Tailored expectant management: A nationwide survey to quantify patients and professionals barriers and facilitators

N. M. Van Den Boogaard, A. M. Musters, S. W. Brühl, T. Tankens, J. A M Kremer, B. W J Mol, P. G A Hompes, W. L D M Nelen, F. Van Der Veen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Prognostic models for natural conception help to identify subfertile couples with high chances of natural conception, who do not need fertility treatment yet. The use of such models and subsequent tailored expectant management (TEM) is not always practiced. Previous qualitative research has identified barriers and facilitators of TEM among patients and professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of those barriers and facilitators and to evaluate which factors predict patients appreciation of TEM and professionals adherence to TEM.Methods We performed a nationwide survey. Based on the previously identified barriers and facilitators two questionnaires were developed and sent to 195 couples and 167 professionals. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate which factors predicted patients appreciation of TEM and professional adherence to TEM. Results In total, 118 (61) couples and 117 (70) professionals responded and 96 couples and 117 professionals were included in the analysis. Patients mean appreciation of TEM was 5.7, on a 10-point Likert scale. Patients with a lower appreciation of TEM had a higher need for patient information (P = 0.047). The professionals reported a mean adherence to TEM of 63. Adherence to TEM was higher when professionals were fertility doctors (P = 0.041). Facilitators in the clinical domain were associated with a higher adherence to TEM (P = 0.091). Barriers in the professional domain had a negative impact on adherence to TEM (P = 0.008). Conclusion s The limited implementation of TEM is caused by both patient and professional-related factors. This study provides practical tools to improve the implementation of TEM.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1050-1057
Number of pages8
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Keywords

  • barriers
  • expectant management
  • implementation
  • infertility
  • prognostic models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Van Den Boogaard, N. M., Musters, A. M., Brühl, S. W., Tankens, T., Kremer, J. A. M., Mol, B. W. J., ... Van Der Veen, F. (2012). Tailored expectant management: A nationwide survey to quantify patients and professionals barriers and facilitators. Human Reproduction, 27(4), 1050-1057. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des010
Van Den Boogaard, N. M. ; Musters, A. M. ; Brühl, S. W. ; Tankens, T. ; Kremer, J. A M ; Mol, B. W J ; Hompes, P. G A ; Nelen, W. L D M ; Van Der Veen, F. / Tailored expectant management : A nationwide survey to quantify patients and professionals barriers and facilitators. In: Human Reproduction. 2012 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 1050-1057.
@article{393d60ba9a3f4b60807f4b6ac5a51134,
title = "Tailored expectant management: A nationwide survey to quantify patients and professionals barriers and facilitators",
abstract = "Background Prognostic models for natural conception help to identify subfertile couples with high chances of natural conception, who do not need fertility treatment yet. The use of such models and subsequent tailored expectant management (TEM) is not always practiced. Previous qualitative research has identified barriers and facilitators of TEM among patients and professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of those barriers and facilitators and to evaluate which factors predict patients appreciation of TEM and professionals adherence to TEM.Methods We performed a nationwide survey. Based on the previously identified barriers and facilitators two questionnaires were developed and sent to 195 couples and 167 professionals. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate which factors predicted patients appreciation of TEM and professional adherence to TEM. Results In total, 118 (61) couples and 117 (70) professionals responded and 96 couples and 117 professionals were included in the analysis. Patients mean appreciation of TEM was 5.7, on a 10-point Likert scale. Patients with a lower appreciation of TEM had a higher need for patient information (P = 0.047). The professionals reported a mean adherence to TEM of 63. Adherence to TEM was higher when professionals were fertility doctors (P = 0.041). Facilitators in the clinical domain were associated with a higher adherence to TEM (P = 0.091). Barriers in the professional domain had a negative impact on adherence to TEM (P = 0.008). Conclusion s The limited implementation of TEM is caused by both patient and professional-related factors. This study provides practical tools to improve the implementation of TEM.",
keywords = "barriers, expectant management, implementation, infertility, prognostic models",
author = "{Van Den Boogaard}, {N. M.} and Musters, {A. M.} and Br{\"u}hl, {S. W.} and T. Tankens and Kremer, {J. A M} and Mol, {B. W J} and Hompes, {P. G A} and Nelen, {W. L D M} and {Van Der Veen}, F.",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/des010",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1050--1057",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Van Den Boogaard, NM, Musters, AM, Brühl, SW, Tankens, T, Kremer, JAM, Mol, BWJ, Hompes, PGA, Nelen, WLDM & Van Der Veen, F 2012, 'Tailored expectant management: A nationwide survey to quantify patients and professionals barriers and facilitators', Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1050-1057. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des010

