Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: A cohort study

P. A L Kop, M. Van Wely, B. W. Mol, A. A. De Melker, P. M W Janssens, B. Arends, M. H J M Curfs, M. Kortman, A. Nap, E. Rijnders, J. P W R Roovers, H. Ruis, A. H M Simons, S. Repping, F. Van Der Veen, M. H. Mochtar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

studyquestion: Does intrauterine insemination in the natural cycle lead to better pregnancy rates than intracervical insemination (ICI) in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. summaryanswer: In a large cohort of women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm, there was no substantial beneficial effect of IUI in the natural cycle over ICI in the natural cycle. what is known already: At present, there are no studies comparing IUI in the natural cycle versus ICI in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study design, size, duration: We performed a retrospective cohort study among all eight sperm banks in the Netherlands.We included all women who underwent artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle between January 2009 and December 2010.We compared time to ongoing pregnancy in the first six cycles of IUI and ICI, after which controlled ovarian stimulation was commenced. Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) over time were compared using life tables.ACox proportional hazard modelwas used to compare the chances of reaching an ongoing pregnancy after IUI or ICI adjusted for female age and indication. participants/materials, setting, methods: We included 1843 women; 1163 women underwent 4269 cycles of IUI and 680 women underwent 2345 cycles of ICI with cryopreserved donor sperm. main results and the role of chance: Baseline characteristics were equally distributed (mean age 34.0 years for the IUI group versus 33.8 years for the ICI group), while in the IUI group, there were more lesbian women than in the ICI group (40.6% for IUI compared with 31.8% for ICI). CumulativeOPRs up to six treatment cycleswere 40.5% for IUI and 37.9% for ICI. This corresponds with a hazard rate ratio of 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23] after controlling for female age and indication. Increasing female age was associated with a lowerOPR, in both the IUI and ICI groups with a hazard ratio for ongoing pregnancy of 0.94 per year (95% CI 0.93-0.97). limitations, reasons for caution: This study is prone to selection bias due to its retrospective nature. As potential confounders such as parity and duration of subfertility were not registered, the effect of these potential confounders could not be evaluated. wider implications of the findings: In women inseminated with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle, we found no substantial benefit of IUI over ICI.Arandomized controlled trial with economic analysis alongside, it is needed to allow amoredefinitive conclusion on the cost-effectiveness of insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study funding/competing interest(s): No funding was used and no conflicts of interest are declared.

