The inSIGHT study: costs and effects of routine hysteroscopy prior to a first IVF treatment cycle. A randomised controlled trial

Janine G. Smit, Jenneke C. Kasius, Marinus J C Eijkemans, Carolien A M Koks, Ron Van Golde, Jurjen G E Oosterhuis, Annemiek W. Nap, Gabrielle J. Scheffer, Petra A P Manger, Annemiek Hoek, Mesrure Kaplan, Dick B C Schoot, Arne M. van Heusden, Walter K H Kuchenbecker, Denise A M Perquin, Kathrin Fleischer, Eugenie M. Kaaijk, Alexander Sluijmer, Jaap Friederich, Joop S E LavenMarcel van Hooff, Leonie A. Louwe, Janet Kwee, Jantien J. Boomgaard, Corry H. de Koning, Ineke C A H Janssen, Femke Mol, Ben W J Mol, Helen L. Torrance, Frank J M Broekmans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment a large drop is present between embryo transfer and occurrence of pregnancy. The implantation rate per embryo transferred is only 30%. Studies have shown that minor intrauterine abnormalities can be found in 11-45% of infertile women with a normal transvaginal sonography or hysterosalpingography. Two randomised controlled trials have indicated that detection and treatment of these abnormalities by office hysteroscopy after two failed IVF cycles leads to a 9-13% increase in pregnancy rate. Therefore, screening of all infertile women for intracavitary pathology prior to the start of IVF/ICSI is increasingly advocated. In absence of a scientific basis for such a policy, this study will assess the effects and costs of screening for and treatment of unsuspected intrauterine abnormalities by routine office hysteroscopy, with or without saline infusion sonography (SIS), prior to a first IVF/ICSI cycle.Methods/design: Multicenter randomised controlled trial in asymptomatic subfertile women, indicated for a first IVF/ICSI treatment cycle, with normal findings at transvaginal sonography. Women with recurrent miscarriages, prior hysteroscopy treatment and intermenstrual blood loss will not be included. Participants will be randomised for a routine fertility work-up with additional (SIS and) hysteroscopy with on-the-spot-treatment of predefined intrauterine abnormalities versus the regular fertility work-up without additional diagnostic tests. The primary study outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate resulting in live birth achieved within 18 months of IVF/ICSI treatment after randomisation. Secondary study outcome parameters are the cumulative implantation rate; cumulative miscarriage rate; patient preference and patient tolerance of a SIS and hysteroscopy procedure. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and cox regression. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to evaluate the costs of the additional tests as routine procedure. In total 700 patients will be included in this study.Discussion: The results of this study will help to clarify the significance of hysteroscopy prior to IVF treatment.Trial registration: NCT01242852.

Original languageEnglish
Article number22
JournalBMC Women's Health
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2012

Keywords

  • Hysteroscopy
  • IVF
  • Subfertility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this