Practice variation in total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of fractured neck of femur in Australia

I A Harris, A Cuthbert, R de Steiger, P Lewis, S E Graves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)


AIMS: Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) may be treated with partial (hemiarthroplasty, HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA), with recent recommendations advising that THA be used in community-ambulant patients. This study aims to determine the association between the proportion of FNF treated with THA and year of surgery, day of the week, surgeon practice, and private versus public hospitals, adjusting for known confounders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 67 620 patients in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1999 to 2016 inclusive were used to generate unadjusted and adjusted analyses of the associations between patient, time, surgeon and institution factors, and the proportion of FNF treated with THA.

RESULTS: Overall, THA was used in 23.7% of patients. THA was more frequently used over time, in younger patients, in healthier patients, in cases performed on weekdays (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.41), in private hospitals (adjusted OR 4.34; 95% CI 3.94 to 4.79) and by surgeons whose hip arthroplasty practice has a relatively higher proportion of elective patients (adjusted OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.49 to 1.83).

CONCLUSION: Practice variation exists in the proportion of FNF patients treated with THA due to variables other than patient factors. This may reflect variation in resources available and surgeon preference, and uncertainty regarding the relative indication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-95
Number of pages4
JournalBone and Joint Journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished or Issued - 2 Jan 2019


  • Journal Article

Cite this