Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: A report of two cases and review of the literature

Freke A. Wilmink, Femke F. Wilms, Roger Heydanus, Ben W J Mol, Dimitri N M Papatsonis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Uterine contractions during labor can be monitored by external tocodynamometry or by the use of an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC). Since an IUPC measures the frequency of contractions as well as their strength and duration, it is thought to be more accurate than external tocodynamometry. However, limited evidence on this subject suggests that IUPC may not improve maternal or perinatal outcomes. Moreover, the use of IUPC may cause fetal complications. Cases. We describe the placement of an IUPC during induction of labor with oxytocin in two cases, one presenting with a singleton pregnancy and the other a twin pregnancy. After introduction of the IUPC, both cases were complicated by blood loss and signs of fetal distress on cardiotocography. An emergency cesarean section was performed in both cases. In the first case, extramembranous placement of the IUPC was observed, whereas in the second case, the IUPC had lacerated an arteriovenous anastomosis in the membranes, resulting in perinatal death. Conclusion. Placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter instead of external tocodynamometry has a small risk for serious fetal complications.

LanguageEnglish
Pages880-883
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume21
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cardiotocography
  • Extramembranous
  • Extraovular placement
  • Intrauterine pressure
  • Intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC)
  • Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Wilmink, Freke A. ; Wilms, Femke F. ; Heydanus, Roger ; Mol, Ben W J ; Papatsonis, Dimitri N M. / Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter : A report of two cases and review of the literature. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 21, No. 12. pp. 880-883.
@article{d0cfbc3ce5de4ee6aff830366133b074,
title = "Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: A report of two cases and review of the literature",
abstract = "Background. Uterine contractions during labor can be monitored by external tocodynamometry or by the use of an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC). Since an IUPC measures the frequency of contractions as well as their strength and duration, it is thought to be more accurate than external tocodynamometry. However, limited evidence on this subject suggests that IUPC may not improve maternal or perinatal outcomes. Moreover, the use of IUPC may cause fetal complications. Cases. We describe the placement of an IUPC during induction of labor with oxytocin in two cases, one presenting with a singleton pregnancy and the other a twin pregnancy. After introduction of the IUPC, both cases were complicated by blood loss and signs of fetal distress on cardiotocography. An emergency cesarean section was performed in both cases. In the first case, extramembranous placement of the IUPC was observed, whereas in the second case, the IUPC had lacerated an arteriovenous anastomosis in the membranes, resulting in perinatal death. Conclusion. Placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter instead of external tocodynamometry has a small risk for serious fetal complications.",
keywords = "Cardiotocography, Extramembranous, Extraovular placement, Intrauterine pressure, Intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC), Pregnancy",
author = "Wilmink, {Freke A.} and Wilms, {Femke F.} and Roger Heydanus and Mol, {Ben W J} and Papatsonis, {Dimitri N M}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/14767050802220508",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "880--883",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "12",

}

Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter : A report of two cases and review of the literature. / Wilmink, Freke A.; Wilms, Femke F.; Heydanus, Roger; Mol, Ben W J; Papatsonis, Dimitri N M.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 12, 16.12.2008, p. 880-883.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter

T2 - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

AU - Wilmink, Freke A.

AU - Wilms, Femke F.

AU - Heydanus, Roger

AU - Mol, Ben W J

AU - Papatsonis, Dimitri N M

PY - 2008/12/16

Y1 - 2008/12/16

N2 - Background. Uterine contractions during labor can be monitored by external tocodynamometry or by the use of an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC). Since an IUPC measures the frequency of contractions as well as their strength and duration, it is thought to be more accurate than external tocodynamometry. However, limited evidence on this subject suggests that IUPC may not improve maternal or perinatal outcomes. Moreover, the use of IUPC may cause fetal complications. Cases. We describe the placement of an IUPC during induction of labor with oxytocin in two cases, one presenting with a singleton pregnancy and the other a twin pregnancy. After introduction of the IUPC, both cases were complicated by blood loss and signs of fetal distress on cardiotocography. An emergency cesarean section was performed in both cases. In the first case, extramembranous placement of the IUPC was observed, whereas in the second case, the IUPC had lacerated an arteriovenous anastomosis in the membranes, resulting in perinatal death. Conclusion. Placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter instead of external tocodynamometry has a small risk for serious fetal complications.

AB - Background. Uterine contractions during labor can be monitored by external tocodynamometry or by the use of an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC). Since an IUPC measures the frequency of contractions as well as their strength and duration, it is thought to be more accurate than external tocodynamometry. However, limited evidence on this subject suggests that IUPC may not improve maternal or perinatal outcomes. Moreover, the use of IUPC may cause fetal complications. Cases. We describe the placement of an IUPC during induction of labor with oxytocin in two cases, one presenting with a singleton pregnancy and the other a twin pregnancy. After introduction of the IUPC, both cases were complicated by blood loss and signs of fetal distress on cardiotocography. An emergency cesarean section was performed in both cases. In the first case, extramembranous placement of the IUPC was observed, whereas in the second case, the IUPC had lacerated an arteriovenous anastomosis in the membranes, resulting in perinatal death. Conclusion. Placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter instead of external tocodynamometry has a small risk for serious fetal complications.

KW - Cardiotocography

KW - Extramembranous

KW - Extraovular placement

KW - Intrauterine pressure

KW - Intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC)

KW - Pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57449106873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14767050802220508

DO - 10.1080/14767050802220508

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 880

EP - 883

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 12

ER -