Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony

Xuan Zhou, Sally A. Ferguson, Raymond W. Matthews, Charli Sargent, David Darwent, David J. Kennaway, Gregory D. Roach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objectives: The homeostatic-circadian regulation of neurobehavioral functioning is not well understood in that the role of sleep dose in relation to prior wake and circadian phase remains largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to examine the neurobehavioral impact of sleep dose at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Design: A between-participant design involving 2 forced desynchrony protocols varying in sleep dose. Both protocols comprised 7 repetitions of a 28-h sleep/wake cycle. The sleep dose in a standard protocol was 9.33 h per 28-h day and 4.67 h in a sleep-restricted protocol. Setting: A time-isolation laboratory at the Centre for Sleep Research, the University of South Australia. Participants: A total of 27 young healthy males participated in the study with 13 in the standard protocol (age 22.5 ± 2.2 y) and 14 in the sleep-restricted protocol (age 21.8 ± 3.8 y). Interventions: Wake periods during both protocols were approximately 4 h delayed each 28-h day relative to the circadian system, allowing performance testing at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. The manipulation in sleep dose between the 2 protocols, therefore, allowed the impact of sleep dose on neurobehavioral performance to be examined at various combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Measurements and Results: Neurobehavioral function was assessed using the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). There was a sleep dose x circadian phase interaction effect on PVT performance such that sleep restriction resulted in slower and more variable response times, predominantly during the biological night. This interaction was not altered by prior wakefulness, as indicated by a nonsignificant sleep dose x circadian phase x prior wake interaction. Conclusions: The performance consequence of sleep restriction in our study was prominent during the biological night, even when the prior wake duration was short, and this performance consequence was in forms of waking state instability. This result is likely due to acute homeostatic sleep pressure remaining high despite the sleep episode.

LanguageEnglish
Pages931-941
Number of pages11
JournalSleep
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Circadian phase
  • Forced desynchrony
  • Neurobehavioral function
  • Prior wake
  • Sleep restriction
  • State instability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Zhou, X., Ferguson, S. A., Matthews, R. W., Sargent, C., Darwent, D., Kennaway, D. J., & Roach, G. D. (2011). Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony. Sleep, 34(7), 931-941. https://doi.org/10.5665/SLEEP.1130
Zhou, Xuan ; Ferguson, Sally A. ; Matthews, Raymond W. ; Sargent, Charli ; Darwent, David ; Kennaway, David J. ; Roach, Gregory D. / Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony. In: Sleep. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 7. pp. 931-941.
@article{d7426a298385414fb765a4e375ac909e,
title = "Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony",
abstract = "Study Objectives: The homeostatic-circadian regulation of neurobehavioral functioning is not well understood in that the role of sleep dose in relation to prior wake and circadian phase remains largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to examine the neurobehavioral impact of sleep dose at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Design: A between-participant design involving 2 forced desynchrony protocols varying in sleep dose. Both protocols comprised 7 repetitions of a 28-h sleep/wake cycle. The sleep dose in a standard protocol was 9.33 h per 28-h day and 4.67 h in a sleep-restricted protocol. Setting: A time-isolation laboratory at the Centre for Sleep Research, the University of South Australia. Participants: A total of 27 young healthy males participated in the study with 13 in the standard protocol (age 22.5 ± 2.2 y) and 14 in the sleep-restricted protocol (age 21.8 ± 3.8 y). Interventions: Wake periods during both protocols were approximately 4 h delayed each 28-h day relative to the circadian system, allowing performance testing at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. The manipulation in sleep dose between the 2 protocols, therefore, allowed the impact of sleep dose on neurobehavioral performance to be examined at various combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Measurements and Results: Neurobehavioral function was assessed using the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). There was a sleep dose x circadian phase interaction effect on PVT performance such that sleep restriction resulted in slower and more variable response times, predominantly during the biological night. This interaction was not altered by prior wakefulness, as indicated by a nonsignificant sleep dose x circadian phase x prior wake interaction. Conclusions: The performance consequence of sleep restriction in our study was prominent during the biological night, even when the prior wake duration was short, and this performance consequence was in forms of waking state instability. This result is likely due to acute homeostatic sleep pressure remaining high despite the sleep episode.",
keywords = "Circadian phase, Forced desynchrony, Neurobehavioral function, Prior wake, Sleep restriction, State instability",
author = "Xuan Zhou and Ferguson, {Sally A.} and Matthews, {Raymond W.} and Charli Sargent and David Darwent and Kennaway, {David J.} and Roach, {Gregory D.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5665/SLEEP.1130",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "931--941",
journal = "Sleep",
issn = "0161-8105",
publisher = "American Academy of Sleep Medicine",
number = "7",

}

Zhou, X, Ferguson, SA, Matthews, RW, Sargent, C, Darwent, D, Kennaway, DJ & Roach, GD 2011, 'Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony', Sleep, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 931-941. https://doi.org/10.5665/SLEEP.1130

Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony. / Zhou, Xuan; Ferguson, Sally A.; Matthews, Raymond W.; Sargent, Charli; Darwent, David; Kennaway, David J.; Roach, Gregory D.

