External validation of a clinical scoring system for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus

M. van Leeuwen, B. C. Opmeer, E. J K Zweers, E. van Ballegooie, H. G. ter Brugge, H. W. de Valk, G. H A Visser, B. W J Mol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: A prediction rule for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) could be helpful in early detection and increased efficiency of screening. A prediction rule by means of a clinical scoring system is available, but has never been validated externally. The aim of this study was to validate the scoring system. Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort study. Women were assigned a score based on age, BMI and ethnicity. Performance of the scoring system was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration (agreement between clinical score and observed probability of GDM). We compared the efficiency of a screening strategy derived from the scoring system with conventional screening. Results: We studied 1266 women. Forty-seven women had GDM (3.7%). The scoring system discriminated moderately (area under the curve = 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.72)). Calibration was limited (χ2 = 8.89, p = 0.06). The screening strategy derived from the scoring system reduced the number of women needed to be screened with 25% for a comparable detection rate to universal screening. Conclusion: Despite moderate discriminative capacity and calibration of the scoring system, the screening strategy based on the scoring system appears clinically useful. There is need for better prediction models for GDM.

LanguageEnglish
Pages96-101
Number of pages6
JournalDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2009

Keywords

  • External validation
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Prediction model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

van Leeuwen, M., Opmeer, B. C., Zweers, E. J. K., van Ballegooie, E., ter Brugge, H. G., de Valk, H. W., ... Mol, B. W. J. (2009). External validation of a clinical scoring system for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 85(1), 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2009.04.025
van Leeuwen, M. ; Opmeer, B. C. ; Zweers, E. J K ; van Ballegooie, E. ; ter Brugge, H. G. ; de Valk, H. W. ; Visser, G. H A ; Mol, B. W J. / External validation of a clinical scoring system for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. In: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2009 ; Vol. 85, No. 1. pp. 96-101.
@article{d7ea60c6108943738e2945f726bd9e5d,
title = "External validation of a clinical scoring system for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus",
abstract = "Aim: A prediction rule for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) could be helpful in early detection and increased efficiency of screening. A prediction rule by means of a clinical scoring system is available, but has never been validated externally. The aim of this study was to validate the scoring system. Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort study. Women were assigned a score based on age, BMI and ethnicity. Performance of the scoring system was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration (agreement between clinical score and observed probability of GDM). We compared the efficiency of a screening strategy derived from the scoring system with conventional screening. Results: We studied 1266 women. Forty-seven women had GDM (3.7{\%}). The scoring system discriminated moderately (area under the curve = 0.64 (95{\%} CI 0.56-0.72)). Calibration was limited (χ2 = 8.89, p = 0.06). The screening strategy derived from the scoring system reduced the number of women needed to be screened with 25{\%} for a comparable detection rate to universal screening. Conclusion: Despite moderate discriminative capacity and calibration of the scoring system, the screening strategy based on the scoring system appears clinically useful. There is need for better prediction models for GDM.",
keywords = "External validation, Gestational diabetes mellitus, Prediction model",
author = "{van Leeuwen}, M. and Opmeer, {B. C.} and Zweers, {E. J K} and {van Ballegooie}, E. and {ter Brugge}, {H. G.} and {de Valk}, {H. W.} and Visser, {G. H A} and Mol, {B. W J}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.diabres.2009.04.025",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "96--101",
journal = "Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice",
issn = "0168-8227",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

van Leeuwen, M, Opmeer, BC, Zweers, EJK, van Ballegooie, E, ter Brugge, HG, de Valk, HW, Visser, GHA & Mol, BWJ 2009, 'External validation of a clinical scoring system for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus', Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2009.04.025

External validation of a clinical scoring system for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. / van Leeuwen, M.; Opmeer, B. C.; Zweers, E. J K; van Ballegooie, E.; ter Brugge, H. G.; de Valk, H. W.; Visser, G. H A; Mol, B. W J.

In: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, Vol. 85, No. 1, 01.07.2009, p. 96-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - External validation of a clinical scoring system for the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus

AU - van Leeuwen, M.

AU - Opmeer, B. C.

AU - Zweers, E. J K

AU - van Ballegooie, E.

AU - ter Brugge, H. G.

AU - de Valk, H. W.

AU - Visser, G. H A

AU - Mol, B. W J

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Aim: A prediction rule for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) could be helpful in early detection and increased efficiency of screening. A prediction rule by means of a clinical scoring system is available, but has never been validated externally. The aim of this study was to validate the scoring system. Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort study. Women were assigned a score based on age, BMI and ethnicity. Performance of the scoring system was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration (agreement between clinical score and observed probability of GDM). We compared the efficiency of a screening strategy derived from the scoring system with conventional screening. Results: We studied 1266 women. Forty-seven women had GDM (3.7%). The scoring system discriminated moderately (area under the curve = 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.72)). Calibration was limited (χ2 = 8.89, p = 0.06). The screening strategy derived from the scoring system reduced the number of women needed to be screened with 25% for a comparable detection rate to universal screening. Conclusion: Despite moderate discriminative capacity and calibration of the scoring system, the screening strategy based on the scoring system appears clinically useful. There is need for better prediction models for GDM.

AB - Aim: A prediction rule for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) could be helpful in early detection and increased efficiency of screening. A prediction rule by means of a clinical scoring system is available, but has never been validated externally. The aim of this study was to validate the scoring system. Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort study. Women were assigned a score based on age, BMI and ethnicity. Performance of the scoring system was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration (agreement between clinical score and observed probability of GDM). We compared the efficiency of a screening strategy derived from the scoring system with conventional screening. Results: We studied 1266 women. Forty-seven women had GDM (3.7%). The scoring system discriminated moderately (area under the curve = 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.72)). Calibration was limited (χ2 = 8.89, p = 0.06). The screening strategy derived from the scoring system reduced the number of women needed to be screened with 25% for a comparable detection rate to universal screening. Conclusion: Despite moderate discriminative capacity and calibration of the scoring system, the screening strategy based on the scoring system appears clinically useful. There is need for better prediction models for GDM.

KW - External validation

KW - Gestational diabetes mellitus

KW - Prediction model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349129733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.04.025

DO - 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.04.025

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 96

EP - 101

JO - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

T2 - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

JF - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

SN - 0168-8227

IS - 1

ER -