Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States

Gloria Mejia Delgado, Hawazin W. Elani, Sam Harper, W. Murray Thomson, Xiangqun Ju, Ichiro Kawachi, Jay S. Kaufman, Lisa M. Jamieson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic inequalities are associated with oral health status, either subjectively (self-rated oral health) or objectively (clinically-diagnosed dental diseases). The aim of this study is to compare the magnitude of socioeconomic inequality in oral health and dental disease among adults in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States (US). Methods: Nationally-representative survey examination data were used to calculate adjusted absolute differences (AD) in prevalence of untreated decay and fair/poor self-rated oral health (SROH) in income and education. We pooled age- and gender-adjusted inequality estimates using random effects meta-analysis. Results: New Zealand demonstrated the highest adjusted estimate for untreated decay; the US showed the highest adjusted prevalence of fair/poor SROH. The meta-analysis showed little heterogeneity across countries for the prevalence of decayed teeth; the pooled ADs were 19.7 (95% CI=16.7-22.7) and 12.0 (95% CI=8.4-15.7) between highest and lowest education and income groups, respectively. There was heterogeneity in the mean number of decayed teeth and in fair/poor SROH. New Zealand had the widest inequality in decay (education AD=0.8; 95% CI=0.4-1.2; income AD=1.0; 95% CI=0.5-1.5) and the US the widest inequality in fair/poor SROH (education AD=40.4; 95% CI=35.2-45.5; income AD=20.5; 95% CI=13.0-27.9). Conclusions: The differences in estimates, and variation in the magnitude of inequality, suggest the need for further examining socio-cultural and contextual determinants of oral health and dental disease in both the included and other countries.

LanguageEnglish
Article number176
JournalBMC Oral Health
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Dental caries
  • Oral health
  • Self-report
  • Socioeconomic factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Mejia Delgado, G., Elani, H. W., Harper, S., Murray Thomson, W., Ju, X., Kawachi, I., ... Jamieson, L. M. (2018). Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. BMC Oral Health, 18(1), [176]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0630-3
Mejia Delgado, Gloria ; Elani, Hawazin W. ; Harper, Sam ; Murray Thomson, W. ; Ju, Xiangqun ; Kawachi, Ichiro ; Kaufman, Jay S. ; Jamieson, Lisa M. / Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. In: BMC Oral Health. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{831e811872984dc89296e7b355be0516,
title = "Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States",
abstract = "Background: Socioeconomic inequalities are associated with oral health status, either subjectively (self-rated oral health) or objectively (clinically-diagnosed dental diseases). The aim of this study is to compare the magnitude of socioeconomic inequality in oral health and dental disease among adults in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States (US). Methods: Nationally-representative survey examination data were used to calculate adjusted absolute differences (AD) in prevalence of untreated decay and fair/poor self-rated oral health (SROH) in income and education. We pooled age- and gender-adjusted inequality estimates using random effects meta-analysis. Results: New Zealand demonstrated the highest adjusted estimate for untreated decay; the US showed the highest adjusted prevalence of fair/poor SROH. The meta-analysis showed little heterogeneity across countries for the prevalence of decayed teeth; the pooled ADs were 19.7 (95{\%} CI=16.7-22.7) and 12.0 (95{\%} CI=8.4-15.7) between highest and lowest education and income groups, respectively. There was heterogeneity in the mean number of decayed teeth and in fair/poor SROH. New Zealand had the widest inequality in decay (education AD=0.8; 95{\%} CI=0.4-1.2; income AD=1.0; 95{\%} CI=0.5-1.5) and the US the widest inequality in fair/poor SROH (education AD=40.4; 95{\%} CI=35.2-45.5; income AD=20.5; 95{\%} CI=13.0-27.9). Conclusions: The differences in estimates, and variation in the magnitude of inequality, suggest the need for further examining socio-cultural and contextual determinants of oral health and dental disease in both the included and other countries.",
keywords = "Dental caries, Oral health, Self-report, Socioeconomic factors",
author = "{Mejia Delgado}, Gloria and Elani, {Hawazin W.} and Sam Harper and {Murray Thomson}, W. and Xiangqun Ju and Ichiro Kawachi and Kaufman, {Jay S.} and Jamieson, {Lisa M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1186/s12903-018-0630-3",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Oral Health",
issn = "1472-6831",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Mejia Delgado, G, Elani, HW, Harper, S, Murray Thomson, W, Ju, X, Kawachi, I, Kaufman, JS & Jamieson, LM 2018, 'Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States', BMC Oral Health, vol. 18, no. 1, 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0630-3

Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. / Mejia Delgado, Gloria; Elani, Hawazin W.; Harper, Sam; Murray Thomson, W.; Ju, Xiangqun; Kawachi, Ichiro; Kaufman, Jay S.; Jamieson, Lisa M.