LanguageEnglish
Pages603-607
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • Cryopreservation
  • Donor sperm
  • Intracervical insemination
  • Intrauterine insemination
  • Natural cycle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Kop, P. A. L., Van Wely, M., Mol, B. W., De Melker, A. A., Janssens, P. M. W., Arends, B., ... Mochtar, M. H. (2015). Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: A cohort study. Human Reproduction, 30(3), 603-607. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev004
Kop, P. A L ; Van Wely, M. ; Mol, B. W. ; De Melker, A. A. ; Janssens, P. M W ; Arends, B. ; Curfs, M. H J M ; Kortman, M. ; Nap, A. ; Rijnders, E. ; Roovers, J. P W R ; Ruis, H. ; Simons, A. H M ; Repping, S. ; Van Der Veen, F. ; Mochtar, M. H. / Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle : A cohort study. In: Human Reproduction. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 603-607.
@article{69e2f0c7e75e4de987afb45256f61552,
title = "Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: A cohort study",
abstract = "studyquestion: Does intrauterine insemination in the natural cycle lead to better pregnancy rates than intracervical insemination (ICI) in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. summaryanswer: In a large cohort of women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm, there was no substantial beneficial effect of IUI in the natural cycle over ICI in the natural cycle. what is known already: At present, there are no studies comparing IUI in the natural cycle versus ICI in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study design, size, duration: We performed a retrospective cohort study among all eight sperm banks in the Netherlands.We included all women who underwent artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle between January 2009 and December 2010.We compared time to ongoing pregnancy in the first six cycles of IUI and ICI, after which controlled ovarian stimulation was commenced. Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) over time were compared using life tables.ACox proportional hazard modelwas used to compare the chances of reaching an ongoing pregnancy after IUI or ICI adjusted for female age and indication. participants/materials, setting, methods: We included 1843 women; 1163 women underwent 4269 cycles of IUI and 680 women underwent 2345 cycles of ICI with cryopreserved donor sperm. main results and the role of chance: Baseline characteristics were equally distributed (mean age 34.0 years for the IUI group versus 33.8 years for the ICI group), while in the IUI group, there were more lesbian women than in the ICI group (40.6{\%} for IUI compared with 31.8{\%} for ICI). CumulativeOPRs up to six treatment cycleswere 40.5{\%} for IUI and 37.9{\%} for ICI. This corresponds with a hazard rate ratio of 1.02 [95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23] after controlling for female age and indication. Increasing female age was associated with a lowerOPR, in both the IUI and ICI groups with a hazard ratio for ongoing pregnancy of 0.94 per year (95{\%} CI 0.93-0.97). limitations, reasons for caution: This study is prone to selection bias due to its retrospective nature. As potential confounders such as parity and duration of subfertility were not registered, the effect of these potential confounders could not be evaluated. wider implications of the findings: In women inseminated with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle, we found no substantial benefit of IUI over ICI.Arandomized controlled trial with economic analysis alongside, it is needed to allow amoredefinitive conclusion on the cost-effectiveness of insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study funding/competing interest(s): No funding was used and no conflicts of interest are declared.",
keywords = "Cryopreservation, Donor sperm, Intracervical insemination, Intrauterine insemination, Natural cycle",
author = "Kop, {P. A L} and {Van Wely}, M. and Mol, {B. W.} and {De Melker}, {A. A.} and Janssens, {P. M W} and B. Arends and Curfs, {M. H J M} and M. Kortman and A. Nap and E. Rijnders and Roovers, {J. P W R} and H. Ruis and Simons, {A. H M} and S. Repping and {Van Der Veen}, F. and Mochtar, {M. H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/dev004",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "603--607",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Kop, PAL, Van Wely, M, Mol, BW, De Melker, AA, Janssens, PMW, Arends, B, Curfs, MHJM, Kortman, M, Nap, A, Rijnders, E, Roovers, JPWR, Ruis, H, Simons, AHM, Repping, S, Van Der Veen, F & Mochtar, MH 2015, 'Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: A cohort study', Human Reproduction, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 603-607. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev004

Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle : A cohort study. / Kop, P. A L; Van Wely, M.; Mol, B. W.; De Melker, A. A.; Janssens, P. M W; Arends, B.; Curfs, M. H J M; Kortman, M.; Nap, A.; Rijnders, E.; Roovers, J. P W R; Ruis, H.; Simons, A. H M; Repping, S.; Van Der Veen, F.; Mochtar, M. H.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 603-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle

T2 - Human Reproduction

AU - Kop, P. A L

AU - Van Wely, M.

AU - Mol, B. W.

AU - De Melker, A. A.

AU - Janssens, P. M W

AU - Arends, B.

AU - Curfs, M. H J M

AU - Kortman, M.

AU - Nap, A.

AU - Rijnders, E.

AU - Roovers, J. P W R

AU - Ruis, H.

AU - Simons, A. H M

AU - Repping, S.

AU - Van Der Veen, F.

