Student & tutor consensus: a partnership in assessment for learning

James Thompson, Don Houston, Kathryn Dansie, Timothy Rayner, Timothy Pointon, Simon Pope, Anthea Cayetano, Brad Mitchell, Hugh Grantham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mistakes made when attempting tasks often prove to be some of the most invaluable learning experiences. Despite this, outcome and results driven assessment formats largely penalise student performance errors or reward students who succeed by chance. The consequences of this paradigm are visible effects on student relationships with assessment. The student–tutor consensus approach to assessment was introduced to capture student learning achieved ‘from’ assessment to complement the measurement of performance outcomes. This approach parallels student and tutor judgement in a grade negotiation, affording the student an opportunity to share with their assessor what they have learned from the assessment activity. This student self-awareness was then considered alongside the conventional outcome-based score awarded by the tutor to generate a final grade for the assessed activity. Our study evaluated the perceptions of 90 undergraduate students enrolled in the bachelor of paramedic studies, who participated in this novel assessment approach as part of a final-year capstone topic. The results comprehensively indicated value for all aspects of the assessment approach, as well as a recognition that the skills will be useful in their future professional roles.

LanguageEnglish
Pages942-952
Number of pages11
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • co-assessment
  • Consensus marking
  • paramedic education
  • self-reflection
  • self-regulated learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Thompson, James ; Houston, Don ; Dansie, Kathryn ; Rayner, Timothy ; Pointon, Timothy ; Pope, Simon ; Cayetano, Anthea ; Mitchell, Brad ; Grantham, Hugh. / Student & tutor consensus : a partnership in assessment for learning. In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 942-952.
@article{67e7791b8f23430a855041ae3496922a,
title = "Student & tutor consensus: a partnership in assessment for learning",
abstract = "The mistakes made when attempting tasks often prove to be some of the most invaluable learning experiences. Despite this, outcome and results driven assessment formats largely penalise student performance errors or reward students who succeed by chance. The consequences of this paradigm are visible effects on student relationships with assessment. The student–tutor consensus approach to assessment was introduced to capture student learning achieved ‘from’ assessment to complement the measurement of performance outcomes. This approach parallels student and tutor judgement in a grade negotiation, affording the student an opportunity to share with their assessor what they have learned from the assessment activity. This student self-awareness was then considered alongside the conventional outcome-based score awarded by the tutor to generate a final grade for the assessed activity. Our study evaluated the perceptions of 90 undergraduate students enrolled in the bachelor of paramedic studies, who participated in this novel assessment approach as part of a final-year capstone topic. The results comprehensively indicated value for all aspects of the assessment approach, as well as a recognition that the skills will be useful in their future professional roles.",
keywords = "co-assessment, Consensus marking, paramedic education, self-reflection, self-regulated learning",
author = "James Thompson and Don Houston and Kathryn Dansie and Timothy Rayner and Timothy Pointon and Simon Pope and Anthea Cayetano and Brad Mitchell and Hugh Grantham",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2016.1211988",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "942--952",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "0260-2938",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Thompson, J, Houston, D, Dansie, K, Rayner, T, Pointon, T, Pope, S, Cayetano, A, Mitchell, B & Grantham, H 2017, 'Student & tutor consensus: a partnership in assessment for learning', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 942-952. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1211988

Student & tutor consensus : a partnership in assessment for learning. / Thompson, James; Houston, Don; Dansie, Kathryn; Rayner, Timothy; Pointon, Timothy; Pope, Simon; Cayetano, Anthea; Mitchell, Brad; Grantham, Hugh.

In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 42, No. 6, 18.08.2017, p. 942-952.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Student & tutor consensus

T2 - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

AU - Thompson, James

AU - Houston, Don

AU - Dansie, Kathryn

AU - Rayner, Timothy

AU - Pointon, Timothy

AU - Pope, Simon

AU - Cayetano, Anthea

AU - Mitchell, Brad

AU - Grantham, Hugh

PY - 2017/8/18

Y1 - 2017/8/18

N2 - The mistakes made when attempting tasks often prove to be some of the most invaluable learning experiences. Despite this, outcome and results driven assessment formats largely penalise student performance errors or reward students who succeed by chance. The consequences of this paradigm are visible effects on student relationships with assessment. The student–tutor consensus approach to assessment was introduced to capture student learning achieved ‘from’ assessment to complement the measurement of performance outcomes. This approach parallels student and tutor judgement in a grade negotiation, affording the student an opportunity to share with their assessor what they have learned from the assessment activity. This student self-awareness was then considered alongside the conventional outcome-based score awarded by the tutor to generate a final grade for the assessed activity. Our study evaluated the perceptions of 90 undergraduate students enrolled in the bachelor of paramedic studies, who participated in this novel assessment approach as part of a final-year capstone topic. The results comprehensively indicated value for all aspects of the assessment approach, as well as a recognition that the skills will be useful in their future professional roles.

AB - The mistakes made when attempting tasks often prove to be some of the most invaluable learning experiences. Despite this, outcome and results driven assessment formats largely penalise student performance errors or reward students who succeed by chance. The consequences of this paradigm are visible effects on student relationships with assessment. The student–tutor consensus approach to assessment was introduced to capture student learning achieved ‘from’ assessment to complement the measurement of performance outcomes. This approach parallels student and tutor judgement in a grade negotiation, affording the student an opportunity to share with their assessor what they have learned from the assessment activity. This student self-awareness was then considered alongside the conventional outcome-based score awarded by the tutor to generate a final grade for the assessed activity. Our study evaluated the perceptions of 90 undergraduate students enrolled in the bachelor of paramedic studies, who participated in this novel assessment approach as part of a final-year capstone topic. The results comprehensively indicated value for all aspects of the assessment approach, as well as a recognition that the skills will be useful in their future professional roles.

KW - co-assessment

KW - Consensus marking

KW - paramedic education

KW - self-reflection

KW - self-regulated learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978745481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2016.1211988

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2016.1211988

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 942

EP - 952

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 0260-2938

IS - 6

ER -