Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology

B. W J Mol, Patricia Swart, P. M M Bossuyt, Marc Van Beurden, Fulco Van Der Veen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the diagnosis of tubal pathology, and associate reproducibility with diagnostic accuracy. Four observers evaluated 143 HSGs twice, on proximal tubal obstruction, distal tubal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and peritubal adhesions. Diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation was considered to be the reference strategy, Reproducibility (inter- and intra-observer agreement) was expressed in terms of κ-values. Accuracy was expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios, κ-values for reproducibility between observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction, substantial for distal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and moderate for adhesions. κ-values for reproducibility within observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction and substantial for distal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and adhesions. HSG had a high specificity for proximal obstruction, but a low sensitivity. Distal obstruction, absence of hydrosalpinx and adhesions had a poor accuracy. The likelihood ratio for the presence of hydrosalpinx was high. In conclusion, proximal tubal obstruction detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal obstruction from 16 to 50%. Proximal tubal patency detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal patency from 16 to 9%. It is unlikely that a lack of reproducibility of the interpretation of proximal tubal patency is responsible for the low sensitivity; alternative explanations are artefacts occurring while performing HSG or an imperfect reference strategy diagnostic laparoscopy. HSG is of limited use in diagnosing distal tubal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and has no value in the detection of peritubal adhesions.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1204-1208
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Diagnostic laparoscopy
  • Hysterosalpingography
  • Reproducibility
  • Tubal pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Mol, B. W J ; Swart, Patricia ; Bossuyt, P. M M ; Van Beurden, Marc ; Van Der Veen, Fulco. / Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology. In: Human Reproduction. 1996 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 1204-1208.
@article{be711e431b9f42968c89f9d7e4ba040f,
title = "Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology",
abstract = "The aim of the study was to estimate the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the diagnosis of tubal pathology, and associate reproducibility with diagnostic accuracy. Four observers evaluated 143 HSGs twice, on proximal tubal obstruction, distal tubal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and peritubal adhesions. Diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation was considered to be the reference strategy, Reproducibility (inter- and intra-observer agreement) was expressed in terms of κ-values. Accuracy was expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios, κ-values for reproducibility between observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction, substantial for distal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and moderate for adhesions. κ-values for reproducibility within observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction and substantial for distal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and adhesions. HSG had a high specificity for proximal obstruction, but a low sensitivity. Distal obstruction, absence of hydrosalpinx and adhesions had a poor accuracy. The likelihood ratio for the presence of hydrosalpinx was high. In conclusion, proximal tubal obstruction detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal obstruction from 16 to 50{\%}. Proximal tubal patency detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal patency from 16 to 9{\%}. It is unlikely that a lack of reproducibility of the interpretation of proximal tubal patency is responsible for the low sensitivity; alternative explanations are artefacts occurring while performing HSG or an imperfect reference strategy diagnostic laparoscopy. HSG is of limited use in diagnosing distal tubal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and has no value in the detection of peritubal adhesions.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Diagnostic laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography, Reproducibility, Tubal pathology",
author = "Mol, {B. W J} and Patricia Swart and Bossuyt, {P. M M} and {Van Beurden}, Marc and {Van Der Veen}, Fulco",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019356",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1204--1208",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology. / Mol, B. W J; Swart, Patricia; Bossuyt, P. M M; Van Beurden, Marc; Van Der Veen, Fulco.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, No. 6, 1996, p. 1204-1208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology

AU - Mol, B. W J

AU - Swart, Patricia

AU - Bossuyt, P. M M

AU - Van Beurden, Marc

AU - Van Der Veen, Fulco

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The aim of the study was to estimate the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the diagnosis of tubal pathology, and associate reproducibility with diagnostic accuracy. Four observers evaluated 143 HSGs twice, on proximal tubal obstruction, distal tubal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and peritubal adhesions. Diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation was considered to be the reference strategy, Reproducibility (inter- and intra-observer agreement) was expressed in terms of κ-values. Accuracy was expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios, κ-values for reproducibility between observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction, substantial for distal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and moderate for adhesions. κ-values for reproducibility within observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction and substantial for distal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and adhesions. HSG had a high specificity for proximal obstruction, but a low sensitivity. Distal obstruction, absence of hydrosalpinx and adhesions had a poor accuracy. The likelihood ratio for the presence of hydrosalpinx was high. In conclusion, proximal tubal obstruction detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal obstruction from 16 to 50%. Proximal tubal patency detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal patency from 16 to 9%. It is unlikely that a lack of reproducibility of the interpretation of proximal tubal patency is responsible for the low sensitivity; alternative explanations are artefacts occurring while performing HSG or an imperfect reference strategy diagnostic laparoscopy. HSG is of limited use in diagnosing distal tubal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and has no value in the detection of peritubal adhesions.

AB - The aim of the study was to estimate the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the diagnosis of tubal pathology, and associate reproducibility with diagnostic accuracy. Four observers evaluated 143 HSGs twice, on proximal tubal obstruction, distal tubal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and peritubal adhesions. Diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation was considered to be the reference strategy, Reproducibility (inter- and intra-observer agreement) was expressed in terms of κ-values. Accuracy was expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios, κ-values for reproducibility between observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction, substantial for distal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and moderate for adhesions. κ-values for reproducibility within observers were almost perfect for proximal obstruction and substantial for distal obstruction, hydrosalpinx and adhesions. HSG had a high specificity for proximal obstruction, but a low sensitivity. Distal obstruction, absence of hydrosalpinx and adhesions had a poor accuracy. The likelihood ratio for the presence of hydrosalpinx was high. In conclusion, proximal tubal obstruction detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal obstruction from 16 to 50%. Proximal tubal patency detected on HSG changes the pre-test probability of proximal tubal patency from 16 to 9%. It is unlikely that a lack of reproducibility of the interpretation of proximal tubal patency is responsible for the low sensitivity; alternative explanations are artefacts occurring while performing HSG or an imperfect reference strategy diagnostic laparoscopy. HSG is of limited use in diagnosing distal tubal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, and has no value in the detection of peritubal adhesions.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Diagnostic laparoscopy

KW - Hysterosalpingography

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Tubal pathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030038026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019356

DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019356

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1204

EP - 1208

JO - Human Reproduction

T2 - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 6

ER -