Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women

Rebecca Thomson, Grant D. Brinkworth, Jonathan D. Buckley, Manny Noakes, Peter M. Clifton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To compare estimations of body composition using two different methods of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for estimating body composition during weight loss in overweight and obese young females. Methods: Twenty-four overweight or obese females (age 29.5±6.1 years, BMI 36.4±4.3 kg/m2) had body composition assessed using single-frequency (Tanita Ultimate Scale™; SF-BIA) and multi-frequency (Impedimed SFB7™; MF-BIA) BIA and DXA before and after a 10-week weight loss intervention. Results: MF-BIA estimates of body composition showed good absolute agreement with DXA, as evidenced by the small biases in the estimation of fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and percentage body fat (BF%); however, the limits of agreement for each variable were wide (bias ±1.96 standard deviation; FFM -1.6±6.5 kg, FM 1.6±6.5 kg, BF% 1.4±6.3%). SF-BIA exhibited a larger bias with wide limits of agreement (FFM 3.8±9.1 kg, FM -3.8±9.1 kg, BF% -4.37±10.3%). During weight loss the values provided by MF-BIA and SF-BIA were not significantly different from DXA (p≥0.89) due to small bias and the limits of agreement were narrow (MF-BIA: FFM -0.01±3.74 kg, FM 0.01±3.74 kg, BF% 0.22±3.40%; SF-BIA: FFM 0.40±3.92 kg, FM -0.40±3.92 kg, BF% 0.25±3.40%). Conclusion: Compared with DXA, both the MF-BIA and SF-BIA accurately assessed changes in body composition with weight loss but, compared with SF-BIA, MF-BIA provided superior cross-sectional estimates of body composition.

LanguageEnglish
Pages771-777
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Nutrition
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bioelectrical impedance analysis
  • Body composition
  • Body fat
  • Dual X-ray absorptiometry
  • Weight loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Thomson, Rebecca ; Brinkworth, Grant D. ; Buckley, Jonathan D. ; Noakes, Manny ; Clifton, Peter M. / Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women. In: Clinical Nutrition. 2007 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 771-777.
@article{bff817f9cc7147ddaa3859f546e6b8bc,
title = "Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women",
abstract = "Aims: To compare estimations of body composition using two different methods of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for estimating body composition during weight loss in overweight and obese young females. Methods: Twenty-four overweight or obese females (age 29.5±6.1 years, BMI 36.4±4.3 kg/m2) had body composition assessed using single-frequency (Tanita Ultimate Scale™; SF-BIA) and multi-frequency (Impedimed SFB7™; MF-BIA) BIA and DXA before and after a 10-week weight loss intervention. Results: MF-BIA estimates of body composition showed good absolute agreement with DXA, as evidenced by the small biases in the estimation of fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and percentage body fat (BF{\%}); however, the limits of agreement for each variable were wide (bias ±1.96 standard deviation; FFM -1.6±6.5 kg, FM 1.6±6.5 kg, BF{\%} 1.4±6.3{\%}). SF-BIA exhibited a larger bias with wide limits of agreement (FFM 3.8±9.1 kg, FM -3.8±9.1 kg, BF{\%} -4.37±10.3{\%}). During weight loss the values provided by MF-BIA and SF-BIA were not significantly different from DXA (p≥0.89) due to small bias and the limits of agreement were narrow (MF-BIA: FFM -0.01±3.74 kg, FM 0.01±3.74 kg, BF{\%} 0.22±3.40{\%}; SF-BIA: FFM 0.40±3.92 kg, FM -0.40±3.92 kg, BF{\%} 0.25±3.40{\%}). Conclusion: Compared with DXA, both the MF-BIA and SF-BIA accurately assessed changes in body composition with weight loss but, compared with SF-BIA, MF-BIA provided superior cross-sectional estimates of body composition.",
keywords = "Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Body composition, Body fat, Dual X-ray absorptiometry, Weight loss",
author = "Rebecca Thomson and Brinkworth, {Grant D.} and Buckley, {Jonathan D.} and Manny Noakes and Clifton, {Peter M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "771--777",
journal = "Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0261-5614",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6",

}

Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women. / Thomson, Rebecca; Brinkworth, Grant D.; Buckley, Jonathan D.; Noakes, Manny; Clifton, Peter M.

