of 'spontaneous' pregnancy and for pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. This article discusses the theoretical aspects of prognostic modelling and assesses whether the current prognostic models are good enough to justify their use in clinical practice. The performance of existing models for the prediction of spontaneous conception was found to be acceptable on internal as well as on external validation. However, the performance of the existing models predicting IVF outcome was found to be disappointing on the few occasions on which such external validation has been performed.",
author = "Mol, {Ben W J} and {Van Wely}, Madelon and Steyerberg, {Ewout W.}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/1464727002000198981",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "199--202",
journal = "Human Fertility",
issn = "1464-7273",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

Mol, BWJ, Van Wely, M & Steyerberg, EW 2000, 'Using prognostic models in clinical infertility', Human Fertility, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 199-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727002000198981

Using prognostic models in clinical infertility. / Mol, Ben W J; Van Wely, Madelon; Steyerberg, Ewout W.

In: Human Fertility, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2000, p. 199-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using prognostic models in clinical infertility

AU - Mol, Ben W J

AU - Van Wely, Madelon

AU - Steyerberg, Ewout W.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The chance that a couple who have tried to conceive for 12 months will succeed without assisted conception treatment is still higher than the chance that the same couple will benefit from treatment. In this context, it is important to assess the chance that a treatment-independent or 'spontaneous' pregnancy will occur in a couple whose wish for a child is unfulfilled. Prognostic models can be useful in this assessment. In recent years, prognostic models have been published both for the occurrence of 'spontaneous' pregnancy and for pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. This article discusses the theoretical aspects of prognostic modelling and assesses whether the current prognostic models are good enough to justify their use in clinical practice. The performance of existing models for the prediction of spontaneous conception was found to be acceptable on internal as well as on external validation. However, the performance of the existing models predicting IVF outcome was found to be disappointing on the few occasions on which such external validation has been performed.

AB - The chance that a couple who have tried to conceive for 12 months will succeed without assisted conception treatment is still higher than the chance that the same couple will benefit from treatment. In this context, it is important to assess the chance that a treatment-independent or 'spontaneous' pregnancy will occur in a couple whose wish for a child is unfulfilled. Prognostic models can be useful in this assessment. In recent years, prognostic models have been published both for the occurrence of 'spontaneous' pregnancy and for pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. This article discusses the theoretical aspects of prognostic modelling and assesses whether the current prognostic models are good enough to justify their use in clinical practice. The performance of existing models for the prediction of spontaneous conception was found to be acceptable on internal as well as on external validation. However, the performance of the existing models predicting IVF outcome was found to be disappointing on the few occasions on which such external validation has been performed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033856787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1464727002000198981

DO - 10.1080/1464727002000198981

M3 - Review article

VL - 3

SP - 199

EP - 202

JO - Human Fertility

T2 - Human Fertility

JF - Human Fertility

SN - 1464-7273

IS - 3

ER -