Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Hwa Sen Chua, Sarah L. Whitehouse, Michelle Lorimer, Richard De Steiger, Linda Guo, Ross W. Crawford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis, with a significant proportion of patients having severe disease bilaterally. However, although there are differences in patient selection criteria for bilateral procedures, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for bilateral TKA. The aim of this study was to compare rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Methods: Data for over 36,000 bilateral TKAs were collected from September 1999 to December 2015. Rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality rates were obtained for simultaneous bilateral and staged procedures with intervals of 1 day-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, and 3-6 months. Yearly cumulative percent revision or cumulative percent survival with 95% confidence intervals calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were used for comparisons. Results: There was no significant difference between revision rates or reasons for revision between staged bilateral and simultaneous TKA (hazard ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.85-1.40; P =.511] for 1 day-6 weeks, 0.93 [95% CI 0.77-1.14; P =.494] for 6 weeks-3 months, and 1.10 [95% CI 0.98-1.23; P =.115] for 3-6 months). The most common reasons for revision were loosening/lysis and infection. The 30-day mortality rates were lower in the 6 weeks-3 months group than simultaneous bilaterals (P =.007). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA have similar rates of revision over the medium term but that 30-day mortality is reduced in the 6 weeks-3 months group.

LanguageEnglish
Pages3167-3173
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • bilateral knees
  • mortality
  • primary
  • registry
  • revision
  • survivorship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Chua, Hwa Sen ; Whitehouse, Sarah L. ; Lorimer, Michelle ; De Steiger, Richard ; Guo, Linda ; Crawford, Ross W. / Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 10. pp. 3167-3173.
@article{ad38d35a61ca4b628540b3362e6e5142,
title = "Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry",
abstract = "Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis, with a significant proportion of patients having severe disease bilaterally. However, although there are differences in patient selection criteria for bilateral procedures, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for bilateral TKA. The aim of this study was to compare rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Methods: Data for over 36,000 bilateral TKAs were collected from September 1999 to December 2015. Rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality rates were obtained for simultaneous bilateral and staged procedures with intervals of 1 day-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, and 3-6 months. Yearly cumulative percent revision or cumulative percent survival with 95{\%} confidence intervals calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were used for comparisons. Results: There was no significant difference between revision rates or reasons for revision between staged bilateral and simultaneous TKA (hazard ratio 1.09 [95{\%} confidence interval {CI} 0.85-1.40; P =.511] for 1 day-6 weeks, 0.93 [95{\%} CI 0.77-1.14; P =.494] for 6 weeks-3 months, and 1.10 [95{\%} CI 0.98-1.23; P =.115] for 3-6 months). The most common reasons for revision were loosening/lysis and infection. The 30-day mortality rates were lower in the 6 weeks-3 months group than simultaneous bilaterals (P =.007). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA have similar rates of revision over the medium term but that 30-day mortality is reduced in the 6 weeks-3 months group.",
keywords = "bilateral knees, mortality, primary, registry, revision, survivorship",
author = "Chua, {Hwa Sen} and Whitehouse, {Sarah L.} and Michelle Lorimer and {De Steiger}, Richard and Linda Guo and Crawford, {Ross W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "3167--3173",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "10",

}

Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. / Chua, Hwa Sen; Whitehouse, Sarah L.; Lorimer, Michelle; De Steiger, Richard; Guo, Linda; Crawford, Ross W.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 33, No. 10, 01.10.2018, p. 3167-3173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

AU - Chua, Hwa Sen

AU - Whitehouse, Sarah L.

AU - Lorimer, Michelle

AU - De Steiger, Richard

AU - Guo, Linda

AU - Crawford, Ross W.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis, with a significant proportion of patients having severe disease bilaterally. However, although there are differences in patient selection criteria for bilateral procedures, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for bilateral TKA. The aim of this study was to compare rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Methods: Data for over 36,000 bilateral TKAs were collected from September 1999 to December 2015. Rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality rates were obtained for simultaneous bilateral and staged procedures with intervals of 1 day-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, and 3-6 months. Yearly cumulative percent revision or cumulative percent survival with 95% confidence intervals calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were used for comparisons. Results: There was no significant difference between revision rates or reasons for revision between staged bilateral and simultaneous TKA (hazard ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.85-1.40; P =.511] for 1 day-6 weeks, 0.93 [95% CI 0.77-1.14; P =.494] for 6 weeks-3 months, and 1.10 [95% CI 0.98-1.23; P =.115] for 3-6 months). The most common reasons for revision were loosening/lysis and infection. The 30-day mortality rates were lower in the 6 weeks-3 months group than simultaneous bilaterals (P =.007). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA have similar rates of revision over the medium term but that 30-day mortality is reduced in the 6 weeks-3 months group.

AB - Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis, with a significant proportion of patients having severe disease bilaterally. However, although there are differences in patient selection criteria for bilateral procedures, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for bilateral TKA. The aim of this study was to compare rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Methods: Data for over 36,000 bilateral TKAs were collected from September 1999 to December 2015. Rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality rates were obtained for simultaneous bilateral and staged procedures with intervals of 1 day-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, and 3-6 months. Yearly cumulative percent revision or cumulative percent survival with 95% confidence intervals calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were used for comparisons. Results: There was no significant difference between revision rates or reasons for revision between staged bilateral and simultaneous TKA (hazard ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.85-1.40; P =.511] for 1 day-6 weeks, 0.93 [95% CI 0.77-1.14; P =.494] for 6 weeks-3 months, and 1.10 [95% CI 0.98-1.23; P =.115] for 3-6 months). The most common reasons for revision were loosening/lysis and infection. The 30-day mortality rates were lower in the 6 weeks-3 months group than simultaneous bilaterals (P =.007). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA have similar rates of revision over the medium term but that 30-day mortality is reduced in the 6 weeks-3 months group.

KW - bilateral knees

KW - mortality

KW - primary

KW - registry

KW - revision

KW - survivorship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048815756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.019

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 3167

EP - 3173

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

T2 - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 10

ER -