Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count

Dave J. Hendriks, Janet Kwee, Ben W J Mol, Egbert R. te Velde, Frank J M Broekmans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate by meta-analysis the predictive capacity of ovarian volume as an ovarian reserve test in comparison to the antral follicle count (AFC). Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Tertiary fertility center. Patient(s): Patients undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Poor ovarian response, nonpregnancy. Result(s): A total of 10 studies were detected reporting on ovarian volume and 17 studies on AFC. Because of heterogeneity among studies, calculation of one summary point estimate for sensitivity and specificity was not meaningful. However, for both tests, summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the outcome measures poor response and nonpregnancy could be estimated and compared. The AFC performed statistically significantly better than ovarian volume in the prediction of poor response. The overall accuracy for predicting nonpregnancy was poor for both tests. The clinical value in poor response prediction was only evident for the AFC as a considerable number of cases can be identified who will have a high chance of producing a poor response to stimulation. The clinical value for nonpregnancy was virtually absent for both tests. Conclusion(s): In conclusion, the predictive performance of ovarian volume toward poor response is clearly inferior compared with that of AFC. Therefore, the AFC may be considered the test of first choice when estimating quantitative ovarian reserve before IVF. For the prediction of cases with a very low chance for pregnancy, ovarian reserve testing with the use of ultrasound appears inadequate.

LanguageEnglish
Pages764-775
Number of pages12
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume87
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2007

Keywords

  • Antral follicle count
  • IVF
  • meta-analysis
  • ovarian volume
  • poor response
  • pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Hendriks, Dave J. ; Kwee, Janet ; Mol, Ben W J ; te Velde, Egbert R. ; Broekmans, Frank J M. / Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients : a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2007 ; Vol. 87, No. 4. pp. 764-775.
@article{99fa8dc2f0784793b0aaf1e0d2af0cdf,
title = "Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate by meta-analysis the predictive capacity of ovarian volume as an ovarian reserve test in comparison to the antral follicle count (AFC). Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Tertiary fertility center. Patient(s): Patients undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Poor ovarian response, nonpregnancy. Result(s): A total of 10 studies were detected reporting on ovarian volume and 17 studies on AFC. Because of heterogeneity among studies, calculation of one summary point estimate for sensitivity and specificity was not meaningful. However, for both tests, summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the outcome measures poor response and nonpregnancy could be estimated and compared. The AFC performed statistically significantly better than ovarian volume in the prediction of poor response. The overall accuracy for predicting nonpregnancy was poor for both tests. The clinical value in poor response prediction was only evident for the AFC as a considerable number of cases can be identified who will have a high chance of producing a poor response to stimulation. The clinical value for nonpregnancy was virtually absent for both tests. Conclusion(s): In conclusion, the predictive performance of ovarian volume toward poor response is clearly inferior compared with that of AFC. Therefore, the AFC may be considered the test of first choice when estimating quantitative ovarian reserve before IVF. For the prediction of cases with a very low chance for pregnancy, ovarian reserve testing with the use of ultrasound appears inadequate.",
keywords = "Antral follicle count, IVF, meta-analysis, ovarian volume, poor response, pregnancy",
author = "Hendriks, {Dave J.} and Janet Kwee and Mol, {Ben W J} and {te Velde}, {Egbert R.} and Broekmans, {Frank J M}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.006",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "764--775",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients : a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. / Hendriks, Dave J.; Kwee, Janet; Mol, Ben W J; te Velde, Egbert R.; Broekmans, Frank J M.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 87, No. 4, 04.2007, p. 764-775.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients

T2 - Fertility and Sterility

AU - Hendriks, Dave J.

AU - Kwee, Janet

AU - Mol, Ben W J

AU - te Velde, Egbert R.

AU - Broekmans, Frank J M

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Objective: To investigate by meta-analysis the predictive capacity of ovarian volume as an ovarian reserve test in comparison to the antral follicle count (AFC). Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Tertiary fertility center. Patient(s): Patients undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Poor ovarian response, nonpregnancy. Result(s): A total of 10 studies were detected reporting on ovarian volume and 17 studies on AFC. Because of heterogeneity among studies, calculation of one summary point estimate for sensitivity and specificity was not meaningful. However, for both tests, summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the outcome measures poor response and nonpregnancy could be estimated and compared. The AFC performed statistically significantly better than ovarian volume in the prediction of poor response. The overall accuracy for predicting nonpregnancy was poor for both tests. The clinical value in poor response prediction was only evident for the AFC as a considerable number of cases can be identified who will have a high chance of producing a poor response to stimulation. The clinical value for nonpregnancy was virtually absent for both tests. Conclusion(s): In conclusion, the predictive performance of ovarian volume toward poor response is clearly inferior compared with that of AFC. Therefore, the AFC may be considered the test of first choice when estimating quantitative ovarian reserve before IVF. For the prediction of cases with a very low chance for pregnancy, ovarian reserve testing with the use of ultrasound appears inadequate.

AB - Objective: To investigate by meta-analysis the predictive capacity of ovarian volume as an ovarian reserve test in comparison to the antral follicle count (AFC). Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Tertiary fertility center. Patient(s): Patients undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Poor ovarian response, nonpregnancy. Result(s): A total of 10 studies were detected reporting on ovarian volume and 17 studies on AFC. Because of heterogeneity among studies, calculation of one summary point estimate for sensitivity and specificity was not meaningful. However, for both tests, summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the outcome measures poor response and nonpregnancy could be estimated and compared. The AFC performed statistically significantly better than ovarian volume in the prediction of poor response. The overall accuracy for predicting nonpregnancy was poor for both tests. The clinical value in poor response prediction was only evident for the AFC as a considerable number of cases can be identified who will have a high chance of producing a poor response to stimulation. The clinical value for nonpregnancy was virtually absent for both tests. Conclusion(s): In conclusion, the predictive performance of ovarian volume toward poor response is clearly inferior compared with that of AFC. Therefore, the AFC may be considered the test of first choice when estimating quantitative ovarian reserve before IVF. For the prediction of cases with a very low chance for pregnancy, ovarian reserve testing with the use of ultrasound appears inadequate.

KW - Antral follicle count

KW - IVF

KW - meta-analysis

KW - ovarian volume

KW - poor response

KW - pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047258840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.006

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 764

EP - 775

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 4

ER -