Tailored expectant management : A nationwide survey to quantify patients and professionals barriers and facilitators. / Van Den Boogaard, N. M.; Musters, A. M.; Brühl, S. W.; Tankens, T.; Kremer, J. A M; Mol, B. W J; Hompes, P. G A; Nelen, W. L D M; Van Der Veen, F.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.01.2012, p. 1050-1057.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tailored expectant management

T2 - Human Reproduction

AU - Van Den Boogaard, N. M.

AU - Musters, A. M.

AU - Brühl, S. W.

AU - Tankens, T.

AU - Kremer, J. A M

AU - Mol, B. W J

AU - Hompes, P. G A

AU - Nelen, W. L D M

AU - Van Der Veen, F.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Background Prognostic models for natural conception help to identify subfertile couples with high chances of natural conception, who do not need fertility treatment yet. The use of such models and subsequent tailored expectant management (TEM) is not always practiced. Previous qualitative research has identified barriers and facilitators of TEM among patients and professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of those barriers and facilitators and to evaluate which factors predict patients appreciation of TEM and professionals adherence to TEM.Methods We performed a nationwide survey. Based on the previously identified barriers and facilitators two questionnaires were developed and sent to 195 couples and 167 professionals. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate which factors predicted patients appreciation of TEM and professional adherence to TEM. Results In total, 118 (61) couples and 117 (70) professionals responded and 96 couples and 117 professionals were included in the analysis. Patients mean appreciation of TEM was 5.7, on a 10-point Likert scale. Patients with a lower appreciation of TEM had a higher need for patient information (P = 0.047). The professionals reported a mean adherence to TEM of 63. Adherence to TEM was higher when professionals were fertility doctors (P = 0.041). Facilitators in the clinical domain were associated with a higher adherence to TEM (P = 0.091). Barriers in the professional domain had a negative impact on adherence to TEM (P = 0.008). Conclusion s The limited implementation of TEM is caused by both patient and professional-related factors. This study provides practical tools to improve the implementation of TEM.

AB - Background Prognostic models for natural conception help to identify subfertile couples with high chances of natural conception, who do not need fertility treatment yet. The use of such models and subsequent tailored expectant management (TEM) is not always practiced. Previous qualitative research has identified barriers and facilitators of TEM among patients and professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of those barriers and facilitators and to evaluate which factors predict patients appreciation of TEM and professionals adherence to TEM.Methods We performed a nationwide survey. Based on the previously identified barriers and facilitators two questionnaires were developed and sent to 195 couples and 167 professionals. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate which factors predicted patients appreciation of TEM and professional adherence to TEM. Results In total, 118 (61) couples and 117 (70) professionals responded and 96 couples and 117 professionals were included in the analysis. Patients mean appreciation of TEM was 5.7, on a 10-point Likert scale. Patients with a lower appreciation of TEM had a higher need for patient information (P = 0.047). The professionals reported a mean adherence to TEM of 63. Adherence to TEM was higher when professionals were fertility doctors (P = 0.041). Facilitators in the clinical domain were associated with a higher adherence to TEM (P = 0.091). Barriers in the professional domain had a negative impact on adherence to TEM (P = 0.008). Conclusion s The limited implementation of TEM is caused by both patient and professional-related factors. This study provides practical tools to improve the implementation of TEM.

KW - barriers

KW - expectant management

KW - implementation

KW - infertility

KW - prognostic models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858407903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/des010

DO - 10.1093/humrep/des010

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1050

EP - 1057

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 4

ER -

Van Den Boogaard NM, Musters AM, Brühl SW, Tankens T, Kremer JAM, Mol BWJ et al. Tailored expectant management: A nationwide survey to quantify patients and professionals barriers and facilitators. Human Reproduction. 2012 Jan 1;27(4):1050-1057. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des010