Mobilising evidence to improve nursing practice: A qualitative study of leadership roles and processes in four countries

Gill Harvey, Wendy Gifford, Greta Cummings, Janet Kelly, Roman Kislov, Alison Kitson, Lena Pettersson, Lars Wallin, Paul Wilson, Anna Ehrenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The approach and style of leaders is known to be an important factor influencing the translation of research evidence into nursing practice. However, questions remain as to what types of roles are most effective and the specific mechanisms through which influence is achieved. Objectives: The aim of the study was to enhance understanding of the mechanisms by which key nursing roles lead the implementation of evidence-based practice across different care settings and countries and the contextual factors that influence them. Design: The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach. Settings: Data collection was undertaken in acute care and primary/community health care settings in Australia, Canada, England and Sweden. Participants: 55 individuals representing different levels of the nursing leadership structure (executive to frontline), roles (managers and facilitators), sectors (acute and primary/community) and countries. Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with all participants exploring their roles and experiences of leading evidence-based practice. Data were analysed through a process of qualitative content analysis. Results: Different countries had varying structural arrangements and roles to support evidence-based nursing practice. At a cross-country level, three main themes were identified relating to different mechanisms for enacting evidence-based practice, contextual influences at a policy, organisational and service delivery level and challenges of leading evidence-based practice. Conclusions: National policies around quality and performance shape priorities for evidence-based practice, which in turn influences the roles and mechanisms for implementation that are given prominence. There is a need to maintain a balance between the mechanisms of managing and monitoring performance and facilitating critical questioning and reflection in and on practice. This requires a careful blending of managerial and facilitative leadership. The findings have implications for theory, practice, education and research relating to implementation and evidence-based practice.

LanguageEnglish
Pages21-30
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume90
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Evidence-based practice
  • Facilitation
  • Facilitators
  • Implementation
  • Knowledge translation
  • Leadership
  • Managers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Harvey, Gill ; Gifford, Wendy ; Cummings, Greta ; Kelly, Janet ; Kislov, Roman ; Kitson, Alison ; Pettersson, Lena ; Wallin, Lars ; Wilson, Paul ; Ehrenberg, Anna. / Mobilising evidence to improve nursing practice : A qualitative study of leadership roles and processes in four countries. In: International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 90. pp. 21-30.
@article{1f544ce19cdc4031aded00333796d24e,
title = "Mobilising evidence to improve nursing practice: A qualitative study of leadership roles and processes in four countries",
abstract = "Background: The approach and style of leaders is known to be an important factor influencing the translation of research evidence into nursing practice. However, questions remain as to what types of roles are most effective and the specific mechanisms through which influence is achieved. Objectives: The aim of the study was to enhance understanding of the mechanisms by which key nursing roles lead the implementation of evidence-based practice across different care settings and countries and the contextual factors that influence them. Design: The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach. Settings: Data collection was undertaken in acute care and primary/community health care settings in Australia, Canada, England and Sweden. Participants: 55 individuals representing different levels of the nursing leadership structure (executive to frontline), roles (managers and facilitators), sectors (acute and primary/community) and countries. Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with all participants exploring their roles and experiences of leading evidence-based practice. Data were analysed through a process of qualitative content analysis. Results: Different countries had varying structural arrangements and roles to support evidence-based nursing practice. At a cross-country level, three main themes were identified relating to different mechanisms for enacting evidence-based practice, contextual influences at a policy, organisational and service delivery level and challenges of leading evidence-based practice. Conclusions: National policies around quality and performance shape priorities for evidence-based practice, which in turn influences the roles and mechanisms for implementation that are given prominence. There is a need to maintain a balance between the mechanisms of managing and monitoring performance and facilitating critical questioning and reflection in and on practice. This requires a careful blending of managerial and facilitative leadership. The findings have implications for theory, practice, education and research relating to implementation and evidence-based practice.",
keywords = "Evidence-based practice, Facilitation, Facilitators, Implementation, Knowledge translation, Leadership, Managers",
author = "Gill Harvey and Wendy Gifford and Greta Cummings and Janet Kelly and Roman Kislov and Alison Kitson and Lena Pettersson and Lars Wallin and Paul Wilson and Anna Ehrenberg",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.017",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "21--30",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Harvey, G, Gifford, W, Cummings, G, Kelly, J, Kislov, R, Kitson, A, Pettersson, L, Wallin, L, Wilson, P & Ehrenberg, A 2019, 'Mobilising evidence to improve nursing practice: A qualitative study of leadership roles and processes in four countries', International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 90, pp. 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.017

