Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community

Sheryl De Lacey, Wendy Rogers, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Jodie Avery, David Smith, Bernadette Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. This study also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment. Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. We also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment.

LanguageEnglish
Pages727-744
Number of pages18
JournalReproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • community survey
  • embryo disposition
  • embryo donation
  • embryo status
  • embryo use
  • policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

De Lacey, Sheryl ; Rogers, Wendy ; Braunack-Mayer, Annette ; Avery, Jodie ; Smith, David ; Richards, Bernadette. / Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community. In: Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 727-744.
@article{102734e8213844a4ab28f9baa3418291,
title = "Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community",
abstract = "Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. This study also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment. Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. We also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment.",
keywords = "community survey, embryo disposition, embryo donation, embryo status, embryo use, policy",
author = "{De Lacey}, Sheryl and Wendy Rogers and Annette Braunack-Mayer and Jodie Avery and David Smith and Bernadette Richards",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.014",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "727--744",
journal = "Reproductive BioMedicine Online",
issn = "1472-6483",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

De Lacey, S, Rogers, W, Braunack-Mayer, A, Avery, J, Smith, D & Richards, B 2012, 'Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community', Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 727-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.014

Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community. / De Lacey, Sheryl; Rogers, Wendy; Braunack-Mayer, Annette; Avery, Jodie; Smith, David; Richards, Bernadette.

In: Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol. 24, No. 7, 01.06.2012, p. 727-744.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of embryo status and embryo use in an Australian community

AU - De Lacey, Sheryl

AU - Rogers, Wendy

AU - Braunack-Mayer, Annette

AU - Avery, Jodie

AU - Smith, David

AU - Richards, Bernadette

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. This study also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment. Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. We also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment.

AB - Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. This study also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment. Increasingly, important areas of medical therapy and research rely on the donation and use of human embryos. Yet their use is commonly determined by community tolerance and ethico-legal regulation. The aim of this study was to explore the views of an Australian community about what an embryo is, how it should be used and who should make disposition decisions. The findings of a large representative population survey showed that most participants thought of an embryo as human or potentially human but that this did not affect a majority community view that embryos should be used rather than discarded. We also found divergent views about what the community perceived to be acceptable uses of embryos. The majority perceived the couple as having the authority to make a disposition decision. Women held different views to men across all three questions. The way an embryo was perceived related significantly to how it should be used and who should decide its disposition. These differences and relationships should be considered when developing clinic practices and ethico-legal frameworks to regulate embryo use in science or treatment.

KW - community survey

KW - embryo disposition

KW - embryo donation

KW - embryo status

KW - embryo use

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862897342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.014

DO - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.014

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 727

EP - 744

JO - Reproductive BioMedicine Online

T2 - Reproductive BioMedicine Online

JF - Reproductive BioMedicine Online

SN - 1472-6483

IS - 7

ER -