The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers

Charlie Huveneers, Colin A. Simpfendorfer, Susan Kim, Jayson M. Semmens, Alistair J. Hobday, Hugh Pederson, Thomas Stieglitz, Richard Vallee, Dale Webber, Michelle R. Heupel, Vic Peddemors, Robert G. Harcourt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Acoustic telemetry is being increasingly used to study the ecology of many aquatic organisms. This widespread use has been advanced by national and international tracking programs that coordinate deployment of passive acoustic telemetry networks on a regional and continental scale to detect tagged animals. While it is well-known that environmental conditions can affect the performance of acoustic receivers, these effects are rarely quantified despite the profound implications for tag detection and hence the ecological inferences. Here, we deployed eight receivers at different depths within the water column and at different orientations (hydrophone up or down) and 12 tags 200–800 m from the receivers for 234 days to investigate how the tag detection range of acoustic receivers varied through time and under different meteorologic and oceanographic conditions. The study showed that receiver depth and orientation, and time since deployment had the largest effect on the detection range. Thermocline gradient and depth, and wind speed were the environmental factors most affecting detection range, while wind direction, precipitation and atmospheric pressure had negligible or no effect. Comparison of results to a proposed general acoustic theory model and previous studies showed that findings from specific habitat types cannot be generalised and applied across other habitats or environments. A good understanding of the acoustic coverage and temporal variations in relation to environmental conditions are crucial to accurate interpretation of results, and ensuing management recommendations. We recommend that each study include stationary reference tags to measure changes in detection probability with time, help refine detection range, and be used to improve confidence in the reporting and interpretation of the data.

LanguageEnglish
Pages825-835
Number of pages11
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • AATAMS – IMOS
  • acoustic telemetry
  • detection probability
  • detection range
  • sentinel tags

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecological Modelling

Cite this

Huveneers, C., Simpfendorfer, C. A., Kim, S., Semmens, J. M., Hobday, A. J., Pederson, H., ... Harcourt, R. G. (2016). The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(7), 825-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12520
Huveneers, Charlie ; Simpfendorfer, Colin A. ; Kim, Susan ; Semmens, Jayson M. ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Pederson, Hugh ; Stieglitz, Thomas ; Vallee, Richard ; Webber, Dale ; Heupel, Michelle R. ; Peddemors, Vic ; Harcourt, Robert G. / The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers. In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 7. pp. 825-835.
@article{d5709e2264fa4c128e9e806dee564c23,
title = "The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers",
abstract = "Acoustic telemetry is being increasingly used to study the ecology of many aquatic organisms. This widespread use has been advanced by national and international tracking programs that coordinate deployment of passive acoustic telemetry networks on a regional and continental scale to detect tagged animals. While it is well-known that environmental conditions can affect the performance of acoustic receivers, these effects are rarely quantified despite the profound implications for tag detection and hence the ecological inferences. Here, we deployed eight receivers at different depths within the water column and at different orientations (hydrophone up or down) and 12 tags 200–800 m from the receivers for 234 days to investigate how the tag detection range of acoustic receivers varied through time and under different meteorologic and oceanographic conditions. The study showed that receiver depth and orientation, and time since deployment had the largest effect on the detection range. Thermocline gradient and depth, and wind speed were the environmental factors most affecting detection range, while wind direction, precipitation and atmospheric pressure had negligible or no effect. Comparison of results to a proposed general acoustic theory model and previous studies showed that findings from specific habitat types cannot be generalised and applied across other habitats or environments. A good understanding of the acoustic coverage and temporal variations in relation to environmental conditions are crucial to accurate interpretation of results, and ensuing management recommendations. We recommend that each study include stationary reference tags to measure changes in detection probability with time, help refine detection range, and be used to improve confidence in the reporting and interpretation of the data.",
keywords = "AATAMS – IMOS, acoustic telemetry, detection probability, detection range, sentinel tags",
author = "Charlie Huveneers and Simpfendorfer, {Colin A.} and Susan Kim and Semmens, {Jayson M.} and Hobday, {Alistair J.} and Hugh Pederson and Thomas Stieglitz and Richard Vallee and Dale Webber and Heupel, {Michelle R.} and Vic Peddemors and Harcourt, {Robert G.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/2041-210X.12520",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "825--835",
journal = "Methods in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2041-210X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