In: BMC Oral Health, Vol. 18, No. 1, 176, 26.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic status, oral health and dental disease in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States

AU - Mejia Delgado, Gloria

AU - Elani, Hawazin W.

AU - Harper, Sam

AU - Murray Thomson, W.

AU - Ju, Xiangqun

AU - Kawachi, Ichiro

AU - Kaufman, Jay S.

AU - Jamieson, Lisa M.

PY - 2018/10/26

Y1 - 2018/10/26

N2 - Background: Socioeconomic inequalities are associated with oral health status, either subjectively (self-rated oral health) or objectively (clinically-diagnosed dental diseases). The aim of this study is to compare the magnitude of socioeconomic inequality in oral health and dental disease among adults in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States (US). Methods: Nationally-representative survey examination data were used to calculate adjusted absolute differences (AD) in prevalence of untreated decay and fair/poor self-rated oral health (SROH) in income and education. We pooled age- and gender-adjusted inequality estimates using random effects meta-analysis. Results: New Zealand demonstrated the highest adjusted estimate for untreated decay; the US showed the highest adjusted prevalence of fair/poor SROH. The meta-analysis showed little heterogeneity across countries for the prevalence of decayed teeth; the pooled ADs were 19.7 (95% CI=16.7-22.7) and 12.0 (95% CI=8.4-15.7) between highest and lowest education and income groups, respectively. There was heterogeneity in the mean number of decayed teeth and in fair/poor SROH. New Zealand had the widest inequality in decay (education AD=0.8; 95% CI=0.4-1.2; income AD=1.0; 95% CI=0.5-1.5) and the US the widest inequality in fair/poor SROH (education AD=40.4; 95% CI=35.2-45.5; income AD=20.5; 95% CI=13.0-27.9). Conclusions: The differences in estimates, and variation in the magnitude of inequality, suggest the need for further examining socio-cultural and contextual determinants of oral health and dental disease in both the included and other countries.

AB - Background: Socioeconomic inequalities are associated with oral health status, either subjectively (self-rated oral health) or objectively (clinically-diagnosed dental diseases). The aim of this study is to compare the magnitude of socioeconomic inequality in oral health and dental disease among adults in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States (US). Methods: Nationally-representative survey examination data were used to calculate adjusted absolute differences (AD) in prevalence of untreated decay and fair/poor self-rated oral health (SROH) in income and education. We pooled age- and gender-adjusted inequality estimates using random effects meta-analysis. Results: New Zealand demonstrated the highest adjusted estimate for untreated decay; the US showed the highest adjusted prevalence of fair/poor SROH. The meta-analysis showed little heterogeneity across countries for the prevalence of decayed teeth; the pooled ADs were 19.7 (95% CI=16.7-22.7) and 12.0 (95% CI=8.4-15.7) between highest and lowest education and income groups, respectively. There was heterogeneity in the mean number of decayed teeth and in fair/poor SROH. New Zealand had the widest inequality in decay (education AD=0.8; 95% CI=0.4-1.2; income AD=1.0; 95% CI=0.5-1.5) and the US the widest inequality in fair/poor SROH (education AD=40.4; 95% CI=35.2-45.5; income AD=20.5; 95% CI=13.0-27.9). Conclusions: The differences in estimates, and variation in the magnitude of inequality, suggest the need for further examining socio-cultural and contextual determinants of oral health and dental disease in both the included and other countries.

KW - Dental caries

KW - Oral health

KW - Self-report

KW - Socioeconomic factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055472375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12903-018-0630-3

DO - 10.1186/s12903-018-0630-3

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - BMC Oral Health

T2 - BMC Oral Health

JF - BMC Oral Health

SN - 1472-6831

IS - 1

M1 - 176

ER -