Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF): A multicenter, randomized trial

Atul Verma, Prashanthan Sanders, Jean Champagne, Laurent Macle, Girish M. Nair, Hugh Calkins, David J. Wilber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-This study compared generalized complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation versus a selective CFAE ablation strategy targeting areas of continuous electric activity. Methods and Results-Subjects with symptomatic, persistent/high-burden paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled at 6 centers (n=86) and randomized to 1 of 2 arms. For group I, all CFAE regions with an interval confidence level >7 were ablated followed by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). For group II, only CFAE sites with continuous electric activity were ablated followed by PVI. For PVI, all 4 PV antra were isolated with confirmed entrance block. Subjects were followed for 1 year with a visit, ECG, and 48-hour Holter every 3 months. Symptoms were confirmed by loop recording. The primary end point was freedom from arrhythmia >30 seconds at 1 year. For both group I and II, CFAE ablation prolonged AF cycle length (25±33 versus 23±33 ms; P=0.78) and resulted in similar rates of AF termination (37% versus 28%; P=0.42). Radiofrequency duration during CFAE ablation was significantly less in group II (23±20 versus 38±20 minutes; P=0.002). At 1-year follow-up, freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was significantly higher in group I versus group II after 1 procedure (50% versus 28%; P=0.03). There were also significantly fewer repeat procedures in group I (13% versus 36%; P=0.021). Conclusions-Continuous electric activity ablation+PVI result in a similar incidence of acute AF termination with significantly less radiofrequency time. However, incidence of repeat procedures and long-term recurrence of AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia are significantly lower using generalized CFAE ablation+PVI.

LanguageEnglish
Pages55-62
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Ablation
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Fractionated electrograms
  • Randomized trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Verma, Atul ; Sanders, Prashanthan ; Champagne, Jean ; Macle, Laurent ; Nair, Girish M. ; Calkins, Hugh ; Wilber, David J. / Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF) : A multicenter, randomized trial. In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 55-62.
@article{62e2cd75f78c4d3d9aa6539723680df5,
title = "Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF): A multicenter, randomized trial",
abstract = "Background-This study compared generalized complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation versus a selective CFAE ablation strategy targeting areas of continuous electric activity. Methods and Results-Subjects with symptomatic, persistent/high-burden paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled at 6 centers (n=86) and randomized to 1 of 2 arms. For group I, all CFAE regions with an interval confidence level >7 were ablated followed by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). For group II, only CFAE sites with continuous electric activity were ablated followed by PVI. For PVI, all 4 PV antra were isolated with confirmed entrance block. Subjects were followed for 1 year with a visit, ECG, and 48-hour Holter every 3 months. Symptoms were confirmed by loop recording. The primary end point was freedom from arrhythmia >30 seconds at 1 year. For both group I and II, CFAE ablation prolonged AF cycle length (25±33 versus 23±33 ms; P=0.78) and resulted in similar rates of AF termination (37{\%} versus 28{\%}; P=0.42). Radiofrequency duration during CFAE ablation was significantly less in group II (23±20 versus 38±20 minutes; P=0.002). At 1-year follow-up, freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was significantly higher in group I versus group II after 1 procedure (50{\%} versus 28{\%}; P=0.03). There were also significantly fewer repeat procedures in group I (13{\%} versus 36{\%}; P=0.021). Conclusions-Continuous electric activity ablation+PVI result in a similar incidence of acute AF termination with significantly less radiofrequency time. However, incidence of repeat procedures and long-term recurrence of AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia are significantly lower using generalized CFAE ablation+PVI.",
keywords = "Ablation, Atrial fibrillation, Fractionated electrograms, Randomized trial",
author = "Atul Verma and Prashanthan Sanders and Jean Champagne and Laurent Macle and Nair, {Girish M.} and Hugh Calkins and Wilber, {David J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000890",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "55--62",
journal = "Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology",
issn = "1941-3149",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF) : A multicenter, randomized trial. / Verma, Atul; Sanders, Prashanthan; Champagne, Jean; Macle, Laurent; Nair, Girish M.; Calkins, Hugh; Wilber, David J.

In: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 55-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF)

T2 - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

AU - Verma, Atul

AU - Sanders, Prashanthan

AU - Champagne, Jean

AU - Macle, Laurent

AU - Nair, Girish M.

AU - Calkins, Hugh

AU - Wilber, David J.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background-This study compared generalized complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation versus a selective CFAE ablation strategy targeting areas of continuous electric activity. Methods and Results-Subjects with symptomatic, persistent/high-burden paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled at 6 centers (n=86) and randomized to 1 of 2 arms. For group I, all CFAE regions with an interval confidence level >7 were ablated followed by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). For group II, only CFAE sites with continuous electric activity were ablated followed by PVI. For PVI, all 4 PV antra were isolated with confirmed entrance block. Subjects were followed for 1 year with a visit, ECG, and 48-hour Holter every 3 months. Symptoms were confirmed by loop recording. The primary end point was freedom from arrhythmia >30 seconds at 1 year. For both group I and II, CFAE ablation prolonged AF cycle length (25±33 versus 23±33 ms; P=0.78) and resulted in similar rates of AF termination (37% versus 28%; P=0.42). Radiofrequency duration during CFAE ablation was significantly less in group II (23±20 versus 38±20 minutes; P=0.002). At 1-year follow-up, freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was significantly higher in group I versus group II after 1 procedure (50% versus 28%; P=0.03). There were also significantly fewer repeat procedures in group I (13% versus 36%; P=0.021). Conclusions-Continuous electric activity ablation+PVI result in a similar incidence of acute AF termination with significantly less radiofrequency time. However, incidence of repeat procedures and long-term recurrence of AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia are significantly lower using generalized CFAE ablation+PVI.

AB - Background-This study compared generalized complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation versus a selective CFAE ablation strategy targeting areas of continuous electric activity. Methods and Results-Subjects with symptomatic, persistent/high-burden paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled at 6 centers (n=86) and randomized to 1 of 2 arms. For group I, all CFAE regions with an interval confidence level >7 were ablated followed by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). For group II, only CFAE sites with continuous electric activity were ablated followed by PVI. For PVI, all 4 PV antra were isolated with confirmed entrance block. Subjects were followed for 1 year with a visit, ECG, and 48-hour Holter every 3 months. Symptoms were confirmed by loop recording. The primary end point was freedom from arrhythmia >30 seconds at 1 year. For both group I and II, CFAE ablation prolonged AF cycle length (25±33 versus 23±33 ms; P=0.78) and resulted in similar rates of AF termination (37% versus 28%; P=0.42). Radiofrequency duration during CFAE ablation was significantly less in group II (23±20 versus 38±20 minutes; P=0.002). At 1-year follow-up, freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was significantly higher in group I versus group II after 1 procedure (50% versus 28%; P=0.03). There were also significantly fewer repeat procedures in group I (13% versus 36%; P=0.021). Conclusions-Continuous electric activity ablation+PVI result in a similar incidence of acute AF termination with significantly less radiofrequency time. However, incidence of repeat procedures and long-term recurrence of AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia are significantly lower using generalized CFAE ablation+PVI.

KW - Ablation

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Fractionated electrograms

KW - Randomized trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898900397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000890

DO - 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000890

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 55

EP - 62

JO - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

JF - Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

SN - 1941-3149

IS - 1

ER -