Huveneers, C, Simpfendorfer, CA, Kim, S, Semmens, JM, Hobday, AJ, Pederson, H, Stieglitz, T, Vallee, R, Webber, D, Heupel, MR, Peddemors, V & Harcourt, RG 2016, 'The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers', Methods in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 825-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12520

The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers. / Huveneers, Charlie; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Kim, Susan; Semmens, Jayson M.; Hobday, Alistair J.; Pederson, Hugh; Stieglitz, Thomas; Vallee, Richard; Webber, Dale; Heupel, Michelle R.; Peddemors, Vic; Harcourt, Robert G.

In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 7, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 825-835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers

AU - Huveneers, Charlie

AU - Simpfendorfer, Colin A.

AU - Kim, Susan

AU - Semmens, Jayson M.

AU - Hobday, Alistair J.

AU - Pederson, Hugh

AU - Stieglitz, Thomas

AU - Vallee, Richard

AU - Webber, Dale

AU - Heupel, Michelle R.

AU - Peddemors, Vic

AU - Harcourt, Robert G.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Acoustic telemetry is being increasingly used to study the ecology of many aquatic organisms. This widespread use has been advanced by national and international tracking programs that coordinate deployment of passive acoustic telemetry networks on a regional and continental scale to detect tagged animals. While it is well-known that environmental conditions can affect the performance of acoustic receivers, these effects are rarely quantified despite the profound implications for tag detection and hence the ecological inferences. Here, we deployed eight receivers at different depths within the water column and at different orientations (hydrophone up or down) and 12 tags 200–800 m from the receivers for 234 days to investigate how the tag detection range of acoustic receivers varied through time and under different meteorologic and oceanographic conditions. The study showed that receiver depth and orientation, and time since deployment had the largest effect on the detection range. Thermocline gradient and depth, and wind speed were the environmental factors most affecting detection range, while wind direction, precipitation and atmospheric pressure had negligible or no effect. Comparison of results to a proposed general acoustic theory model and previous studies showed that findings from specific habitat types cannot be generalised and applied across other habitats or environments. A good understanding of the acoustic coverage and temporal variations in relation to environmental conditions are crucial to accurate interpretation of results, and ensuing management recommendations. We recommend that each study include stationary reference tags to measure changes in detection probability with time, help refine detection range, and be used to improve confidence in the reporting and interpretation of the data.

AB - Acoustic telemetry is being increasingly used to study the ecology of many aquatic organisms. This widespread use has been advanced by national and international tracking programs that coordinate deployment of passive acoustic telemetry networks on a regional and continental scale to detect tagged animals. While it is well-known that environmental conditions can affect the performance of acoustic receivers, these effects are rarely quantified despite the profound implications for tag detection and hence the ecological inferences. Here, we deployed eight receivers at different depths within the water column and at different orientations (hydrophone up or down) and 12 tags 200–800 m from the receivers for 234 days to investigate how the tag detection range of acoustic receivers varied through time and under different meteorologic and oceanographic conditions. The study showed that receiver depth and orientation, and time since deployment had the largest effect on the detection range. Thermocline gradient and depth, and wind speed were the environmental factors most affecting detection range, while wind direction, precipitation and atmospheric pressure had negligible or no effect. Comparison of results to a proposed general acoustic theory model and previous studies showed that findings from specific habitat types cannot be generalised and applied across other habitats or environments. A good understanding of the acoustic coverage and temporal variations in relation to environmental conditions are crucial to accurate interpretation of results, and ensuing management recommendations. We recommend that each study include stationary reference tags to measure changes in detection probability with time, help refine detection range, and be used to improve confidence in the reporting and interpretation of the data.

KW - AATAMS – IMOS

KW - acoustic telemetry

KW - detection probability

KW - detection range

KW - sentinel tags

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953270474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/2041-210X.12520

DO - 10.1111/2041-210X.12520

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 825

EP - 835

JO - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

T2 - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Methods in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2041-210X

IS - 7

ER -