FORM: An Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines

Susan Hillier, Karen Grimmer-Somers, Tracy Merlin, Philippa Middleton, Janet Salisbury, Rebecca Tooher, Adele Weston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines are an important element of evidence-based practice. Considering an often complicated body of evidence can be problematic for guideline developers, who in the past may have resorted to using levels of evidence of individual studies as a quasi-indicator for the strength of a recommendation. This paper reports on the production and trial of a methodology and associated processes to assist Australian guideline developers in considering a body of evidence and grading the resulting guideline recommendations. Methods. In recognition of the complexities of clinical guidelines and the multiple factors that influence choice in health care, a working group of experienced guideline consultants was formed under the auspices of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) to produce and pilot a framework to formulate and grade guideline recommendations. Consultation with national and international experts and extensive piloting informed the process. Results: The FORM framework consists of five components (evidence base, consistency, clinical impact, generalisability and applicability) which are used by guideline developers to structure their decisions on how to convey the strength of a recommendation through wording and grading via a considered judgement form. In parallel (but separate from the grading process) guideline developers are asked to consider implementation implications for each recommendation. Conclusions: The framework has now been widely adopted by Australian guideline developers who find it to be a logical and intuitive way to formulate and grade recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.

LanguageEnglish
Article number23
JournalBMC medical research methodology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Hillier, Susan ; Grimmer-Somers, Karen ; Merlin, Tracy ; Middleton, Philippa ; Salisbury, Janet ; Tooher, Rebecca ; Weston, Adele. / FORM : An Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. In: BMC medical research methodology. 2011 ; Vol. 11.
@article{6d811e1a6f404ca1b7c1886faf963773,
title = "FORM: An Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines",
abstract = "Background: Clinical practice guidelines are an important element of evidence-based practice. Considering an often complicated body of evidence can be problematic for guideline developers, who in the past may have resorted to using levels of evidence of individual studies as a quasi-indicator for the strength of a recommendation. This paper reports on the production and trial of a methodology and associated processes to assist Australian guideline developers in considering a body of evidence and grading the resulting guideline recommendations. Methods. In recognition of the complexities of clinical guidelines and the multiple factors that influence choice in health care, a working group of experienced guideline consultants was formed under the auspices of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) to produce and pilot a framework to formulate and grade guideline recommendations. Consultation with national and international experts and extensive piloting informed the process. Results: The FORM framework consists of five components (evidence base, consistency, clinical impact, generalisability and applicability) which are used by guideline developers to structure their decisions on how to convey the strength of a recommendation through wording and grading via a considered judgement form. In parallel (but separate from the grading process) guideline developers are asked to consider implementation implications for each recommendation. Conclusions: The framework has now been widely adopted by Australian guideline developers who find it to be a logical and intuitive way to formulate and grade recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.",
author = "Susan Hillier and Karen Grimmer-Somers and Tracy Merlin and Philippa Middleton and Janet Salisbury and Rebecca Tooher and Adele Weston",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2288-11-23",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

FORM : An Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. / Hillier, Susan; Grimmer-Somers, Karen; Merlin, Tracy; Middleton, Philippa; Salisbury, Janet; Tooher, Rebecca; Weston, Adele.

In: BMC medical research methodology, Vol. 11, 23, 02.03.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - FORM

T2 - BMC Medical Research Methodology

AU - Hillier, Susan

AU - Grimmer-Somers, Karen

AU - Merlin, Tracy

AU - Middleton, Philippa

AU - Salisbury, Janet

AU - Tooher, Rebecca

AU - Weston, Adele

PY - 2011/3/2

Y1 - 2011/3/2

N2 - Background: Clinical practice guidelines are an important element of evidence-based practice. Considering an often complicated body of evidence can be problematic for guideline developers, who in the past may have resorted to using levels of evidence of individual studies as a quasi-indicator for the strength of a recommendation. This paper reports on the production and trial of a methodology and associated processes to assist Australian guideline developers in considering a body of evidence and grading the resulting guideline recommendations. Methods. In recognition of the complexities of clinical guidelines and the multiple factors that influence choice in health care, a working group of experienced guideline consultants was formed under the auspices of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) to produce and pilot a framework to formulate and grade guideline recommendations. Consultation with national and international experts and extensive piloting informed the process. Results: The FORM framework consists of five components (evidence base, consistency, clinical impact, generalisability and applicability) which are used by guideline developers to structure their decisions on how to convey the strength of a recommendation through wording and grading via a considered judgement form. In parallel (but separate from the grading process) guideline developers are asked to consider implementation implications for each recommendation. Conclusions: The framework has now been widely adopted by Australian guideline developers who find it to be a logical and intuitive way to formulate and grade recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.

AB - Background: Clinical practice guidelines are an important element of evidence-based practice. Considering an often complicated body of evidence can be problematic for guideline developers, who in the past may have resorted to using levels of evidence of individual studies as a quasi-indicator for the strength of a recommendation. This paper reports on the production and trial of a methodology and associated processes to assist Australian guideline developers in considering a body of evidence and grading the resulting guideline recommendations. Methods. In recognition of the complexities of clinical guidelines and the multiple factors that influence choice in health care, a working group of experienced guideline consultants was formed under the auspices of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) to produce and pilot a framework to formulate and grade guideline recommendations. Consultation with national and international experts and extensive piloting informed the process. Results: The FORM framework consists of five components (evidence base, consistency, clinical impact, generalisability and applicability) which are used by guideline developers to structure their decisions on how to convey the strength of a recommendation through wording and grading via a considered judgement form. In parallel (but separate from the grading process) guideline developers are asked to consider implementation implications for each recommendation. Conclusions: The framework has now been widely adopted by Australian guideline developers who find it to be a logical and intuitive way to formulate and grade recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952045714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-11-23

DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-11-23

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

M1 - 23

ER -