Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective Health behavior, health promotion and society

Kevin Rowley, Joyce Doyle, Leah Johnston, Rachel Reilly, Leisa McCarthy, Mayatili Marika, Therese Riley, Petah Atkinson, Bradley Firebrace, Julie Calleja, Margaret Cargo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health. Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure. Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs. Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.

LanguageEnglish
Article number1215
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
  • Determinants of health
  • Ecological
  • Evaluation
  • First Peoples
  • Health promotion
  • Systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Rowley, Kevin ; Doyle, Joyce ; Johnston, Leah ; Reilly, Rachel ; McCarthy, Leisa ; Marika, Mayatili ; Riley, Therese ; Atkinson, Petah ; Firebrace, Bradley ; Calleja, Julie ; Cargo, Margaret. / Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective Health behavior, health promotion and society. In: BMC Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{de8a3e0f47884dc58f934f52e1b1966d,
title = "Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective Health behavior, health promotion and society",
abstract = "Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health. Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure. Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs. Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.",
keywords = "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Determinants of health, Ecological, Evaluation, First Peoples, Health promotion, Systems",
author = "Kevin Rowley and Joyce Doyle and Leah Johnston and Rachel Reilly and Leisa McCarthy and Mayatili Marika and Therese Riley and Petah Atkinson and Bradley Firebrace and Julie Calleja and Margaret Cargo",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-015-2550-3",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective Health behavior, health promotion and society. / Rowley, Kevin; Doyle, Joyce; Johnston, Leah; Reilly, Rachel; McCarthy, Leisa; Marika, Mayatili; Riley, Therese; Atkinson, Petah; Firebrace, Bradley; Calleja, Julie; Cargo, Margaret.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1215, 08.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective Health behavior, health promotion and society

AU - Rowley, Kevin

AU - Doyle, Joyce

AU - Johnston, Leah

AU - Reilly, Rachel

AU - McCarthy, Leisa

AU - Marika, Mayatili

AU - Riley, Therese

AU - Atkinson, Petah

AU - Firebrace, Bradley

AU - Calleja, Julie

AU - Cargo, Margaret

PY - 2015/12/8

Y1 - 2015/12/8

N2 - Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health. Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure. Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs. Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.

AB - Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health. Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure. Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs. Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.

KW - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

KW - Determinants of health

KW - Ecological

KW - Evaluation

KW - First Peoples

KW - Health promotion

KW - Systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949254706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-015-2550-3

DO - 10.1186/s12889-015-2550-3

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - BMC Public Health

T2 - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 1215

ER -