Rheumatic heart disease in Indigenous children in northern Australia: Differences in prevalence and the challenges of screening

Kathryn V. Roberts, Graeme P. Maguire, Alex Brown, David N. Atkinson, Bo Remenyi, Gavin Wheaton, Marcus Ilton, Jonathan Carapetis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare regional differences in the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) detected by echocardiographic screening in high-risk Indigenous Australian children, and to describe the logistical and other practical challenges of RHD screening. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey performed between September 2008 and November 2010. Setting: Thirty-two remote communities in four regions of northern and central Australia. Participants: 3946 Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander children aged 5–15 years. Intervention: Portable echocardiography was performed by cardiac sonographers. Echocardiograms were recorded and reported offsite by a pool of cardiologists. Main outcome measures: RHD was diagnosed according to 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. Results: The prevalence of definite RHD differed between regions, from 4.7/1000 in Far North Queensland to 15.0/1000 in the Top End of the Northern Territory. The prevalence of definite RHD was greater in the Top End than in other regions (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.6, P = 0.01). Fifty-three per cent of detected cases of definite RHD were new cases; the prevalence of new cases of definite RHD was 4.6/1000 for the entire sample and 7.0/1000 in the Top End. Evaluation of socioeconomic data suggests that the Top End group was the most disadvantaged in our study population. Conclusions: The prevalence of definite RHD in remote Indigenous Australian children is significant, with a substantial level of undetected disease. Important differences were noted between regions, with the Top End having the highest prevalence of definite RHD, perhaps explained by socioeconomic factors. Regional differences must be considered when evaluating the potential benefit of widespread echocardiographic screening in Australia.

LanguageEnglish
Pages221.e1-221.e7
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume203
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Sep 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Roberts, Kathryn V. ; Maguire, Graeme P. ; Brown, Alex ; Atkinson, David N. ; Remenyi, Bo ; Wheaton, Gavin ; Ilton, Marcus ; Carapetis, Jonathan. / Rheumatic heart disease in Indigenous children in northern Australia : Differences in prevalence and the challenges of screening. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 2015 ; Vol. 203, No. 5. pp. 221.e1-221.e7.
@article{2e7d16d0cb2843698f5c913542a9d03f,
title = "Rheumatic heart disease in Indigenous children in northern Australia: Differences in prevalence and the challenges of screening",
abstract = "Objectives: To compare regional differences in the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) detected by echocardiographic screening in high-risk Indigenous Australian children, and to describe the logistical and other practical challenges of RHD screening. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey performed between September 2008 and November 2010. Setting: Thirty-two remote communities in four regions of northern and central Australia. Participants: 3946 Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander children aged 5–15 years. Intervention: Portable echocardiography was performed by cardiac sonographers. Echocardiograms were recorded and reported offsite by a pool of cardiologists. Main outcome measures: RHD was diagnosed according to 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. Results: The prevalence of definite RHD differed between regions, from 4.7/1000 in Far North Queensland to 15.0/1000 in the Top End of the Northern Territory. The prevalence of definite RHD was greater in the Top End than in other regions (odds ratio, 2.3; 95{\%} CI, 1.2–4.6, P = 0.01). Fifty-three per cent of detected cases of definite RHD were new cases; the prevalence of new cases of definite RHD was 4.6/1000 for the entire sample and 7.0/1000 in the Top End. Evaluation of socioeconomic data suggests that the Top End group was the most disadvantaged in our study population. Conclusions: The prevalence of definite RHD in remote Indigenous Australian children is significant, with a substantial level of undetected disease. Important differences were noted between regions, with the Top End having the highest prevalence of definite RHD, perhaps explained by socioeconomic factors. Regional differences must be considered when evaluating the potential benefit of widespread echocardiographic screening in Australia.",
author = "Roberts, {Kathryn V.} and Maguire, {Graeme P.} and Alex Brown and Atkinson, {David N.} and Bo Remenyi and Gavin Wheaton and Marcus Ilton and Jonathan Carapetis",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "7",
doi = "10.5694/mja15.00139",
language = "English",
volume = "203",
pages = "221.e1--221.e7",
journal = "The Medical journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Roberts, KV, Maguire, GP, Brown, A, Atkinson, DN, Remenyi, B, Wheaton, G, Ilton, M & Carapetis, J 2015, 'Rheumatic heart disease in Indigenous children in northern Australia: Differences in prevalence and the challenges of screening', Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 203, no. 5, pp. 221.e1-221.e7. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja15.00139