In: Sleep, Vol. 34, No. 7, 01.07.2011, p. 931-941.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony

AU - Zhou, Xuan

AU - Ferguson, Sally A.

AU - Matthews, Raymond W.

AU - Sargent, Charli

AU - Darwent, David

AU - Kennaway, David J.

AU - Roach, Gregory D.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Study Objectives: The homeostatic-circadian regulation of neurobehavioral functioning is not well understood in that the role of sleep dose in relation to prior wake and circadian phase remains largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to examine the neurobehavioral impact of sleep dose at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Design: A between-participant design involving 2 forced desynchrony protocols varying in sleep dose. Both protocols comprised 7 repetitions of a 28-h sleep/wake cycle. The sleep dose in a standard protocol was 9.33 h per 28-h day and 4.67 h in a sleep-restricted protocol. Setting: A time-isolation laboratory at the Centre for Sleep Research, the University of South Australia. Participants: A total of 27 young healthy males participated in the study with 13 in the standard protocol (age 22.5 ± 2.2 y) and 14 in the sleep-restricted protocol (age 21.8 ± 3.8 y). Interventions: Wake periods during both protocols were approximately 4 h delayed each 28-h day relative to the circadian system, allowing performance testing at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. The manipulation in sleep dose between the 2 protocols, therefore, allowed the impact of sleep dose on neurobehavioral performance to be examined at various combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Measurements and Results: Neurobehavioral function was assessed using the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). There was a sleep dose x circadian phase interaction effect on PVT performance such that sleep restriction resulted in slower and more variable response times, predominantly during the biological night. This interaction was not altered by prior wakefulness, as indicated by a nonsignificant sleep dose x circadian phase x prior wake interaction. Conclusions: The performance consequence of sleep restriction in our study was prominent during the biological night, even when the prior wake duration was short, and this performance consequence was in forms of waking state instability. This result is likely due to acute homeostatic sleep pressure remaining high despite the sleep episode.

AB - Study Objectives: The homeostatic-circadian regulation of neurobehavioral functioning is not well understood in that the role of sleep dose in relation to prior wake and circadian phase remains largely unexplored. The aim of the present study was to examine the neurobehavioral impact of sleep dose at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Design: A between-participant design involving 2 forced desynchrony protocols varying in sleep dose. Both protocols comprised 7 repetitions of a 28-h sleep/wake cycle. The sleep dose in a standard protocol was 9.33 h per 28-h day and 4.67 h in a sleep-restricted protocol. Setting: A time-isolation laboratory at the Centre for Sleep Research, the University of South Australia. Participants: A total of 27 young healthy males participated in the study with 13 in the standard protocol (age 22.5 ± 2.2 y) and 14 in the sleep-restricted protocol (age 21.8 ± 3.8 y). Interventions: Wake periods during both protocols were approximately 4 h delayed each 28-h day relative to the circadian system, allowing performance testing at different combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. The manipulation in sleep dose between the 2 protocols, therefore, allowed the impact of sleep dose on neurobehavioral performance to be examined at various combinations of prior wake and circadian phase. Measurements and Results: Neurobehavioral function was assessed using the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). There was a sleep dose x circadian phase interaction effect on PVT performance such that sleep restriction resulted in slower and more variable response times, predominantly during the biological night. This interaction was not altered by prior wakefulness, as indicated by a nonsignificant sleep dose x circadian phase x prior wake interaction. Conclusions: The performance consequence of sleep restriction in our study was prominent during the biological night, even when the prior wake duration was short, and this performance consequence was in forms of waking state instability. This result is likely due to acute homeostatic sleep pressure remaining high despite the sleep episode.

KW - Circadian phase

KW - Forced desynchrony

KW - Neurobehavioral function

KW - Prior wake

KW - Sleep restriction

KW - State instability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959941948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5665/SLEEP.1130

DO - 10.5665/SLEEP.1130

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 931

EP - 941

JO - Sleep

T2 - Sleep

JF - Sleep

SN - 0161-8105

IS - 7

ER -

Zhou X, Ferguson SA, Matthews RW, Sargent C, Darwent D, Kennaway DJ et al. Sleep, wake and phase dependent changes in neurobehavioral function under forced desynchrony. Sleep. 2011 Jul 1;34(7):931-941. https://doi.org/10.5665/SLEEP.1130