Implementation of client versus care-provider strategies to improve external cephalic version rates: A cluster randomized controlled trial

Floortje Vlemmix, Ageeth N. Rosman, Marlies E. Rijnders, Antje Beuckens, Brent C. Opmeer, Ben W J Mol, Marjolein Kok, Margot A H Fleuren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To determine the effectiveness of a client or care-provider strategy to improve the implementation of external cephalic version. Design Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting Twenty-five clusters; hospitals and their referring midwifery practices randomly selected in the Netherlands. Population Singleton breech presentation from 32 weeks of gestation onwards. Methods We randomized clusters to a client strategy (written information leaflets and decision aid), a care-provider strategy (1-day counseling course focused on knowledge and counseling skills), a combined client and care-provider strategy and care-as-usual strategy. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. Main outcome measures Rate of external cephalic version in various strategies. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of women counseled and opting for a version attempt. Results The overall implementation rate of external cephalic version was 72% (1169 of 1613 eligible clients) with a range between clusters of 8-95%. Neither the client strategy (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.5) nor the care-provider strategy (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.3) showed significant improvements. Results were comparable when we limited the analysis to those women who were actually offered intervention (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.4 and OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-4.5). Conclusions Neither a client nor a care-provider strategy improved the external cephalic version implementation rate for breech presentation, neither with regard to the number of version attempts offered nor the number of women accepting the procedure.

LanguageEnglish
Pages518-526
Number of pages9
JournalActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume94
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Breech delivery
  • breech presentation
  • external cephalic version
  • implementation
  • mode of delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Vlemmix, Floortje ; Rosman, Ageeth N. ; Rijnders, Marlies E. ; Beuckens, Antje ; Opmeer, Brent C. ; Mol, Ben W J ; Kok, Marjolein ; Fleuren, Margot A H. / Implementation of client versus care-provider strategies to improve external cephalic version rates : A cluster randomized controlled trial. In: Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2015 ; Vol. 94, No. 5. pp. 518-526.
@article{29db57f55f4c4e25be8f744a7b1aece6,
title = "Implementation of client versus care-provider strategies to improve external cephalic version rates: A cluster randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective To determine the effectiveness of a client or care-provider strategy to improve the implementation of external cephalic version. Design Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting Twenty-five clusters; hospitals and their referring midwifery practices randomly selected in the Netherlands. Population Singleton breech presentation from 32 weeks of gestation onwards. Methods We randomized clusters to a client strategy (written information leaflets and decision aid), a care-provider strategy (1-day counseling course focused on knowledge and counseling skills), a combined client and care-provider strategy and care-as-usual strategy. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. Main outcome measures Rate of external cephalic version in various strategies. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of women counseled and opting for a version attempt. Results The overall implementation rate of external cephalic version was 72{\%} (1169 of 1613 eligible clients) with a range between clusters of 8-95{\%}. Neither the client strategy (OR 0.8, 95{\%} CI 0.4-1.5) nor the care-provider strategy (OR 1.2, 95{\%} CI 0.6-2.3) showed significant improvements. Results were comparable when we limited the analysis to those women who were actually offered intervention (OR 0.6, 95{\%} CI 0.3-1.4 and OR 2.0, 95{\%} CI 0.7-4.5). Conclusions Neither a client nor a care-provider strategy improved the external cephalic version implementation rate for breech presentation, neither with regard to the number of version attempts offered nor the number of women accepting the procedure.",
keywords = "Breech delivery, breech presentation, external cephalic version, implementation, mode of delivery",
author = "Floortje Vlemmix and Rosman, {Ageeth N.} and Rijnders, {Marlies E.} and Antje Beuckens and Opmeer, {Brent C.} and Mol, {Ben W J} and Marjolein Kok and Fleuren, {Margot A H}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/aogs.12609",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "518--526",
journal = "Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-6349",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Implementation of client versus care-provider strategies to improve external cephalic version rates : A cluster randomized controlled trial. / Vlemmix, Floortje; Rosman, Ageeth N.; Rijnders, Marlies E.; Beuckens, Antje; Opmeer, Brent C.; Mol, Ben W J; Kok, Marjolein; Fleuren, Margot A H.

In: Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, Vol. 94, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 518-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of client versus care-provider strategies to improve external cephalic version rates

T2 - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

AU - Vlemmix, Floortje

AU - Rosman, Ageeth N.

AU - Rijnders, Marlies E.

AU - Beuckens, Antje

AU - Opmeer, Brent C.

AU - Mol, Ben W J

AU - Kok, Marjolein

AU - Fleuren, Margot A H

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objective To determine the effectiveness of a client or care-provider strategy to improve the implementation of external cephalic version. Design Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting Twenty-five clusters; hospitals and their referring midwifery practices randomly selected in the Netherlands. Population Singleton breech presentation from 32 weeks of gestation onwards. Methods We randomized clusters to a client strategy (written information leaflets and decision aid), a care-provider strategy (1-day counseling course focused on knowledge and counseling skills), a combined client and care-provider strategy and care-as-usual strategy. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. Main outcome measures Rate of external cephalic version in various strategies. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of women counseled and opting for a version attempt. Results The overall implementation rate of external cephalic version was 72% (1169 of 1613 eligible clients) with a range between clusters of 8-95%. Neither the client strategy (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.5) nor the care-provider strategy (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.3) showed significant improvements. Results were comparable when we limited the analysis to those women who were actually offered intervention (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.4 and OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-4.5). Conclusions Neither a client nor a care-provider strategy improved the external cephalic version implementation rate for breech presentation, neither with regard to the number of version attempts offered nor the number of women accepting the procedure.

AB - Objective To determine the effectiveness of a client or care-provider strategy to improve the implementation of external cephalic version. Design Cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting Twenty-five clusters; hospitals and their referring midwifery practices randomly selected in the Netherlands. Population Singleton breech presentation from 32 weeks of gestation onwards. Methods We randomized clusters to a client strategy (written information leaflets and decision aid), a care-provider strategy (1-day counseling course focused on knowledge and counseling skills), a combined client and care-provider strategy and care-as-usual strategy. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. Main outcome measures Rate of external cephalic version in various strategies. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of women counseled and opting for a version attempt. Results The overall implementation rate of external cephalic version was 72% (1169 of 1613 eligible clients) with a range between clusters of 8-95%. Neither the client strategy (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.5) nor the care-provider strategy (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.3) showed significant improvements. Results were comparable when we limited the analysis to those women who were actually offered intervention (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.4 and OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-4.5). Conclusions Neither a client nor a care-provider strategy improved the external cephalic version implementation rate for breech presentation, neither with regard to the number of version attempts offered nor the number of women accepting the procedure.

KW - Breech delivery

KW - breech presentation

KW - external cephalic version

KW - implementation

KW - mode of delivery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927523494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/aogs.12609

DO - 10.1111/aogs.12609

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 518

EP - 526

JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-6349

IS - 5

ER -