Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation: A review of 197 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study

M. T. Kluger, E. J. Tham, N. A. Coleman, W. B. Runciman, M. F M Bullock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Australian Incident Monitoring Study database was examined for incidents involving inadequate pre-operative patient preparation and/or evaluation. Of 6271 reports, 727 had appropriate keywords, of which 197 (3.1%) were used for subsequent analysis. All surgical categories were represented. In 10% of reports the patient was not reviewed pre-operatively by an anaesthetist, whilst in 23% the anaesthetist involved in the operating theatre had not performed the pre-operative assessment. Death followed in seven cases, major morbidity in 23 cases, admision to a highly-dependency unit or intensive care unit in 17 cases, and surgery was cancelled in nine cases. Poor airway assessment, communication problems and inadequate evaluation were the most common contributing factors. Respondents indicated that the incident was preventable in 57% of cases. Proposed corrective strategies include improved communication, quality assurance activities, development of protocols and additional training. A structured assessment of the airway, along with improvements in information exchange, patient assessment, and use of clearly defined patient management plans and pathways would prevent most of the incidents reported.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1173-1178
Number of pages6
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume55
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anaesthesia: complications
  • Patient assessment: pre-operative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Kluger, M. T. ; Tham, E. J. ; Coleman, N. A. ; Runciman, W. B. ; Bullock, M. F M. / Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation : A review of 197 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study. In: Anaesthesia. 2000 ; Vol. 55, No. 12. pp. 1173-1178.
@article{4b969b7963ea4cd29f73300cd4938c98,
title = "Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation: A review of 197 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study",
abstract = "The Australian Incident Monitoring Study database was examined for incidents involving inadequate pre-operative patient preparation and/or evaluation. Of 6271 reports, 727 had appropriate keywords, of which 197 (3.1{\%}) were used for subsequent analysis. All surgical categories were represented. In 10{\%} of reports the patient was not reviewed pre-operatively by an anaesthetist, whilst in 23{\%} the anaesthetist involved in the operating theatre had not performed the pre-operative assessment. Death followed in seven cases, major morbidity in 23 cases, admision to a highly-dependency unit or intensive care unit in 17 cases, and surgery was cancelled in nine cases. Poor airway assessment, communication problems and inadequate evaluation were the most common contributing factors. Respondents indicated that the incident was preventable in 57{\%} of cases. Proposed corrective strategies include improved communication, quality assurance activities, development of protocols and additional training. A structured assessment of the airway, along with improvements in information exchange, patient assessment, and use of clearly defined patient management plans and pathways would prevent most of the incidents reported.",
keywords = "Anaesthesia: complications, Patient assessment: pre-operative",
author = "Kluger, {M. T.} and Tham, {E. J.} and Coleman, {N. A.} and Runciman, {W. B.} and Bullock, {M. F M}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01725.x",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1173--1178",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation : A review of 197 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study. / Kluger, M. T.; Tham, E. J.; Coleman, N. A.; Runciman, W. B.; Bullock, M. F M.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 55, No. 12, 2000, p. 1173-1178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation

T2 - Anaesthesia

AU - Kluger, M. T.

AU - Tham, E. J.

AU - Coleman, N. A.

AU - Runciman, W. B.

AU - Bullock, M. F M

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The Australian Incident Monitoring Study database was examined for incidents involving inadequate pre-operative patient preparation and/or evaluation. Of 6271 reports, 727 had appropriate keywords, of which 197 (3.1%) were used for subsequent analysis. All surgical categories were represented. In 10% of reports the patient was not reviewed pre-operatively by an anaesthetist, whilst in 23% the anaesthetist involved in the operating theatre had not performed the pre-operative assessment. Death followed in seven cases, major morbidity in 23 cases, admision to a highly-dependency unit or intensive care unit in 17 cases, and surgery was cancelled in nine cases. Poor airway assessment, communication problems and inadequate evaluation were the most common contributing factors. Respondents indicated that the incident was preventable in 57% of cases. Proposed corrective strategies include improved communication, quality assurance activities, development of protocols and additional training. A structured assessment of the airway, along with improvements in information exchange, patient assessment, and use of clearly defined patient management plans and pathways would prevent most of the incidents reported.

AB - The Australian Incident Monitoring Study database was examined for incidents involving inadequate pre-operative patient preparation and/or evaluation. Of 6271 reports, 727 had appropriate keywords, of which 197 (3.1%) were used for subsequent analysis. All surgical categories were represented. In 10% of reports the patient was not reviewed pre-operatively by an anaesthetist, whilst in 23% the anaesthetist involved in the operating theatre had not performed the pre-operative assessment. Death followed in seven cases, major morbidity in 23 cases, admision to a highly-dependency unit or intensive care unit in 17 cases, and surgery was cancelled in nine cases. Poor airway assessment, communication problems and inadequate evaluation were the most common contributing factors. Respondents indicated that the incident was preventable in 57% of cases. Proposed corrective strategies include improved communication, quality assurance activities, development of protocols and additional training. A structured assessment of the airway, along with improvements in information exchange, patient assessment, and use of clearly defined patient management plans and pathways would prevent most of the incidents reported.

KW - Anaesthesia: complications

KW - Patient assessment: pre-operative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033635673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01725.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01725.x

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1173

EP - 1178

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 12

ER -