AU - Mochtar, M. H.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - studyquestion: Does intrauterine insemination in the natural cycle lead to better pregnancy rates than intracervical insemination (ICI) in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. summaryanswer: In a large cohort of women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm, there was no substantial beneficial effect of IUI in the natural cycle over ICI in the natural cycle. what is known already: At present, there are no studies comparing IUI in the natural cycle versus ICI in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study design, size, duration: We performed a retrospective cohort study among all eight sperm banks in the Netherlands.We included all women who underwent artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle between January 2009 and December 2010.We compared time to ongoing pregnancy in the first six cycles of IUI and ICI, after which controlled ovarian stimulation was commenced. Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) over time were compared using life tables.ACox proportional hazard modelwas used to compare the chances of reaching an ongoing pregnancy after IUI or ICI adjusted for female age and indication. participants/materials, setting, methods: We included 1843 women; 1163 women underwent 4269 cycles of IUI and 680 women underwent 2345 cycles of ICI with cryopreserved donor sperm. main results and the role of chance: Baseline characteristics were equally distributed (mean age 34.0 years for the IUI group versus 33.8 years for the ICI group), while in the IUI group, there were more lesbian women than in the ICI group (40.6% for IUI compared with 31.8% for ICI). CumulativeOPRs up to six treatment cycleswere 40.5% for IUI and 37.9% for ICI. This corresponds with a hazard rate ratio of 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23] after controlling for female age and indication. Increasing female age was associated with a lowerOPR, in both the IUI and ICI groups with a hazard ratio for ongoing pregnancy of 0.94 per year (95% CI 0.93-0.97). limitations, reasons for caution: This study is prone to selection bias due to its retrospective nature. As potential confounders such as parity and duration of subfertility were not registered, the effect of these potential confounders could not be evaluated. wider implications of the findings: In women inseminated with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle, we found no substantial benefit of IUI over ICI.Arandomized controlled trial with economic analysis alongside, it is needed to allow amoredefinitive conclusion on the cost-effectiveness of insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study funding/competing interest(s): No funding was used and no conflicts of interest are declared.

AB - studyquestion: Does intrauterine insemination in the natural cycle lead to better pregnancy rates than intracervical insemination (ICI) in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. summaryanswer: In a large cohort of women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm, there was no substantial beneficial effect of IUI in the natural cycle over ICI in the natural cycle. what is known already: At present, there are no studies comparing IUI in the natural cycle versus ICI in the natural cycle in women undergoing artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study design, size, duration: We performed a retrospective cohort study among all eight sperm banks in the Netherlands.We included all women who underwent artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle between January 2009 and December 2010.We compared time to ongoing pregnancy in the first six cycles of IUI and ICI, after which controlled ovarian stimulation was commenced. Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) over time were compared using life tables.ACox proportional hazard modelwas used to compare the chances of reaching an ongoing pregnancy after IUI or ICI adjusted for female age and indication. participants/materials, setting, methods: We included 1843 women; 1163 women underwent 4269 cycles of IUI and 680 women underwent 2345 cycles of ICI with cryopreserved donor sperm. main results and the role of chance: Baseline characteristics were equally distributed (mean age 34.0 years for the IUI group versus 33.8 years for the ICI group), while in the IUI group, there were more lesbian women than in the ICI group (40.6% for IUI compared with 31.8% for ICI). CumulativeOPRs up to six treatment cycleswere 40.5% for IUI and 37.9% for ICI. This corresponds with a hazard rate ratio of 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23] after controlling for female age and indication. Increasing female age was associated with a lowerOPR, in both the IUI and ICI groups with a hazard ratio for ongoing pregnancy of 0.94 per year (95% CI 0.93-0.97). limitations, reasons for caution: This study is prone to selection bias due to its retrospective nature. As potential confounders such as parity and duration of subfertility were not registered, the effect of these potential confounders could not be evaluated. wider implications of the findings: In women inseminated with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle, we found no substantial benefit of IUI over ICI.Arandomized controlled trial with economic analysis alongside, it is needed to allow amoredefinitive conclusion on the cost-effectiveness of insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm. study funding/competing interest(s): No funding was used and no conflicts of interest are declared.

KW - Cryopreservation

KW - Donor sperm

KW - Intracervical insemination

KW - Intrauterine insemination

KW - Natural cycle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84935058974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/dev004

DO - 10.1093/humrep/dev004

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 603

EP - 607

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 3

ER -