Systematic review to inform prevention and management of chronic disease for Indigenous Australians: Overview and priorities

Judith Streak Gomersall, Karla Canuto, Edoardo Aromataris, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Alex Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe the main characteristics of systematic reviews addressing questions of chronic disease and related risk factors for Indigenous Australians. Methods: We searched databases for systematic reviews meeting inclusion criteria. Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted characteristics using pre-defined tools. Results: We identified 14 systematic reviews. Seven synthesised evidence about health intervention effectiveness; four addressed chronic disease or risk factor prevalence; and six conducted critical appraisal as per current best practice. Only three reported steps to align the review with standards for ethical research with Indigenous Australians and/or capture Indigenous-specific knowledge. Most called for more high-quality research. Conclusion: Systematic review is an under-utilised method for gathering evidence to inform chronic disease prevention and management for Indigenous Australians. Relevance of future systematic reviews could be improved by: 1) aligning questions with community priorities as well as decision maker needs; 2) involvement of, and leadership by, Indigenous researchers with relevant cultural and contextual knowledge; iii) use of critical appraisal tools that include traditional risk of bias assessment criteria and criteria that reflect Indigenous standards of appropriate research. Implications: Systematic review method guidance, tools and reporting standards are required to ensure alignment with ethical obligations and promote rigor and relevance.

LanguageEnglish
Pages22-29
Number of pages8
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • chronic disease
  • Indigenous Australian health
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{2b68562561464fce84a86a32aa5c1ec4,
title = "Systematic review to inform prevention and management of chronic disease for Indigenous Australians: Overview and priorities",
abstract = "Objective: To describe the main characteristics of systematic reviews addressing questions of chronic disease and related risk factors for Indigenous Australians. Methods: We searched databases for systematic reviews meeting inclusion criteria. Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted characteristics using pre-defined tools. Results: We identified 14 systematic reviews. Seven synthesised evidence about health intervention effectiveness; four addressed chronic disease or risk factor prevalence; and six conducted critical appraisal as per current best practice. Only three reported steps to align the review with standards for ethical research with Indigenous Australians and/or capture Indigenous-specific knowledge. Most called for more high-quality research. Conclusion: Systematic review is an under-utilised method for gathering evidence to inform chronic disease prevention and management for Indigenous Australians. Relevance of future systematic reviews could be improved by: 1) aligning questions with community priorities as well as decision maker needs; 2) involvement of, and leadership by, Indigenous researchers with relevant cultural and contextual knowledge; iii) use of critical appraisal tools that include traditional risk of bias assessment criteria and criteria that reflect Indigenous standards of appropriate research. Implications: Systematic review method guidance, tools and reporting standards are required to ensure alignment with ethical obligations and promote rigor and relevance.",
keywords = "chronic disease, Indigenous Australian health, systematic review",
author = "Gomersall, {Judith Streak} and Karla Canuto and Edoardo Aromataris and Annette Braunack-Mayer and Alex Brown",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1753-6405.12476",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "22--29",
journal = "Community Health Studies",
issn = "1326-0200",
publisher = "Public Health Association of Australia Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review to inform prevention and management of chronic disease for Indigenous Australians

T2 - Community Health Studies

AU - Gomersall, Judith Streak

AU - Canuto, Karla

AU - Aromataris, Edoardo

AU - Braunack-Mayer, Annette

AU - Brown, Alex

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Objective: To describe the main characteristics of systematic reviews addressing questions of chronic disease and related risk factors for Indigenous Australians. Methods: We searched databases for systematic reviews meeting inclusion criteria. Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted characteristics using pre-defined tools. Results: We identified 14 systematic reviews. Seven synthesised evidence about health intervention effectiveness; four addressed chronic disease or risk factor prevalence; and six conducted critical appraisal as per current best practice. Only three reported steps to align the review with standards for ethical research with Indigenous Australians and/or capture Indigenous-specific knowledge. Most called for more high-quality research. Conclusion: Systematic review is an under-utilised method for gathering evidence to inform chronic disease prevention and management for Indigenous Australians. Relevance of future systematic reviews could be improved by: 1) aligning questions with community priorities as well as decision maker needs; 2) involvement of, and leadership by, Indigenous researchers with relevant cultural and contextual knowledge; iii) use of critical appraisal tools that include traditional risk of bias assessment criteria and criteria that reflect Indigenous standards of appropriate research. Implications: Systematic review method guidance, tools and reporting standards are required to ensure alignment with ethical obligations and promote rigor and relevance.

AB - Objective: To describe the main characteristics of systematic reviews addressing questions of chronic disease and related risk factors for Indigenous Australians. Methods: We searched databases for systematic reviews meeting inclusion criteria. Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted characteristics using pre-defined tools. Results: We identified 14 systematic reviews. Seven synthesised evidence about health intervention effectiveness; four addressed chronic disease or risk factor prevalence; and six conducted critical appraisal as per current best practice. Only three reported steps to align the review with standards for ethical research with Indigenous Australians and/or capture Indigenous-specific knowledge. Most called for more high-quality research. Conclusion: Systematic review is an under-utilised method for gathering evidence to inform chronic disease prevention and management for Indigenous Australians. Relevance of future systematic reviews could be improved by: 1) aligning questions with community priorities as well as decision maker needs; 2) involvement of, and leadership by, Indigenous researchers with relevant cultural and contextual knowledge; iii) use of critical appraisal tools that include traditional risk of bias assessment criteria and criteria that reflect Indigenous standards of appropriate research. Implications: Systematic review method guidance, tools and reporting standards are required to ensure alignment with ethical obligations and promote rigor and relevance.

KW - chronic disease

KW - Indigenous Australian health

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956835530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12476

DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12476

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 22

EP - 29

JO - Community Health Studies

JF - Community Health Studies

SN - 1326-0200

IS - 1

ER -