Near-patient testing for serum cholesterol: Attitudes of general practitioners and patients, appropriateness, and costs

Jonathan Cohen, Leon Piterman, Louise M. McCall, Leonie Segal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and patients to near-patient testing (NPT) for serum cholesterol level, the appropriateness of NPT, and cost compared with testing in a specialist pathology laboratory. Design: A descriptive survey of registered Category 5 general practices in Victoria, 1994. Matched questionnaires were completed by GPs providing NPT and patients being tested. Participants: 13 GPs performing NPT and 206 patients having NPT. Results: Thirteen of the 17 Victorian Category 5-accredited practices participated in this study (77%), and 203 of the 260 GP questionnaires and 206 of the 260 patient questionnaires were returned. NPT of serum cholesterol level was found to be appropriately used by GPs, and recommended management guidelines for lowering cholesterol level were followed. Both GPs and patients strongly supported the role of NPT in general practice on the basis of convenience, issues of patient care, quality, efficiency and cost, but GPs felt the registration and quality assurance fees were unreasonably high. We identified potential cost savings for patients and the Health Insurance Commission with NPT of cholesterol level by GPs compared with testing at specialist pathology laboratories. Conclusions: NPT appears to be of benefit to both GPs and patients and to provide cost savings. However, the registration charges and quality assurance fees for NPT laboratories may be limiting GPs' use of NPT.

LanguageEnglish
Pages605-609
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume168
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cohen, Jonathan ; Piterman, Leon ; McCall, Louise M. ; Segal, Leonie. / Near-patient testing for serum cholesterol : Attitudes of general practitioners and patients, appropriateness, and costs. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 1998 ; Vol. 168, No. 12. pp. 605-609.
@article{a723da3debe345bc8de13bc54fca28be,
title = "Near-patient testing for serum cholesterol: Attitudes of general practitioners and patients, appropriateness, and costs",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and patients to near-patient testing (NPT) for serum cholesterol level, the appropriateness of NPT, and cost compared with testing in a specialist pathology laboratory. Design: A descriptive survey of registered Category 5 general practices in Victoria, 1994. Matched questionnaires were completed by GPs providing NPT and patients being tested. Participants: 13 GPs performing NPT and 206 patients having NPT. Results: Thirteen of the 17 Victorian Category 5-accredited practices participated in this study (77{\%}), and 203 of the 260 GP questionnaires and 206 of the 260 patient questionnaires were returned. NPT of serum cholesterol level was found to be appropriately used by GPs, and recommended management guidelines for lowering cholesterol level were followed. Both GPs and patients strongly supported the role of NPT in general practice on the basis of convenience, issues of patient care, quality, efficiency and cost, but GPs felt the registration and quality assurance fees were unreasonably high. We identified potential cost savings for patients and the Health Insurance Commission with NPT of cholesterol level by GPs compared with testing at specialist pathology laboratories. Conclusions: NPT appears to be of benefit to both GPs and patients and to provide cost savings. However, the registration charges and quality assurance fees for NPT laboratories may be limiting GPs' use of NPT.",
author = "Jonathan Cohen and Leon Piterman and McCall, {Louise M.} and Leonie Segal",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "168",
pages = "605--609",
journal = "The Medical journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Ltd",
number = "12",

}

Near-patient testing for serum cholesterol : Attitudes of general practitioners and patients, appropriateness, and costs. / Cohen, Jonathan; Piterman, Leon; McCall, Louise M.; Segal, Leonie.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 168, No. 12, 15.06.1998, p. 605-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Near-patient testing for serum cholesterol

T2 - The Medical journal of Australia

AU - Cohen, Jonathan

AU - Piterman, Leon

AU - McCall, Louise M.

AU - Segal, Leonie

PY - 1998/6/15

Y1 - 1998/6/15

N2 - Objective: To determine the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and patients to near-patient testing (NPT) for serum cholesterol level, the appropriateness of NPT, and cost compared with testing in a specialist pathology laboratory. Design: A descriptive survey of registered Category 5 general practices in Victoria, 1994. Matched questionnaires were completed by GPs providing NPT and patients being tested. Participants: 13 GPs performing NPT and 206 patients having NPT. Results: Thirteen of the 17 Victorian Category 5-accredited practices participated in this study (77%), and 203 of the 260 GP questionnaires and 206 of the 260 patient questionnaires were returned. NPT of serum cholesterol level was found to be appropriately used by GPs, and recommended management guidelines for lowering cholesterol level were followed. Both GPs and patients strongly supported the role of NPT in general practice on the basis of convenience, issues of patient care, quality, efficiency and cost, but GPs felt the registration and quality assurance fees were unreasonably high. We identified potential cost savings for patients and the Health Insurance Commission with NPT of cholesterol level by GPs compared with testing at specialist pathology laboratories. Conclusions: NPT appears to be of benefit to both GPs and patients and to provide cost savings. However, the registration charges and quality assurance fees for NPT laboratories may be limiting GPs' use of NPT.

AB - Objective: To determine the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and patients to near-patient testing (NPT) for serum cholesterol level, the appropriateness of NPT, and cost compared with testing in a specialist pathology laboratory. Design: A descriptive survey of registered Category 5 general practices in Victoria, 1994. Matched questionnaires were completed by GPs providing NPT and patients being tested. Participants: 13 GPs performing NPT and 206 patients having NPT. Results: Thirteen of the 17 Victorian Category 5-accredited practices participated in this study (77%), and 203 of the 260 GP questionnaires and 206 of the 260 patient questionnaires were returned. NPT of serum cholesterol level was found to be appropriately used by GPs, and recommended management guidelines for lowering cholesterol level were followed. Both GPs and patients strongly supported the role of NPT in general practice on the basis of convenience, issues of patient care, quality, efficiency and cost, but GPs felt the registration and quality assurance fees were unreasonably high. We identified potential cost savings for patients and the Health Insurance Commission with NPT of cholesterol level by GPs compared with testing at specialist pathology laboratories. Conclusions: NPT appears to be of benefit to both GPs and patients and to provide cost savings. However, the registration charges and quality assurance fees for NPT laboratories may be limiting GPs' use of NPT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032526932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 168

SP - 605

EP - 609

JO - The Medical journal of Australia

JF - The Medical journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 12

ER -