Patient safety's missing link: Using clinical expertise to recognize, respond to and reduce risks at a population level

Peter D. Hibbert, Frances Healey, Tara Lamont, William M. Marela, Bruce Warner, William B. Runciman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Although incident reporting systems are widespread in health care as a strategy to reduce harm to patients, the focus has been on reporting incidents rather than responding to them. Systems containing large numbers of incidents are uniquely placed to raise awareness of, and then characterize and respond to infrequent, but significant risks. The aim of this paper is to outline a framework for the surveillance of such risks, their systematic analysis, and for the development and dissemination of population-based preventive and corrective strategies using clinical and human factors expertise. Requirements for a population-level response: The framework outlines four system requirements: To report incidents; to aggregate them; to support and conduct a risk surveillance, review and response process; and to disseminate recommendations. Personnel requirements include a non-hierarchical multidisciplinary team comprising clinicians and subject-matter and human factors experts to provide interpretation and high-level judgement from a range of perspectives. The risk surveillance, review and response process includes searching of large incident and other databases for how and why things have gone wrong, narrative analysis by clinical experts, consultation with the health care sector, and development and pilot testing of corrective strategies. Criteria for deciding which incidents require a population-level response are outlined. Discussion: The incremental cost of a population-based response function is modest compared with the 'reporting' element. Combining clinical and human factors expertise and a systematic approach underpins the creation of credible risk identification processes and the development of preventive and corrective strategies.

LanguageEnglish
Pages114-121
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • Incident reporting and analysis
  • adverse events
  • human factors
  • medical errors
  • patient safety
  • risk management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Hibbert, Peter D. ; Healey, Frances ; Lamont, Tara ; Marela, William M. ; Warner, Bruce ; Runciman, William B. / Patient safety's missing link : Using clinical expertise to recognize, respond to and reduce risks at a population level. In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 114-121.
@article{04f34e9a978d4ed88a65c7bde87fa3ad,
title = "Patient safety's missing link: Using clinical expertise to recognize, respond to and reduce risks at a population level",
abstract = "Introduction: Although incident reporting systems are widespread in health care as a strategy to reduce harm to patients, the focus has been on reporting incidents rather than responding to them. Systems containing large numbers of incidents are uniquely placed to raise awareness of, and then characterize and respond to infrequent, but significant risks. The aim of this paper is to outline a framework for the surveillance of such risks, their systematic analysis, and for the development and dissemination of population-based preventive and corrective strategies using clinical and human factors expertise. Requirements for a population-level response: The framework outlines four system requirements: To report incidents; to aggregate them; to support and conduct a risk surveillance, review and response process; and to disseminate recommendations. Personnel requirements include a non-hierarchical multidisciplinary team comprising clinicians and subject-matter and human factors experts to provide interpretation and high-level judgement from a range of perspectives. The risk surveillance, review and response process includes searching of large incident and other databases for how and why things have gone wrong, narrative analysis by clinical experts, consultation with the health care sector, and development and pilot testing of corrective strategies. Criteria for deciding which incidents require a population-level response are outlined. Discussion: The incremental cost of a population-based response function is modest compared with the 'reporting' element. Combining clinical and human factors expertise and a systematic approach underpins the creation of credible risk identification processes and the development of preventive and corrective strategies.",
keywords = "Incident reporting and analysis, adverse events, human factors, medical errors, patient safety, risk management",
author = "Hibbert, {Peter D.} and Frances Healey and Tara Lamont and Marela, {William M.} and Bruce Warner and Runciman, {William B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzv091",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "114--121",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Patient safety's missing link : Using clinical expertise to recognize, respond to and reduce risks at a population level. / Hibbert, Peter D.; Healey, Frances; Lamont, Tara; Marela, William M.; Warner, Bruce; Runciman, William B.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 114-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient safety's missing link

T2 - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

AU - Hibbert, Peter D.

AU - Healey, Frances

AU - Lamont, Tara

AU - Marela, William M.

AU - Warner, Bruce

AU - Runciman, William B.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Introduction: Although incident reporting systems are widespread in health care as a strategy to reduce harm to patients, the focus has been on reporting incidents rather than responding to them. Systems containing large numbers of incidents are uniquely placed to raise awareness of, and then characterize and respond to infrequent, but significant risks. The aim of this paper is to outline a framework for the surveillance of such risks, their systematic analysis, and for the development and dissemination of population-based preventive and corrective strategies using clinical and human factors expertise. Requirements for a population-level response: The framework outlines four system requirements: To report incidents; to aggregate them; to support and conduct a risk surveillance, review and response process; and to disseminate recommendations. Personnel requirements include a non-hierarchical multidisciplinary team comprising clinicians and subject-matter and human factors experts to provide interpretation and high-level judgement from a range of perspectives. The risk surveillance, review and response process includes searching of large incident and other databases for how and why things have gone wrong, narrative analysis by clinical experts, consultation with the health care sector, and development and pilot testing of corrective strategies. Criteria for deciding which incidents require a population-level response are outlined. Discussion: The incremental cost of a population-based response function is modest compared with the 'reporting' element. Combining clinical and human factors expertise and a systematic approach underpins the creation of credible risk identification processes and the development of preventive and corrective strategies.

AB - Introduction: Although incident reporting systems are widespread in health care as a strategy to reduce harm to patients, the focus has been on reporting incidents rather than responding to them. Systems containing large numbers of incidents are uniquely placed to raise awareness of, and then characterize and respond to infrequent, but significant risks. The aim of this paper is to outline a framework for the surveillance of such risks, their systematic analysis, and for the development and dissemination of population-based preventive and corrective strategies using clinical and human factors expertise. Requirements for a population-level response: The framework outlines four system requirements: To report incidents; to aggregate them; to support and conduct a risk surveillance, review and response process; and to disseminate recommendations. Personnel requirements include a non-hierarchical multidisciplinary team comprising clinicians and subject-matter and human factors experts to provide interpretation and high-level judgement from a range of perspectives. The risk surveillance, review and response process includes searching of large incident and other databases for how and why things have gone wrong, narrative analysis by clinical experts, consultation with the health care sector, and development and pilot testing of corrective strategies. Criteria for deciding which incidents require a population-level response are outlined. Discussion: The incremental cost of a population-based response function is modest compared with the 'reporting' element. Combining clinical and human factors expertise and a systematic approach underpins the creation of credible risk identification processes and the development of preventive and corrective strategies.

KW - Incident reporting and analysis

KW - adverse events

KW - human factors

KW - medical errors

KW - patient safety

KW - risk management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960112238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzv091

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzv091

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 114

EP - 121

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 1

ER -