In: Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.12.2007, p. 771-777.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women

AU - Thomson, Rebecca

AU - Brinkworth, Grant D.

AU - Buckley, Jonathan D.

AU - Noakes, Manny

AU - Clifton, Peter M.

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Aims: To compare estimations of body composition using two different methods of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for estimating body composition during weight loss in overweight and obese young females. Methods: Twenty-four overweight or obese females (age 29.5±6.1 years, BMI 36.4±4.3 kg/m2) had body composition assessed using single-frequency (Tanita Ultimate Scale™; SF-BIA) and multi-frequency (Impedimed SFB7™; MF-BIA) BIA and DXA before and after a 10-week weight loss intervention. Results: MF-BIA estimates of body composition showed good absolute agreement with DXA, as evidenced by the small biases in the estimation of fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and percentage body fat (BF%); however, the limits of agreement for each variable were wide (bias ±1.96 standard deviation; FFM -1.6±6.5 kg, FM 1.6±6.5 kg, BF% 1.4±6.3%). SF-BIA exhibited a larger bias with wide limits of agreement (FFM 3.8±9.1 kg, FM -3.8±9.1 kg, BF% -4.37±10.3%). During weight loss the values provided by MF-BIA and SF-BIA were not significantly different from DXA (p≥0.89) due to small bias and the limits of agreement were narrow (MF-BIA: FFM -0.01±3.74 kg, FM 0.01±3.74 kg, BF% 0.22±3.40%; SF-BIA: FFM 0.40±3.92 kg, FM -0.40±3.92 kg, BF% 0.25±3.40%). Conclusion: Compared with DXA, both the MF-BIA and SF-BIA accurately assessed changes in body composition with weight loss but, compared with SF-BIA, MF-BIA provided superior cross-sectional estimates of body composition.

AB - Aims: To compare estimations of body composition using two different methods of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for estimating body composition during weight loss in overweight and obese young females. Methods: Twenty-four overweight or obese females (age 29.5±6.1 years, BMI 36.4±4.3 kg/m2) had body composition assessed using single-frequency (Tanita Ultimate Scale™; SF-BIA) and multi-frequency (Impedimed SFB7™; MF-BIA) BIA and DXA before and after a 10-week weight loss intervention. Results: MF-BIA estimates of body composition showed good absolute agreement with DXA, as evidenced by the small biases in the estimation of fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and percentage body fat (BF%); however, the limits of agreement for each variable were wide (bias ±1.96 standard deviation; FFM -1.6±6.5 kg, FM 1.6±6.5 kg, BF% 1.4±6.3%). SF-BIA exhibited a larger bias with wide limits of agreement (FFM 3.8±9.1 kg, FM -3.8±9.1 kg, BF% -4.37±10.3%). During weight loss the values provided by MF-BIA and SF-BIA were not significantly different from DXA (p≥0.89) due to small bias and the limits of agreement were narrow (MF-BIA: FFM -0.01±3.74 kg, FM 0.01±3.74 kg, BF% 0.22±3.40%; SF-BIA: FFM 0.40±3.92 kg, FM -0.40±3.92 kg, BF% 0.25±3.40%). Conclusion: Compared with DXA, both the MF-BIA and SF-BIA accurately assessed changes in body composition with weight loss but, compared with SF-BIA, MF-BIA provided superior cross-sectional estimates of body composition.

KW - Bioelectrical impedance analysis

KW - Body composition

KW - Body fat

KW - Dual X-ray absorptiometry

KW - Weight loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36049005594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 771

EP - 777

JO - Clinical Nutrition

T2 - Clinical Nutrition

JF - Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0261-5614

IS - 6

ER -