Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty: Higher risk for revision compared with other uncemented cup designs in a ­collaborative register study including 93,709 hips

Inari Laaksonen, Michelle Lorimer, Kirill Gromov, Antti Eskelinen, Ola Rolfson, Stephen E. Graves, Henrik Malchau, Maziar Mohaddes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose — Trabecular metal (TM) cups have demonstrated favorable results in acetabular revision and their use in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some evidence show that TM cups might decrease periprosthetic infection (PPI) incidence. We compared the survivorship of TM cups with that of other uncemented cups in primary THA, and evaluated whether the use of TM cups is associated with a lower risk of PPI. Patients and methods — 10,113 primary THAs with TM cup and 85,596 THAs with other uncemented cups from 2 high-quality national arthroplasty registries were included. The mean follow-up times were 3.0 years for the TM cups and 3.8 years for the other uncemented cups. Results — The overall survivorship up to 8 years for TM cups and other uncemented cups was 94.4% and 96.2%, respectively (p = < 0.001). Adjusting for relevant covariates in a Cox regression model the TM cups had a persistently higher revision risk than other uncemented cups (HR =1.5, 95% CI 1.4–1.7, p = < 0.001). There was a slightly higher, though not statistically significant, revision rate for PPI in the TM group (1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.6, p = 0.09). Interpretation — Risk of revision for any reason was higher for the TM cup than for other uncemented cups in primary THA. In contrast to our hypothesis, there was no evidence that the revision rate for PPI was lower in the TM cup patients. Regardless of the promising early and mid-term results for TM cups in hip revision arthroplasty, we would like to sound a note of caution on the increasing use of the TM design, especially in uncomplicated primary THAs, where uncemented titanium cups are considered to provide a reliable outcome.

LanguageEnglish
Pages259-264
Number of pages6
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Volume89
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Laaksonen, Inari ; Lorimer, Michelle ; Gromov, Kirill ; Eskelinen, Antti ; Rolfson, Ola ; Graves, Stephen E. ; Malchau, Henrik ; Mohaddes, Maziar. / Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty : Higher risk for revision compared with other uncemented cup designs in a ­collaborative register study including 93,709 hips. In: Acta Orthopaedica. 2018 ; Vol. 89, No. 3. pp. 259-264.
@article{78590e19915446da90cfa8dfb29d7018,
title = "Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty: Higher risk for revision compared with other uncemented cup designs in a ­collaborative register study including 93,709 hips",
abstract = "Background and purpose — Trabecular metal (TM) cups have demonstrated favorable results in acetabular revision and their use in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some evidence show that TM cups might decrease periprosthetic infection (PPI) incidence. We compared the survivorship of TM cups with that of other uncemented cups in primary THA, and evaluated whether the use of TM cups is associated with a lower risk of PPI. Patients and methods — 10,113 primary THAs with TM cup and 85,596 THAs with other uncemented cups from 2 high-quality national arthroplasty registries were included. The mean follow-up times were 3.0 years for the TM cups and 3.8 years for the other uncemented cups. Results — The overall survivorship up to 8 years for TM cups and other uncemented cups was 94.4{\%} and 96.2{\%}, respectively (p = < 0.001). Adjusting for relevant covariates in a Cox regression model the TM cups had a persistently higher revision risk than other uncemented cups (HR =1.5, 95{\%} CI 1.4–1.7, p = < 0.001). There was a slightly higher, though not statistically significant, revision rate for PPI in the TM group (1.2, 95{\%} CI 1.0–1.6, p = 0.09). Interpretation — Risk of revision for any reason was higher for the TM cup than for other uncemented cups in primary THA. In contrast to our hypothesis, there was no evidence that the revision rate for PPI was lower in the TM cup patients. Regardless of the promising early and mid-term results for TM cups in hip revision arthroplasty, we would like to sound a note of caution on the increasing use of the TM design, especially in uncomplicated primary THAs, where uncemented titanium cups are considered to provide a reliable outcome.",
author = "Inari Laaksonen and Michelle Lorimer and Kirill Gromov and Antti Eskelinen and Ola Rolfson and Graves, {Stephen E.} and Henrik Malchau and Maziar Mohaddes",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/17453674.2018.1431445",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "259--264",
journal = "Acta Orthopaedica",
issn = "1745-3674",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty : Higher risk for revision compared with other uncemented cup designs in a ­collaborative register study including 93,709 hips. / Laaksonen, Inari; Lorimer, Michelle; Gromov, Kirill; Eskelinen, Antti; Rolfson, Ola; Graves, Stephen E.; Malchau, Henrik; Mohaddes, Maziar.

