Rates and outcomes of total knee replacement for rheumatoid arthritis compared to osteoarthritis

Luke Mooney, Peter L. Lewis, David G. Campbell, Andrea Peng, Alesha Hatton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) has been shown to perform differently in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when compared to osteoarthritis (OA). In this study, we compare the survivorship between these two groups and examine patient and prosthesis factors that impact the revision rate. Methods: All RA and OA patients undergoing TKR in Australia from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2016 were included. Revision rates were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship. The cumulative percent revision analysed age, gender, prosthesis constraint and revision for infection. Results: There were 541 744 TKR procedures performed including 7542 patients with RA. RA declined as the primary diagnosis from 2.4% of all TKR in 2003 to 0.9% in 2016. Male sex was an independent revision risk in RA patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66, P < 0.001) and OA patients (3.5 years+: HR = 1.09 (1.04–1.15), P < 0.001). Male RA patients had a higher revision rate for infection than females (HR = 3.14, P < 0.001). Females with RA had a lower cumulative percent revision compared to OA females, but males showed no difference between diagnoses. Revision in RA patients was not influenced by age. Compared to OA, RA patients had a decreased revision rate for those aged <65 years, but not for patients aged ≥65 years. Conclusion: The rate of revision after TKR in RA patients is lower than those with OA, but patients with RA are at increased risk of infection, particularly the male group. Prosthesis constraint had no influence on revision rate. Mortality in those undergoing TKR with RA was higher than in those with OA.

LanguageEnglish
Pages184-190
Number of pages7
JournalANZ Journal of Surgery
Volume89
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • knee replacement
  • osteoarthritis
  • outcomes
  • revision surgery
  • rheumatoid arthritis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{7a56f1a345f64422a86e076850cbc0b7,
title = "Rates and outcomes of total knee replacement for rheumatoid arthritis compared to osteoarthritis",
abstract = "Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) has been shown to perform differently in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when compared to osteoarthritis (OA). In this study, we compare the survivorship between these two groups and examine patient and prosthesis factors that impact the revision rate. Methods: All RA and OA patients undergoing TKR in Australia from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2016 were included. Revision rates were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship. The cumulative percent revision analysed age, gender, prosthesis constraint and revision for infection. Results: There were 541 744 TKR procedures performed including 7542 patients with RA. RA declined as the primary diagnosis from 2.4{\%} of all TKR in 2003 to 0.9{\%} in 2016. Male sex was an independent revision risk in RA patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66, P < 0.001) and OA patients (3.5 years+: HR = 1.09 (1.04–1.15), P < 0.001). Male RA patients had a higher revision rate for infection than females (HR = 3.14, P < 0.001). Females with RA had a lower cumulative percent revision compared to OA females, but males showed no difference between diagnoses. Revision in RA patients was not influenced by age. Compared to OA, RA patients had a decreased revision rate for those aged <65 years, but not for patients aged ≥65 years. Conclusion: The rate of revision after TKR in RA patients is lower than those with OA, but patients with RA are at increased risk of infection, particularly the male group. Prosthesis constraint had no influence on revision rate. Mortality in those undergoing TKR with RA was higher than in those with OA.",
keywords = "knee replacement, osteoarthritis, outcomes, revision surgery, rheumatoid arthritis",
author = "Luke Mooney and Lewis, {Peter L.} and Campbell, {David G.} and Andrea Peng and Alesha Hatton",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ans.15035",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "184--190",
journal = "ANZ Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1445-1433",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Rates and outcomes of total knee replacement for rheumatoid arthritis compared to osteoarthritis. / Mooney, Luke; Lewis, Peter L.; Campbell, David G.; Peng, Andrea; Hatton, Alesha.

In: ANZ Journal of Surgery, Vol. 89, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 184-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rates and outcomes of total knee replacement for rheumatoid arthritis compared to osteoarthritis

AU - Mooney, Luke

AU - Lewis, Peter L.

AU - Campbell, David G.

AU - Peng, Andrea

AU - Hatton, Alesha

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) has been shown to perform differently in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when compared to osteoarthritis (OA). In this study, we compare the survivorship between these two groups and examine patient and prosthesis factors that impact the revision rate. Methods: All RA and OA patients undergoing TKR in Australia from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2016 were included. Revision rates were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship. The cumulative percent revision analysed age, gender, prosthesis constraint and revision for infection. Results: There were 541 744 TKR procedures performed including 7542 patients with RA. RA declined as the primary diagnosis from 2.4% of all TKR in 2003 to 0.9% in 2016. Male sex was an independent revision risk in RA patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66, P < 0.001) and OA patients (3.5 years+: HR = 1.09 (1.04–1.15), P < 0.001). Male RA patients had a higher revision rate for infection than females (HR = 3.14, P < 0.001). Females with RA had a lower cumulative percent revision compared to OA females, but males showed no difference between diagnoses. Revision in RA patients was not influenced by age. Compared to OA, RA patients had a decreased revision rate for those aged <65 years, but not for patients aged ≥65 years. Conclusion: The rate of revision after TKR in RA patients is lower than those with OA, but patients with RA are at increased risk of infection, particularly the male group. Prosthesis constraint had no influence on revision rate. Mortality in those undergoing TKR with RA was higher than in those with OA.

AB - Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) has been shown to perform differently in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when compared to osteoarthritis (OA). In this study, we compare the survivorship between these two groups and examine patient and prosthesis factors that impact the revision rate. Methods: All RA and OA patients undergoing TKR in Australia from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2016 were included. Revision rates were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship. The cumulative percent revision analysed age, gender, prosthesis constraint and revision for infection. Results: There were 541 744 TKR procedures performed including 7542 patients with RA. RA declined as the primary diagnosis from 2.4% of all TKR in 2003 to 0.9% in 2016. Male sex was an independent revision risk in RA patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66, P < 0.001) and OA patients (3.5 years+: HR = 1.09 (1.04–1.15), P < 0.001). Male RA patients had a higher revision rate for infection than females (HR = 3.14, P < 0.001). Females with RA had a lower cumulative percent revision compared to OA females, but males showed no difference between diagnoses. Revision in RA patients was not influenced by age. Compared to OA, RA patients had a decreased revision rate for those aged <65 years, but not for patients aged ≥65 years. Conclusion: The rate of revision after TKR in RA patients is lower than those with OA, but patients with RA are at increased risk of infection, particularly the male group. Prosthesis constraint had no influence on revision rate. Mortality in those undergoing TKR with RA was higher than in those with OA.

KW - knee replacement

KW - osteoarthritis

KW - outcomes

KW - revision surgery

KW - rheumatoid arthritis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061610550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ans.15035

DO - 10.1111/ans.15035

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 184

EP - 190

JO - ANZ Journal of Surgery

T2 - ANZ Journal of Surgery

JF - ANZ Journal of Surgery

SN - 1445-1433

IS - 3

ER -