The methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology: A systematic review

Sylvia M C Vijgen, Brent C. Opmeer, Benwillem J. Mol

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in the field of obstetrics and gynecology published in the last decade. A MEDLINE search was performed to find economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology from the years 1997 through 2009. We included full economic evaluation studies concerning tests or interventions in the field of obstetrics or gynecology. Each included study was evaluated by two reviewers using a quality checklist that was based on international guidelines for medical economic evaluation studies and a checklist used in a previous review. The mean number of quality criteria adhered to was 23 of 30 items, whereas five articles (3%) met all 30 criteria. Compliance was low for the description of the perspective (40%), the completeness of costs looking at the perspective (48%) or time horizon (48%), and reporting of quantities of resources (47%). Furthermore, if no discounting was applied, an explanation was infrequently given (14%). A comparison of study quality to that reported by Smith and Blackmore showed a considerable improvement in the following criteria: presentation perspective (from 19 to 40%), statement of primary outcome measure (from 72 to 81%), completeness costs looking at the time horizon (from 14 to 48%), the presentation of discount rates (from 10 to 54%), details of sensitivity analyses (from 21 to 61%), reporting incremental results (from 17 to 70%), and reporting a summary measure (from 57 to 74%). The quality of economic studies in obstetrics and gynecology has considerably improved in the last decade, but room for further improvement is present.

LanguageEnglish
Pages253-260
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of perinatology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cost-effectiveness
  • economic evaluation
  • gynecology
  • methodological quality
  • obstetrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Vijgen, Sylvia M C ; Opmeer, Brent C. ; Mol, Benwillem J. / The methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology : A systematic review. In: American journal of perinatology. 2013 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 253-260.
@article{a8b44a813ca34fc98819e31c30ca4e89,
title = "The methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology: A systematic review",
abstract = "We evaluated the methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in the field of obstetrics and gynecology published in the last decade. A MEDLINE search was performed to find economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology from the years 1997 through 2009. We included full economic evaluation studies concerning tests or interventions in the field of obstetrics or gynecology. Each included study was evaluated by two reviewers using a quality checklist that was based on international guidelines for medical economic evaluation studies and a checklist used in a previous review. The mean number of quality criteria adhered to was 23 of 30 items, whereas five articles (3{\%}) met all 30 criteria. Compliance was low for the description of the perspective (40{\%}), the completeness of costs looking at the perspective (48{\%}) or time horizon (48{\%}), and reporting of quantities of resources (47{\%}). Furthermore, if no discounting was applied, an explanation was infrequently given (14{\%}). A comparison of study quality to that reported by Smith and Blackmore showed a considerable improvement in the following criteria: presentation perspective (from 19 to 40{\%}), statement of primary outcome measure (from 72 to 81{\%}), completeness costs looking at the time horizon (from 14 to 48{\%}), the presentation of discount rates (from 10 to 54{\%}), details of sensitivity analyses (from 21 to 61{\%}), reporting incremental results (from 17 to 70{\%}), and reporting a summary measure (from 57 to 74{\%}). The quality of economic studies in obstetrics and gynecology has considerably improved in the last decade, but room for further improvement is present.",
keywords = "cost-effectiveness, economic evaluation, gynecology, methodological quality, obstetrics",
author = "Vijgen, {Sylvia M C} and Opmeer, {Brent C.} and Mol, {Benwillem J.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1055/s-0032-1323591",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "253--260",
journal = "American journal of perinatology",
issn = "0735-1631",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "4",

}

The methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology : A systematic review. / Vijgen, Sylvia M C; Opmeer, Brent C.; Mol, Benwillem J.

In: American journal of perinatology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2013, p. 253-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology

T2 - American journal of perinatology

AU - Vijgen, Sylvia M C

AU - Opmeer, Brent C.

AU - Mol, Benwillem J.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We evaluated the methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in the field of obstetrics and gynecology published in the last decade. A MEDLINE search was performed to find economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology from the years 1997 through 2009. We included full economic evaluation studies concerning tests or interventions in the field of obstetrics or gynecology. Each included study was evaluated by two reviewers using a quality checklist that was based on international guidelines for medical economic evaluation studies and a checklist used in a previous review. The mean number of quality criteria adhered to was 23 of 30 items, whereas five articles (3%) met all 30 criteria. Compliance was low for the description of the perspective (40%), the completeness of costs looking at the perspective (48%) or time horizon (48%), and reporting of quantities of resources (47%). Furthermore, if no discounting was applied, an explanation was infrequently given (14%). A comparison of study quality to that reported by Smith and Blackmore showed a considerable improvement in the following criteria: presentation perspective (from 19 to 40%), statement of primary outcome measure (from 72 to 81%), completeness costs looking at the time horizon (from 14 to 48%), the presentation of discount rates (from 10 to 54%), details of sensitivity analyses (from 21 to 61%), reporting incremental results (from 17 to 70%), and reporting a summary measure (from 57 to 74%). The quality of economic studies in obstetrics and gynecology has considerably improved in the last decade, but room for further improvement is present.

AB - We evaluated the methodological quality of economic evaluation studies in the field of obstetrics and gynecology published in the last decade. A MEDLINE search was performed to find economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology from the years 1997 through 2009. We included full economic evaluation studies concerning tests or interventions in the field of obstetrics or gynecology. Each included study was evaluated by two reviewers using a quality checklist that was based on international guidelines for medical economic evaluation studies and a checklist used in a previous review. The mean number of quality criteria adhered to was 23 of 30 items, whereas five articles (3%) met all 30 criteria. Compliance was low for the description of the perspective (40%), the completeness of costs looking at the perspective (48%) or time horizon (48%), and reporting of quantities of resources (47%). Furthermore, if no discounting was applied, an explanation was infrequently given (14%). A comparison of study quality to that reported by Smith and Blackmore showed a considerable improvement in the following criteria: presentation perspective (from 19 to 40%), statement of primary outcome measure (from 72 to 81%), completeness costs looking at the time horizon (from 14 to 48%), the presentation of discount rates (from 10 to 54%), details of sensitivity analyses (from 21 to 61%), reporting incremental results (from 17 to 70%), and reporting a summary measure (from 57 to 74%). The quality of economic studies in obstetrics and gynecology has considerably improved in the last decade, but room for further improvement is present.

KW - cost-effectiveness

KW - economic evaluation

KW - gynecology

KW - methodological quality

KW - obstetrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876037257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0032-1323591

DO - 10.1055/s-0032-1323591

M3 - Review article

VL - 30

SP - 253

EP - 260

JO - American journal of perinatology

JF - American journal of perinatology

SN - 0735-1631

IS - 4

ER -