Potential errors in pulse oximetry: II. Effects of changes in saturation and signal quality

R. K. WEBB, A. C. RALSTON, W. B. RUNCIMAN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The published studies of pulse oximeter performance under conditions of normal, high and low saturation, exercise, poor signal quality and cardiac arrhythmia are reviewed. Most pulse oximeters have an absolute mean error of less than 2% at normal saturation and perfusion; two‐thirds have a standard deviation (SD) of less than 2%, and the remainder an SD of less than 3%. Some pulse oximeters tend to read 100% with fractional saturations of 97–98%. Pulse oximeters may be suitable hyperoxic alarms for neonates if the alarm limit chosen is directly validated for each device. Pulse oximeters are poorly calibrated at low saturations and are generally less accurate and less precise than at normal saturations; nearly 30% of 244 values reviewed were in error by more than 5% at saturations of less than 80%. Ear, nose and forehead probes respond more rapidly to rapid desaturation than finger probes, but are generally less accurate and less precise. Ear oximetry may be inaccurate during exercise. Low signal quality can result in failure to present a saturation reading, but data given with low signal quality warning messages are generally no less accurate than those without. Cardiac arrhythmias do not decrease accuracy of pulse oximeters so long as saturation readings are steady.

LanguageEnglish
Pages207-212
Number of pages6
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Equipment
  • Measurement
  • pulse oximeter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

WEBB, R. K. ; RALSTON, A. C. ; RUNCIMAN, W. B. / Potential errors in pulse oximetry : II. Effects of changes in saturation and signal quality. In: Anaesthesia. 1991 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 207-212.
@article{e9fbca8297774df5b989999716c08404,
title = "Potential errors in pulse oximetry: II. Effects of changes in saturation and signal quality",
abstract = "The published studies of pulse oximeter performance under conditions of normal, high and low saturation, exercise, poor signal quality and cardiac arrhythmia are reviewed. Most pulse oximeters have an absolute mean error of less than 2{\%} at normal saturation and perfusion; two‐thirds have a standard deviation (SD) of less than 2{\%}, and the remainder an SD of less than 3{\%}. Some pulse oximeters tend to read 100{\%} with fractional saturations of 97–98{\%}. Pulse oximeters may be suitable hyperoxic alarms for neonates if the alarm limit chosen is directly validated for each device. Pulse oximeters are poorly calibrated at low saturations and are generally less accurate and less precise than at normal saturations; nearly 30{\%} of 244 values reviewed were in error by more than 5{\%} at saturations of less than 80{\%}. Ear, nose and forehead probes respond more rapidly to rapid desaturation than finger probes, but are generally less accurate and less precise. Ear oximetry may be inaccurate during exercise. Low signal quality can result in failure to present a saturation reading, but data given with low signal quality warning messages are generally no less accurate than those without. Cardiac arrhythmias do not decrease accuracy of pulse oximeters so long as saturation readings are steady.",
keywords = "Equipment, Measurement, pulse oximeter",
author = "WEBB, {R. K.} and RALSTON, {A. C.} and RUNCIMAN, {W. B.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09411.x",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "207--212",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Potential errors in pulse oximetry : II. Effects of changes in saturation and signal quality. / WEBB, R. K.; RALSTON, A. C.; RUNCIMAN, W. B.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 46, No. 3, 1991, p. 207-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential errors in pulse oximetry

T2 - Anaesthesia

AU - WEBB, R. K.

AU - RALSTON, A. C.

AU - RUNCIMAN, W. B.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The published studies of pulse oximeter performance under conditions of normal, high and low saturation, exercise, poor signal quality and cardiac arrhythmia are reviewed. Most pulse oximeters have an absolute mean error of less than 2% at normal saturation and perfusion; two‐thirds have a standard deviation (SD) of less than 2%, and the remainder an SD of less than 3%. Some pulse oximeters tend to read 100% with fractional saturations of 97–98%. Pulse oximeters may be suitable hyperoxic alarms for neonates if the alarm limit chosen is directly validated for each device. Pulse oximeters are poorly calibrated at low saturations and are generally less accurate and less precise than at normal saturations; nearly 30% of 244 values reviewed were in error by more than 5% at saturations of less than 80%. Ear, nose and forehead probes respond more rapidly to rapid desaturation than finger probes, but are generally less accurate and less precise. Ear oximetry may be inaccurate during exercise. Low signal quality can result in failure to present a saturation reading, but data given with low signal quality warning messages are generally no less accurate than those without. Cardiac arrhythmias do not decrease accuracy of pulse oximeters so long as saturation readings are steady.

AB - The published studies of pulse oximeter performance under conditions of normal, high and low saturation, exercise, poor signal quality and cardiac arrhythmia are reviewed. Most pulse oximeters have an absolute mean error of less than 2% at normal saturation and perfusion; two‐thirds have a standard deviation (SD) of less than 2%, and the remainder an SD of less than 3%. Some pulse oximeters tend to read 100% with fractional saturations of 97–98%. Pulse oximeters may be suitable hyperoxic alarms for neonates if the alarm limit chosen is directly validated for each device. Pulse oximeters are poorly calibrated at low saturations and are generally less accurate and less precise than at normal saturations; nearly 30% of 244 values reviewed were in error by more than 5% at saturations of less than 80%. Ear, nose and forehead probes respond more rapidly to rapid desaturation than finger probes, but are generally less accurate and less precise. Ear oximetry may be inaccurate during exercise. Low signal quality can result in failure to present a saturation reading, but data given with low signal quality warning messages are generally no less accurate than those without. Cardiac arrhythmias do not decrease accuracy of pulse oximeters so long as saturation readings are steady.

KW - Equipment

KW - Measurement

KW - pulse oximeter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025981812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09411.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09411.x

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 207

EP - 212

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 3

ER -