Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: Key concepts and terms

William Runciman, Peter Hibbert, Richard Thomson, Tjerk Van Der Schaaf, Heather Sherman, Pierre Lewalle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

224 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Understanding the patient safety literature has been compromised by the inconsistent use of language. Objectives. To identify key concepts of relevance to the International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS) proposed by the World Alliance For Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (WHO), and agree on definitions and preferred terms. Methods. Six principles were agreed upon - that the concepts and terms should: be applicable across the full spectrum of healthcare; be consistent with concepts from other WHO Classifications; have meanings as close as possible to those in colloquial use; convey the appropriate meanings with respect to patient safety; be brief and clear, without unnecessary or redundant qualifiers; be fit-for-purpose for the ICPS. Results. Definitions and preferred terms were agreed for 48 concepts of relevance to the ICPS; these were described and the relationships between them and the ICPS were outlined. Conclusions. The consistent use of key concepts, definitions and preferred terms should pave the way for better understanding, for comparisons between facilities and jurisdictions, and for trends to be tracked over time. Changes and improvements, translation into other languages and alignment with other sets of patient safety definitions will be necessary. This work represents the start of an ongoing process of progressively improving a common international understanding of terms and concepts relevant to patient safety.

LanguageEnglish
Pages18-26
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Classification
  • Concepts
  • Definitions
  • Patient safety
  • Terminology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Runciman, William ; Hibbert, Peter ; Thomson, Richard ; Van Der Schaaf, Tjerk ; Sherman, Heather ; Lewalle, Pierre. / Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety : Key concepts and terms. In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2009 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 18-26.
@article{33ae74fda1894af3b246d9a0e0b68a69,
title = "Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: Key concepts and terms",
abstract = "Background. Understanding the patient safety literature has been compromised by the inconsistent use of language. Objectives. To identify key concepts of relevance to the International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS) proposed by the World Alliance For Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (WHO), and agree on definitions and preferred terms. Methods. Six principles were agreed upon - that the concepts and terms should: be applicable across the full spectrum of healthcare; be consistent with concepts from other WHO Classifications; have meanings as close as possible to those in colloquial use; convey the appropriate meanings with respect to patient safety; be brief and clear, without unnecessary or redundant qualifiers; be fit-for-purpose for the ICPS. Results. Definitions and preferred terms were agreed for 48 concepts of relevance to the ICPS; these were described and the relationships between them and the ICPS were outlined. Conclusions. The consistent use of key concepts, definitions and preferred terms should pave the way for better understanding, for comparisons between facilities and jurisdictions, and for trends to be tracked over time. Changes and improvements, translation into other languages and alignment with other sets of patient safety definitions will be necessary. This work represents the start of an ongoing process of progressively improving a common international understanding of terms and concepts relevant to patient safety.",
keywords = "Classification, Concepts, Definitions, Patient safety, Terminology",
author = "William Runciman and Peter Hibbert and Richard Thomson and {Van Der Schaaf}, Tjerk and Heather Sherman and Pierre Lewalle",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzn057",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "18--26",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety : Key concepts and terms. / Runciman, William; Hibbert, Peter; Thomson, Richard; Van Der Schaaf, Tjerk; Sherman, Heather; Lewalle, Pierre.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 21, No. 1, 02.02.2009, p. 18-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety

T2 - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

AU - Runciman, William

AU - Hibbert, Peter

AU - Thomson, Richard

AU - Van Der Schaaf, Tjerk

AU - Sherman, Heather

AU - Lewalle, Pierre

PY - 2009/2/2

Y1 - 2009/2/2

N2 - Background. Understanding the patient safety literature has been compromised by the inconsistent use of language. Objectives. To identify key concepts of relevance to the International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS) proposed by the World Alliance For Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (WHO), and agree on definitions and preferred terms. Methods. Six principles were agreed upon - that the concepts and terms should: be applicable across the full spectrum of healthcare; be consistent with concepts from other WHO Classifications; have meanings as close as possible to those in colloquial use; convey the appropriate meanings with respect to patient safety; be brief and clear, without unnecessary or redundant qualifiers; be fit-for-purpose for the ICPS. Results. Definitions and preferred terms were agreed for 48 concepts of relevance to the ICPS; these were described and the relationships between them and the ICPS were outlined. Conclusions. The consistent use of key concepts, definitions and preferred terms should pave the way for better understanding, for comparisons between facilities and jurisdictions, and for trends to be tracked over time. Changes and improvements, translation into other languages and alignment with other sets of patient safety definitions will be necessary. This work represents the start of an ongoing process of progressively improving a common international understanding of terms and concepts relevant to patient safety.

AB - Background. Understanding the patient safety literature has been compromised by the inconsistent use of language. Objectives. To identify key concepts of relevance to the International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS) proposed by the World Alliance For Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (WHO), and agree on definitions and preferred terms. Methods. Six principles were agreed upon - that the concepts and terms should: be applicable across the full spectrum of healthcare; be consistent with concepts from other WHO Classifications; have meanings as close as possible to those in colloquial use; convey the appropriate meanings with respect to patient safety; be brief and clear, without unnecessary or redundant qualifiers; be fit-for-purpose for the ICPS. Results. Definitions and preferred terms were agreed for 48 concepts of relevance to the ICPS; these were described and the relationships between them and the ICPS were outlined. Conclusions. The consistent use of key concepts, definitions and preferred terms should pave the way for better understanding, for comparisons between facilities and jurisdictions, and for trends to be tracked over time. Changes and improvements, translation into other languages and alignment with other sets of patient safety definitions will be necessary. This work represents the start of an ongoing process of progressively improving a common international understanding of terms and concepts relevant to patient safety.

KW - Classification

KW - Concepts

KW - Definitions

KW - Patient safety

KW - Terminology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849134223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzn057

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzn057

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 18

EP - 26

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 1

ER -