National Breast Cancer Audit: The use of multidisciplinary care teams by breast surgeons in Australia and New Zealand

Claire J. Marsh, Margaret Boult, Jim X. Wang, Guy J. Maddern, David M. Roder, James Kollias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To explore the involvement of members of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Section of Breast Surgery in Australia and New Zealand in multidisciplinary care (MDC) teams. Design and setting: Questionnaire sent to all full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery in December 2006. Participants: 239 of 262 active full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery (response rate, 91.2%). Main outcome measures: Surgeons' use of, and the composition and functioning of, MDC teams in public and private practice, and in metropolitan, regional and rural settings. Results: 85% of responding surgeons reported participating in at least one fully established MDC team. Public-sector teams were operationally more consistent and functional than private teams, and rural teams were less well developed than those in metropolitan and regional centres. The six core disciplines recommended by the National Breast Cancer Centre appear to be well represented in most teams. Patients and their general practitioners were not considered to be part of the treatment team by surgeons. Conclusions: MDC is supported by most breast surgeons, but there are deficits in rural areas, and in the private sector relative to the public sector.

LanguageEnglish
Pages385-386
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume188
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Marsh, Claire J. ; Boult, Margaret ; Wang, Jim X. ; Maddern, Guy J. ; Roder, David M. ; Kollias, James. / National Breast Cancer Audit : The use of multidisciplinary care teams by breast surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 2008 ; Vol. 188, No. 7. pp. 385-386.
@article{99ee862cbeab4199ab176d365910bec9,
title = "National Breast Cancer Audit: The use of multidisciplinary care teams by breast surgeons in Australia and New Zealand",
abstract = "Objective: To explore the involvement of members of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Section of Breast Surgery in Australia and New Zealand in multidisciplinary care (MDC) teams. Design and setting: Questionnaire sent to all full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery in December 2006. Participants: 239 of 262 active full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery (response rate, 91.2{\%}). Main outcome measures: Surgeons' use of, and the composition and functioning of, MDC teams in public and private practice, and in metropolitan, regional and rural settings. Results: 85{\%} of responding surgeons reported participating in at least one fully established MDC team. Public-sector teams were operationally more consistent and functional than private teams, and rural teams were less well developed than those in metropolitan and regional centres. The six core disciplines recommended by the National Breast Cancer Centre appear to be well represented in most teams. Patients and their general practitioners were not considered to be part of the treatment team by surgeons. Conclusions: MDC is supported by most breast surgeons, but there are deficits in rural areas, and in the private sector relative to the public sector.",
author = "Marsh, {Claire J.} and Margaret Boult and Wang, {Jim X.} and Maddern, {Guy J.} and Roder, {David M.} and James Kollias",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "188",
pages = "385--386",
journal = "The Medical journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Ltd",
number = "7",

}

National Breast Cancer Audit : The use of multidisciplinary care teams by breast surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. / Marsh, Claire J.; Boult, Margaret; Wang, Jim X.; Maddern, Guy J.; Roder, David M.; Kollias, James.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 188, No. 7, 07.04.2008, p. 385-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - National Breast Cancer Audit

T2 - The Medical journal of Australia

AU - Marsh, Claire J.

AU - Boult, Margaret

AU - Wang, Jim X.

AU - Maddern, Guy J.

AU - Roder, David M.

AU - Kollias, James

PY - 2008/4/7

Y1 - 2008/4/7

N2 - Objective: To explore the involvement of members of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Section of Breast Surgery in Australia and New Zealand in multidisciplinary care (MDC) teams. Design and setting: Questionnaire sent to all full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery in December 2006. Participants: 239 of 262 active full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery (response rate, 91.2%). Main outcome measures: Surgeons' use of, and the composition and functioning of, MDC teams in public and private practice, and in metropolitan, regional and rural settings. Results: 85% of responding surgeons reported participating in at least one fully established MDC team. Public-sector teams were operationally more consistent and functional than private teams, and rural teams were less well developed than those in metropolitan and regional centres. The six core disciplines recommended by the National Breast Cancer Centre appear to be well represented in most teams. Patients and their general practitioners were not considered to be part of the treatment team by surgeons. Conclusions: MDC is supported by most breast surgeons, but there are deficits in rural areas, and in the private sector relative to the public sector.

AB - Objective: To explore the involvement of members of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Section of Breast Surgery in Australia and New Zealand in multidisciplinary care (MDC) teams. Design and setting: Questionnaire sent to all full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery in December 2006. Participants: 239 of 262 active full members of the RACS Section of Breast Surgery (response rate, 91.2%). Main outcome measures: Surgeons' use of, and the composition and functioning of, MDC teams in public and private practice, and in metropolitan, regional and rural settings. Results: 85% of responding surgeons reported participating in at least one fully established MDC team. Public-sector teams were operationally more consistent and functional than private teams, and rural teams were less well developed than those in metropolitan and regional centres. The six core disciplines recommended by the National Breast Cancer Centre appear to be well represented in most teams. Patients and their general practitioners were not considered to be part of the treatment team by surgeons. Conclusions: MDC is supported by most breast surgeons, but there are deficits in rural areas, and in the private sector relative to the public sector.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46249125408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 188

SP - 385

EP - 386

JO - The Medical journal of Australia

JF - The Medical journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 7

ER -