Is there evidence for a surgeon learning curve for endothelial keratoplasty in Australia?

on behalf of Contributors to the Australian Corneal Graft Registry, Miriam Keane, Richard A.D. Mills, Douglas J. Coster, Keryn Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: Expected outcomes from endokeratoplasty may vary with surgeon experience. Background: It was explored whether a surgeon learning curve exists for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties (manual or automated) performed in Australia. Design: This is a prospective cohort study, with various clinical settings. Participants: There were 2139 recipients of 2615 endothelial grafts, registered by 85 surgeons between January 2006 and December 2013. Methods: Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine longitudinal graft survival. Manual and automated Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties were analysed together. Pearson chi-squared analyses were performed to examine differences amongst groups. Continuity correction was used for 2 × 2 tests, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 (two-sided). Main outcome measure: The main parameter measured was endothelial graft survival. Results: Survival of the first 56 registered grafts was significantly poorer than survival of subsequent grafts (χ2 = 8.83, df = 1, P = 0.003), when data were combined for all surgeons. Surgeon workload influenced graft survival significantly (P < 0.001). This variable was retained in multivariate analysis designed to investigate independent factors influencing graft survival. Primary non-functioning grafts were significantly less likely to be reported for endokeratoplasties performed by surgeons with more than 56 registered grafts, compared with those registering 56 or fewer grafts (4.3% vs. 8.5%; χ2 = 18.38, df = 1, P < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings suggest that for less experienced or low-volume surgeons, longitudinal graft survival improved once 56 or more endokeratoplasties had been performed, indicative of a learning curve. The learning curve was less apparent for surgeons with 57 or more Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties and/or Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasties registered during the 8-year study period. Different learning curves may be anticipated for these two groups of surgeons.

LanguageEnglish
Pages575-583
Number of pages9
JournalClinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • DSAEK
  • DSEK
  • endokeratoplasty
  • graft survival
  • surgeon learning curve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

on behalf of Contributors to the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. / Is there evidence for a surgeon learning curve for endothelial keratoplasty in Australia?. In: Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 6. pp. 575-583.
@article{ec5416ad5d36429282393aa039884dc7,
title = "Is there evidence for a surgeon learning curve for endothelial keratoplasty in Australia?",
abstract = "Importance: Expected outcomes from endokeratoplasty may vary with surgeon experience. Background: It was explored whether a surgeon learning curve exists for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties (manual or automated) performed in Australia. Design: This is a prospective cohort study, with various clinical settings. Participants: There were 2139 recipients of 2615 endothelial grafts, registered by 85 surgeons between January 2006 and December 2013. Methods: Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine longitudinal graft survival. Manual and automated Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties were analysed together. Pearson chi-squared analyses were performed to examine differences amongst groups. Continuity correction was used for 2 × 2 tests, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 (two-sided). Main outcome measure: The main parameter measured was endothelial graft survival. Results: Survival of the first 56 registered grafts was significantly poorer than survival of subsequent grafts (χ2 = 8.83, df = 1, P = 0.003), when data were combined for all surgeons. Surgeon workload influenced graft survival significantly (P < 0.001). This variable was retained in multivariate analysis designed to investigate independent factors influencing graft survival. Primary non-functioning grafts were significantly less likely to be reported for endokeratoplasties performed by surgeons with more than 56 registered grafts, compared with those registering 56 or fewer grafts (4.3{\%} vs. 8.5{\%}; χ2 = 18.38, df = 1, P < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings suggest that for less experienced or low-volume surgeons, longitudinal graft survival improved once 56 or more endokeratoplasties had been performed, indicative of a learning curve. The learning curve was less apparent for surgeons with 57 or more Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties and/or Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasties registered during the 8-year study period. Different learning curves may be anticipated for these two groups of surgeons.",
keywords = "DSAEK, DSEK, endokeratoplasty, graft survival, surgeon learning curve",
author = "{on behalf of Contributors to the Australian Corneal Graft Registry} and Miriam Keane and Mills, {Richard A.D.} and Coster, {Douglas J.} and Keryn Williams",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ceo.12921",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "575--583",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology",
issn = "1442-6404",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

on behalf of Contributors to the Australian Corneal Graft Registry 2017, 'Is there evidence for a surgeon learning curve for endothelial keratoplasty in Australia?', Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12921

Is there evidence for a surgeon learning curve for endothelial keratoplasty in Australia? / on behalf of Contributors to the Australian Corneal Graft Registry.

