Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: The ACCREDIT project study protocol

Jeffrey Braithwaite, Johanna Westbrook, Brian Johnston, Stephen Clark, Mark Brandon, Margaret Banks, Clifford Hughes, David Greenfield, Marjorie Pawsey, Angus Corbett, Andrew Georgiou, Joanne Callen, John Vretveit, Catherine Pope, Rosa Sũol, Charles Shaw, Deborah Debono, Mary Westbrook, Reece Hinchcliff, Max Moldovan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. Findings. We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. Discussion. The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. "Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John vretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009].

LanguageEnglish
Article number390
JournalBMC Research Notes
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Braithwaite, Jeffrey ; Westbrook, Johanna ; Johnston, Brian ; Clark, Stephen ; Brandon, Mark ; Banks, Margaret ; Hughes, Clifford ; Greenfield, David ; Pawsey, Marjorie ; Corbett, Angus ; Georgiou, Andrew ; Callen, Joanne ; Vretveit, John ; Pope, Catherine ; Sũol, Rosa ; Shaw, Charles ; Debono, Deborah ; Westbrook, Mary ; Hinchcliff, Reece ; Moldovan, Max. / Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies : The ACCREDIT project study protocol. In: BMC Research Notes. 2011 ; Vol. 4.
@article{a6f1ac60897f4b3893a101f51f18303f,
title = "Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: The ACCREDIT project study protocol",
abstract = "Background: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. Findings. We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. Discussion. The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. {"}Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction.{"} [Professor John vretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009].",
author = "Jeffrey Braithwaite and Johanna Westbrook and Brian Johnston and Stephen Clark and Mark Brandon and Margaret Banks and Clifford Hughes and David Greenfield and Marjorie Pawsey and Angus Corbett and Andrew Georgiou and Joanne Callen and John Vretveit and Catherine Pope and Rosa Sũol and Charles Shaw and Deborah Debono and Mary Westbrook and Reece Hinchcliff and Max Moldovan",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1186/1756-0500-4-390",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "BMC Research Notes",
issn = "1756-0500",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Braithwaite, J, Westbrook, J, Johnston, B, Clark, S, Brandon, M, Banks, M, Hughes, C, Greenfield, D, Pawsey, M, Corbett, A, Georgiou, A, Callen, J, Vretveit, J, Pope, C, Sũol, R, Shaw, C, Debono, D, Westbrook, M, Hinchcliff, R & Moldovan, M 2011, 'Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: The ACCREDIT project study protocol', BMC Research Notes, vol. 4, 390. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-390

Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies : The ACCREDIT project study protocol. / Braithwaite, Jeffrey; Westbrook, Johanna; Johnston, Brian; Clark, Stephen; Brandon, Mark; Banks, Margaret; Hughes, Clifford; Greenfield, David; Pawsey, Marjorie; Corbett, Angus; Georgiou, Andrew; Callen, Joanne; Vretveit, John; Pope, Catherine; Sũol, Rosa; Shaw, Charles; Debono, Deborah; Westbrook, Mary; Hinchcliff, Reece; Moldovan, Max.

In: BMC Research Notes, Vol. 4, 390, 11.10.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies

T2 - BMC Research Notes

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

AU - Westbrook, Johanna

AU - Johnston, Brian

AU - Clark, Stephen

AU - Brandon, Mark

AU - Banks, Margaret

AU - Hughes, Clifford

AU - Greenfield, David

AU - Pawsey, Marjorie

AU - Corbett, Angus

AU - Georgiou, Andrew

AU - Callen, Joanne

AU - Vretveit, John

AU - Pope, Catherine

AU - Sũol, Rosa

AU - Shaw, Charles

AU - Debono, Deborah

AU - Westbrook, Mary

AU - Hinchcliff, Reece

AU - Moldovan, Max

PY - 2011/10/11

Y1 - 2011/10/11

N2 - Background: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. Findings. We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. Discussion. The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. "Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John vretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009].

AB - Background: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. Findings. We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. Discussion. The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. "Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John vretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053590514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1756-0500-4-390

DO - 10.1186/1756-0500-4-390

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - BMC Research Notes

JF - BMC Research Notes

SN - 1756-0500

M1 - 390

ER -