Mobilising evidence to improve nursing practice : A qualitative study of leadership roles and processes in four countries. / Harvey, Gill; Gifford, Wendy; Cummings, Greta; Kelly, Janet; Kislov, Roman; Kitson, Alison; Pettersson, Lena; Wallin, Lars; Wilson, Paul; Ehrenberg, Anna.

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 90, 01.02.2019, p. 21-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobilising evidence to improve nursing practice

T2 - International Journal of Nursing Studies

AU - Harvey, Gill

AU - Gifford, Wendy

AU - Cummings, Greta

AU - Kelly, Janet

AU - Kislov, Roman

AU - Kitson, Alison

AU - Pettersson, Lena

AU - Wallin, Lars

AU - Wilson, Paul

AU - Ehrenberg, Anna

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Background: The approach and style of leaders is known to be an important factor influencing the translation of research evidence into nursing practice. However, questions remain as to what types of roles are most effective and the specific mechanisms through which influence is achieved. Objectives: The aim of the study was to enhance understanding of the mechanisms by which key nursing roles lead the implementation of evidence-based practice across different care settings and countries and the contextual factors that influence them. Design: The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach. Settings: Data collection was undertaken in acute care and primary/community health care settings in Australia, Canada, England and Sweden. Participants: 55 individuals representing different levels of the nursing leadership structure (executive to frontline), roles (managers and facilitators), sectors (acute and primary/community) and countries. Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with all participants exploring their roles and experiences of leading evidence-based practice. Data were analysed through a process of qualitative content analysis. Results: Different countries had varying structural arrangements and roles to support evidence-based nursing practice. At a cross-country level, three main themes were identified relating to different mechanisms for enacting evidence-based practice, contextual influences at a policy, organisational and service delivery level and challenges of leading evidence-based practice. Conclusions: National policies around quality and performance shape priorities for evidence-based practice, which in turn influences the roles and mechanisms for implementation that are given prominence. There is a need to maintain a balance between the mechanisms of managing and monitoring performance and facilitating critical questioning and reflection in and on practice. This requires a careful blending of managerial and facilitative leadership. The findings have implications for theory, practice, education and research relating to implementation and evidence-based practice.

AB - Background: The approach and style of leaders is known to be an important factor influencing the translation of research evidence into nursing practice. However, questions remain as to what types of roles are most effective and the specific mechanisms through which influence is achieved. Objectives: The aim of the study was to enhance understanding of the mechanisms by which key nursing roles lead the implementation of evidence-based practice across different care settings and countries and the contextual factors that influence them. Design: The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach. Settings: Data collection was undertaken in acute care and primary/community health care settings in Australia, Canada, England and Sweden. Participants: 55 individuals representing different levels of the nursing leadership structure (executive to frontline), roles (managers and facilitators), sectors (acute and primary/community) and countries. Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with all participants exploring their roles and experiences of leading evidence-based practice. Data were analysed through a process of qualitative content analysis. Results: Different countries had varying structural arrangements and roles to support evidence-based nursing practice. At a cross-country level, three main themes were identified relating to different mechanisms for enacting evidence-based practice, contextual influences at a policy, organisational and service delivery level and challenges of leading evidence-based practice. Conclusions: National policies around quality and performance shape priorities for evidence-based practice, which in turn influences the roles and mechanisms for implementation that are given prominence. There is a need to maintain a balance between the mechanisms of managing and monitoring performance and facilitating critical questioning and reflection in and on practice. This requires a careful blending of managerial and facilitative leadership. The findings have implications for theory, practice, education and research relating to implementation and evidence-based practice.

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Facilitation

KW - Facilitators

KW - Implementation

KW - Knowledge translation

KW - Leadership

KW - Managers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058064165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.017

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 21

EP - 30

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

ER -