Interobserver reproducibility of the halfway grading system: A scoring system for assessment of pelvic organ prolapse

P. M A J Geomini, B. W J Mol, G. L. Bremer, H. A M Brolmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System, a scoring system for pelvic organ prolapse. Thirty-six women who underwent abdominal sacroealpopexy were examined by two gynecalogists who were blinded for the medical history and current symptoms of the cooperating women as well as for each other's results. The amount of prolapse of urethra, bladder, cervix, cul de sac, rectum, and perineum was scored on a 5-point scale. The amount of agreement in the judgment of the observers that was expected beyond chance was expressed with a weighted kappa statistic. The overall kappa statistic was 0.59 (95% CI 0.37-0.80). The kappa statistics per anatomic site of greatest prolapse and the site-specific kappa statistics were even lower. The moderate reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System makes it less suitable for clinical care or research. Highly reproducible methods to assess pelvic organ prolapse are warranted.

LanguageEnglish
Pages79-82
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Gynecologic Surgery
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Geomini, P. M A J ; Mol, B. W J ; Bremer, G. L. ; Brolmann, H. A M. / Interobserver reproducibility of the halfway grading system : A scoring system for assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. 2000 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 79-82.
@article{4a8d03be68964e36aeb3f576ce26a4fd,
title = "Interobserver reproducibility of the halfway grading system: A scoring system for assessment of pelvic organ prolapse",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System, a scoring system for pelvic organ prolapse. Thirty-six women who underwent abdominal sacroealpopexy were examined by two gynecalogists who were blinded for the medical history and current symptoms of the cooperating women as well as for each other's results. The amount of prolapse of urethra, bladder, cervix, cul de sac, rectum, and perineum was scored on a 5-point scale. The amount of agreement in the judgment of the observers that was expected beyond chance was expressed with a weighted kappa statistic. The overall kappa statistic was 0.59 (95{\%} CI 0.37-0.80). The kappa statistics per anatomic site of greatest prolapse and the site-specific kappa statistics were even lower. The moderate reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System makes it less suitable for clinical care or research. Highly reproducible methods to assess pelvic organ prolapse are warranted.",
author = "Geomini, {P. M A J} and Mol, {B. W J} and Bremer, {G. L.} and Brolmann, {H. A M}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1089/gyn.2000.16.79",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "79--82",
journal = "Journal of Gynecologic Surgery",
issn = "1042-4067",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Interobserver reproducibility of the halfway grading system : A scoring system for assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. / Geomini, P. M A J; Mol, B. W J; Bremer, G. L.; Brolmann, H. A M.

In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2000, p. 79-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver reproducibility of the halfway grading system

T2 - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

AU - Geomini, P. M A J

AU - Mol, B. W J

AU - Bremer, G. L.

AU - Brolmann, H. A M

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System, a scoring system for pelvic organ prolapse. Thirty-six women who underwent abdominal sacroealpopexy were examined by two gynecalogists who were blinded for the medical history and current symptoms of the cooperating women as well as for each other's results. The amount of prolapse of urethra, bladder, cervix, cul de sac, rectum, and perineum was scored on a 5-point scale. The amount of agreement in the judgment of the observers that was expected beyond chance was expressed with a weighted kappa statistic. The overall kappa statistic was 0.59 (95% CI 0.37-0.80). The kappa statistics per anatomic site of greatest prolapse and the site-specific kappa statistics were even lower. The moderate reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System makes it less suitable for clinical care or research. Highly reproducible methods to assess pelvic organ prolapse are warranted.

AB - The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System, a scoring system for pelvic organ prolapse. Thirty-six women who underwent abdominal sacroealpopexy were examined by two gynecalogists who were blinded for the medical history and current symptoms of the cooperating women as well as for each other's results. The amount of prolapse of urethra, bladder, cervix, cul de sac, rectum, and perineum was scored on a 5-point scale. The amount of agreement in the judgment of the observers that was expected beyond chance was expressed with a weighted kappa statistic. The overall kappa statistic was 0.59 (95% CI 0.37-0.80). The kappa statistics per anatomic site of greatest prolapse and the site-specific kappa statistics were even lower. The moderate reproducibility of the Halfway Grading System makes it less suitable for clinical care or research. Highly reproducible methods to assess pelvic organ prolapse are warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033880463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/gyn.2000.16.79

DO - 10.1089/gyn.2000.16.79

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 79

EP - 82

JO - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

JF - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

SN - 1042-4067

IS - 2

ER -