Investing to protect our children: Using economics to derive an evidence-based strategy

Leonie Segal, Kim Dalziel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Child abuse and neglect are global problems that affect over 25 per cent of children and have serious health, social and economic consequences. Government and other agencies are heavily committed to the provision of services to address the consequences of abuse and neglect. In a climate of scarce resources, there is increasing interest in developing cost-effective strategies to prevent child maltreatment. Economic evaluation in the context of formal 'priority setting' can contribute to the development of an efficient child protection strategy and at the same time develop the arguments to support an increased investment in the prevention of child maltreatment. Key challenges arise from incompleteness of the evidence base of effective interventions and the considerable complexity of the cross-portfolio effects. The latter has resulted in the widespread failure to capture the full range of impacts, most notably intergenerational effects, quality of life and mortality. This means the benefits of investing in effective preventive strategies to address child maltreatment will be underestimated and too few resources allocated to this important task. Adoption of the proposed priority-setting framework and translation into action are likely to reduce child maltreatment and associated harms for children at risk now and in the future.

    LanguageEnglish
    Pages274-289
    Number of pages16
    JournalChild Abuse Review
    Volume20
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

    Keywords

    • Child maltreatment
    • Economic evaluation
    • Priority setting

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
    • Law

    Cite this

    Segal, Leonie ; Dalziel, Kim. / Investing to protect our children : Using economics to derive an evidence-based strategy. In: Child Abuse Review. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 274-289.
    @article{15f9e3074bf14893a4c15edcbd715d5d,
    title = "Investing to protect our children: Using economics to derive an evidence-based strategy",
    abstract = "Child abuse and neglect are global problems that affect over 25 per cent of children and have serious health, social and economic consequences. Government and other agencies are heavily committed to the provision of services to address the consequences of abuse and neglect. In a climate of scarce resources, there is increasing interest in developing cost-effective strategies to prevent child maltreatment. Economic evaluation in the context of formal 'priority setting' can contribute to the development of an efficient child protection strategy and at the same time develop the arguments to support an increased investment in the prevention of child maltreatment. Key challenges arise from incompleteness of the evidence base of effective interventions and the considerable complexity of the cross-portfolio effects. The latter has resulted in the widespread failure to capture the full range of impacts, most notably intergenerational effects, quality of life and mortality. This means the benefits of investing in effective preventive strategies to address child maltreatment will be underestimated and too few resources allocated to this important task. Adoption of the proposed priority-setting framework and translation into action are likely to reduce child maltreatment and associated harms for children at risk now and in the future.",
    keywords = "Child maltreatment, Economic evaluation, Priority setting",
    author = "Leonie Segal and Kim Dalziel",
    year = "2011",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1002/car.1192",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "274--289",
    journal = "Child Abuse Review",
    issn = "0952-9136",
    publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
    number = "4",

    }

    Investing to protect our children : Using economics to derive an evidence-based strategy. / Segal, Leonie; Dalziel, Kim.

    In: Child Abuse Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, 07.2011, p. 274-289.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Investing to protect our children

    T2 - Child Abuse Review

    AU - Segal, Leonie

    AU - Dalziel, Kim

    PY - 2011/7

    Y1 - 2011/7

    N2 - Child abuse and neglect are global problems that affect over 25 per cent of children and have serious health, social and economic consequences. Government and other agencies are heavily committed to the provision of services to address the consequences of abuse and neglect. In a climate of scarce resources, there is increasing interest in developing cost-effective strategies to prevent child maltreatment. Economic evaluation in the context of formal 'priority setting' can contribute to the development of an efficient child protection strategy and at the same time develop the arguments to support an increased investment in the prevention of child maltreatment. Key challenges arise from incompleteness of the evidence base of effective interventions and the considerable complexity of the cross-portfolio effects. The latter has resulted in the widespread failure to capture the full range of impacts, most notably intergenerational effects, quality of life and mortality. This means the benefits of investing in effective preventive strategies to address child maltreatment will be underestimated and too few resources allocated to this important task. Adoption of the proposed priority-setting framework and translation into action are likely to reduce child maltreatment and associated harms for children at risk now and in the future.

    AB - Child abuse and neglect are global problems that affect over 25 per cent of children and have serious health, social and economic consequences. Government and other agencies are heavily committed to the provision of services to address the consequences of abuse and neglect. In a climate of scarce resources, there is increasing interest in developing cost-effective strategies to prevent child maltreatment. Economic evaluation in the context of formal 'priority setting' can contribute to the development of an efficient child protection strategy and at the same time develop the arguments to support an increased investment in the prevention of child maltreatment. Key challenges arise from incompleteness of the evidence base of effective interventions and the considerable complexity of the cross-portfolio effects. The latter has resulted in the widespread failure to capture the full range of impacts, most notably intergenerational effects, quality of life and mortality. This means the benefits of investing in effective preventive strategies to address child maltreatment will be underestimated and too few resources allocated to this important task. Adoption of the proposed priority-setting framework and translation into action are likely to reduce child maltreatment and associated harms for children at risk now and in the future.

    KW - Child maltreatment

    KW - Economic evaluation

    KW - Priority setting

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960369938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/car.1192

    DO - 10.1002/car.1192

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 274

    EP - 289

    JO - Child Abuse Review

    JF - Child Abuse Review

    SN - 0952-9136

    IS - 4

    ER -