In: Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 89, No. 3, 04.05.2018, p. 259-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty

T2 - Acta Orthopaedica

AU - Laaksonen, Inari

AU - Lorimer, Michelle

AU - Gromov, Kirill

AU - Eskelinen, Antti

AU - Rolfson, Ola

AU - Graves, Stephen E.

AU - Malchau, Henrik

AU - Mohaddes, Maziar

PY - 2018/5/4

Y1 - 2018/5/4

N2 - Background and purpose — Trabecular metal (TM) cups have demonstrated favorable results in acetabular revision and their use in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some evidence show that TM cups might decrease periprosthetic infection (PPI) incidence. We compared the survivorship of TM cups with that of other uncemented cups in primary THA, and evaluated whether the use of TM cups is associated with a lower risk of PPI. Patients and methods — 10,113 primary THAs with TM cup and 85,596 THAs with other uncemented cups from 2 high-quality national arthroplasty registries were included. The mean follow-up times were 3.0 years for the TM cups and 3.8 years for the other uncemented cups. Results — The overall survivorship up to 8 years for TM cups and other uncemented cups was 94.4% and 96.2%, respectively (p = < 0.001). Adjusting for relevant covariates in a Cox regression model the TM cups had a persistently higher revision risk than other uncemented cups (HR =1.5, 95% CI 1.4–1.7, p = < 0.001). There was a slightly higher, though not statistically significant, revision rate for PPI in the TM group (1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.6, p = 0.09). Interpretation — Risk of revision for any reason was higher for the TM cup than for other uncemented cups in primary THA. In contrast to our hypothesis, there was no evidence that the revision rate for PPI was lower in the TM cup patients. Regardless of the promising early and mid-term results for TM cups in hip revision arthroplasty, we would like to sound a note of caution on the increasing use of the TM design, especially in uncomplicated primary THAs, where uncemented titanium cups are considered to provide a reliable outcome.

AB - Background and purpose — Trabecular metal (TM) cups have demonstrated favorable results in acetabular revision and their use in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some evidence show that TM cups might decrease periprosthetic infection (PPI) incidence. We compared the survivorship of TM cups with that of other uncemented cups in primary THA, and evaluated whether the use of TM cups is associated with a lower risk of PPI. Patients and methods — 10,113 primary THAs with TM cup and 85,596 THAs with other uncemented cups from 2 high-quality national arthroplasty registries were included. The mean follow-up times were 3.0 years for the TM cups and 3.8 years for the other uncemented cups. Results — The overall survivorship up to 8 years for TM cups and other uncemented cups was 94.4% and 96.2%, respectively (p = < 0.001). Adjusting for relevant covariates in a Cox regression model the TM cups had a persistently higher revision risk than other uncemented cups (HR =1.5, 95% CI 1.4–1.7, p = < 0.001). There was a slightly higher, though not statistically significant, revision rate for PPI in the TM group (1.2, 95% CI 1.0–1.6, p = 0.09). Interpretation — Risk of revision for any reason was higher for the TM cup than for other uncemented cups in primary THA. In contrast to our hypothesis, there was no evidence that the revision rate for PPI was lower in the TM cup patients. Regardless of the promising early and mid-term results for TM cups in hip revision arthroplasty, we would like to sound a note of caution on the increasing use of the TM design, especially in uncomplicated primary THAs, where uncemented titanium cups are considered to provide a reliable outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041557690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17453674.2018.1431445

DO - 10.1080/17453674.2018.1431445

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 259

EP - 264

JO - Acta Orthopaedica

JF - Acta Orthopaedica

SN - 1745-3674

IS - 3

ER -