The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: A meta-analysis

P. Swart, B. W.J. Mol, F. Van der Veen, M. Van Beurden, W. K. Redekop, P. M.M. Bossuyt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

247 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in diagnosing tubal patency and peritubal adhesions using laparoscopy with chromopertubation as the gold standard. Design: Meta-analysis of 20 studies comparing HSG and laparoscopy for tubal patency and peritubal adhesions. Patients: Four thousand one hundred seventy-nine patients with infertility in 20 studies. Intervention: Hysterosalpingography and diagnostic laparoscopy as part of infertility workup. Main Outcome Measure: Tubal patency and peritubal adhesions. Results: For tubal patency the reported sensitivity and specificity differed between studies. In a subset of studies that evaluated HSG and laparoscopy independently, a point estimate of 0.65 for sensitivity and 0.83 for specificity was calculated. For peritubal adhesions a summary receiver operating characteristic curve could be estimated. Conclusions: Although HSG is of limited use for detecting tubal patency because of its low sensitivity, its high specificity makes it a useful test for ruling in tubal obstruction. For the evaluation of peritubal adhesions HSG is not reliable.

LanguageEnglish
Pages486-491
Number of pages6
JournalFertility and sterility
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1995

Keywords

  • Hysterosalpingography
  • diagnostic laparoscopy
  • infertility
  • meta-analysis
  • peritubal adhesions
  • tubal patency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Swart, P., Mol, B. W. J., Van der Veen, F., Van Beurden, M., Redekop, W. K., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (1995). The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: A meta-analysis. Fertility and sterility, 64(3), 486-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57781-4