Prognostic models in obstetrics: Available, but far from applicable

C. Emily Kleinrouweler, Fiona M. Cheong-See, Gary S. Collins, Anneke Kwee, Shakila Thangaratinam, Khalid S. Khan, Ben Willem J Mol, Eva Pajkrt, Karel G M Moons, Ewoud Schuit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health care provision is increasingly focused on the prediction of patients' individual risk for developing a particular health outcome in planning further tests and treatments. There has been a steady increase in the development and publication of prognostic models for various maternal and fetal outcomes in obstetrics. We undertook a systematic review to give an overview of the current status of available prognostic models in obstetrics in the context of their potential advantages and the process of developing and validating models. Important aspects to consider when assessing a prognostic model are discussed and recommendations on how to proceed on this within the obstetric domain are given. We searched MEDLINE (up to July 2012) for articles developing prognostic models in obstetrics. We identified 177 papers that reported the development of 263 prognostic models for 40 different outcomes. The most frequently predicted outcomes were preeclampsia (n = 69), preterm delivery (n = 63), mode of delivery (n = 22), gestational hypertension (n = 11), and small-for-gestational-age infants (n = 10). The performance of newer models was generally not better than that of older models predicting the same outcome. The most important measures of predictive accuracy (ie, a model's discrimination and calibration) were often (82.9%, 218/263) not both assessed. Very few developed models were validated in data other than the development data (8.7%, 23/263). Only two-thirds of the papers (62.4%, 164/263) presented the model such that validation in other populations was possible, and the clinical applicability was discussed in only 11.0% (29/263). The impact of developed models on clinical practice was unknown. We identified a large number of prognostic models in obstetrics, but there is relatively little evidence about their performance, impact, and usefulness in clinical practice so that at this point, clinical implementation cannot be recommended. New efforts should be directed toward evaluating the performance and impact of the existing models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-90.e36
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume214
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • model
  • obstetrics
  • prediction
  • pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Kleinrouweler, C. E., Cheong-See, F. M., Collins, G. S., Kwee, A., Thangaratinam, S., Khan, K. S., ... Schuit, E. (2016). Prognostic models in obstetrics: Available, but far from applicable. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 214(1), 79-90.e36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.013