In: Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Vol. 45, No. 6, 01.08.2017, p. 575-583.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there evidence for a surgeon learning curve for endothelial keratoplasty in Australia?

AU - on behalf of Contributors to the Australian Corneal Graft Registry

AU - Keane, Miriam

AU - Mills, Richard A.D.

AU - Coster, Douglas J.

AU - Williams, Keryn

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Importance: Expected outcomes from endokeratoplasty may vary with surgeon experience. Background: It was explored whether a surgeon learning curve exists for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties (manual or automated) performed in Australia. Design: This is a prospective cohort study, with various clinical settings. Participants: There were 2139 recipients of 2615 endothelial grafts, registered by 85 surgeons between January 2006 and December 2013. Methods: Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine longitudinal graft survival. Manual and automated Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties were analysed together. Pearson chi-squared analyses were performed to examine differences amongst groups. Continuity correction was used for 2 × 2 tests, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 (two-sided). Main outcome measure: The main parameter measured was endothelial graft survival. Results: Survival of the first 56 registered grafts was significantly poorer than survival of subsequent grafts (χ2 = 8.83, df = 1, P = 0.003), when data were combined for all surgeons. Surgeon workload influenced graft survival significantly (P < 0.001). This variable was retained in multivariate analysis designed to investigate independent factors influencing graft survival. Primary non-functioning grafts were significantly less likely to be reported for endokeratoplasties performed by surgeons with more than 56 registered grafts, compared with those registering 56 or fewer grafts (4.3% vs. 8.5%; χ2 = 18.38, df = 1, P < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings suggest that for less experienced or low-volume surgeons, longitudinal graft survival improved once 56 or more endokeratoplasties had been performed, indicative of a learning curve. The learning curve was less apparent for surgeons with 57 or more Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties and/or Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasties registered during the 8-year study period. Different learning curves may be anticipated for these two groups of surgeons.

AB - Importance: Expected outcomes from endokeratoplasty may vary with surgeon experience. Background: It was explored whether a surgeon learning curve exists for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties (manual or automated) performed in Australia. Design: This is a prospective cohort study, with various clinical settings. Participants: There were 2139 recipients of 2615 endothelial grafts, registered by 85 surgeons between January 2006 and December 2013. Methods: Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine longitudinal graft survival. Manual and automated Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties were analysed together. Pearson chi-squared analyses were performed to examine differences amongst groups. Continuity correction was used for 2 × 2 tests, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 (two-sided). Main outcome measure: The main parameter measured was endothelial graft survival. Results: Survival of the first 56 registered grafts was significantly poorer than survival of subsequent grafts (χ2 = 8.83, df = 1, P = 0.003), when data were combined for all surgeons. Surgeon workload influenced graft survival significantly (P < 0.001). This variable was retained in multivariate analysis designed to investigate independent factors influencing graft survival. Primary non-functioning grafts were significantly less likely to be reported for endokeratoplasties performed by surgeons with more than 56 registered grafts, compared with those registering 56 or fewer grafts (4.3% vs. 8.5%; χ2 = 18.38, df = 1, P < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings suggest that for less experienced or low-volume surgeons, longitudinal graft survival improved once 56 or more endokeratoplasties had been performed, indicative of a learning curve. The learning curve was less apparent for surgeons with 57 or more Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasties and/or Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasties registered during the 8-year study period. Different learning curves may be anticipated for these two groups of surgeons.

KW - DSAEK

KW - DSEK

KW - endokeratoplasty

KW - graft survival

KW - surgeon learning curve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013930043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ceo.12921

DO - 10.1111/ceo.12921

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 575

EP - 583

JO - Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

T2 - Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

JF - Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

SN - 1442-6404

IS - 6

ER -