Rheumatic heart disease in Indigenous children in northern Australia : Differences in prevalence and the challenges of screening. / Roberts, Kathryn V.; Maguire, Graeme P.; Brown, Alex; Atkinson, David N.; Remenyi, Bo; Wheaton, Gavin; Ilton, Marcus; Carapetis, Jonathan.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 203, No. 5, 07.09.2015, p. 221.e1-221.e7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rheumatic heart disease in Indigenous children in northern Australia

T2 - The Medical journal of Australia

AU - Roberts, Kathryn V.

AU - Maguire, Graeme P.

AU - Brown, Alex

AU - Atkinson, David N.

AU - Remenyi, Bo

AU - Wheaton, Gavin

AU - Ilton, Marcus

AU - Carapetis, Jonathan

PY - 2015/9/7

Y1 - 2015/9/7

N2 - Objectives: To compare regional differences in the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) detected by echocardiographic screening in high-risk Indigenous Australian children, and to describe the logistical and other practical challenges of RHD screening. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey performed between September 2008 and November 2010. Setting: Thirty-two remote communities in four regions of northern and central Australia. Participants: 3946 Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander children aged 5–15 years. Intervention: Portable echocardiography was performed by cardiac sonographers. Echocardiograms were recorded and reported offsite by a pool of cardiologists. Main outcome measures: RHD was diagnosed according to 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. Results: The prevalence of definite RHD differed between regions, from 4.7/1000 in Far North Queensland to 15.0/1000 in the Top End of the Northern Territory. The prevalence of definite RHD was greater in the Top End than in other regions (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.6, P = 0.01). Fifty-three per cent of detected cases of definite RHD were new cases; the prevalence of new cases of definite RHD was 4.6/1000 for the entire sample and 7.0/1000 in the Top End. Evaluation of socioeconomic data suggests that the Top End group was the most disadvantaged in our study population. Conclusions: The prevalence of definite RHD in remote Indigenous Australian children is significant, with a substantial level of undetected disease. Important differences were noted between regions, with the Top End having the highest prevalence of definite RHD, perhaps explained by socioeconomic factors. Regional differences must be considered when evaluating the potential benefit of widespread echocardiographic screening in Australia.

AB - Objectives: To compare regional differences in the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) detected by echocardiographic screening in high-risk Indigenous Australian children, and to describe the logistical and other practical challenges of RHD screening. Design: Cross-sectional screening survey performed between September 2008 and November 2010. Setting: Thirty-two remote communities in four regions of northern and central Australia. Participants: 3946 Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander children aged 5–15 years. Intervention: Portable echocardiography was performed by cardiac sonographers. Echocardiograms were recorded and reported offsite by a pool of cardiologists. Main outcome measures: RHD was diagnosed according to 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. Results: The prevalence of definite RHD differed between regions, from 4.7/1000 in Far North Queensland to 15.0/1000 in the Top End of the Northern Territory. The prevalence of definite RHD was greater in the Top End than in other regions (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.6, P = 0.01). Fifty-three per cent of detected cases of definite RHD were new cases; the prevalence of new cases of definite RHD was 4.6/1000 for the entire sample and 7.0/1000 in the Top End. Evaluation of socioeconomic data suggests that the Top End group was the most disadvantaged in our study population. Conclusions: The prevalence of definite RHD in remote Indigenous Australian children is significant, with a substantial level of undetected disease. Important differences were noted between regions, with the Top End having the highest prevalence of definite RHD, perhaps explained by socioeconomic factors. Regional differences must be considered when evaluating the potential benefit of widespread echocardiographic screening in Australia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941036875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja15.00139

DO - 10.5694/mja15.00139

M3 - Article

VL - 203

SP - 221.e1-221.e7

JO - The Medical journal of Australia

JF - The Medical journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 5

ER -