External cephalic version-related risks: A meta-analysis

Marjolein Kok, Kim Grootscholten, S. Guid Oei, B. W J Mol, Joris A. Van Der Post

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. DATA SOURCES: In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1% (95% CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24% for serious complications (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35% for emergency cesarean deliveries (95% CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.93-1.7). CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1143-1151
Number of pages9
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume112
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Kok, M., Grootscholten, K., Oei, S. G., Mol, B. W. J., & Van Der Post, J. A. (2008). External cephalic version-related risks: A meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 112(5), 1143-1151. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade
Kok, Marjolein ; Grootscholten, Kim ; Oei, S. Guid ; Mol, B. W J ; Van Der Post, Joris A. / External cephalic version-related risks : A meta-analysis. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008 ; Vol. 112, No. 5. pp. 1143-1151.
@article{901288af69b94b33bf86d55086452f38,
title = "External cephalic version-related risks: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. DATA SOURCES: In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1{\%} (95{\%} CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24{\%} for serious complications (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35{\%} for emergency cesarean deliveries (95{\%} CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95{\%} CI 0.93-1.7). CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.",
author = "Marjolein Kok and Kim Grootscholten and Oei, {S. Guid} and Mol, {B. W J} and {Van Der Post}, {Joris A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "1143--1151",
journal = "Obstetrics and gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

Kok, M, Grootscholten, K, Oei, SG, Mol, BWJ & Van Der Post, JA 2008, 'External cephalic version-related risks: A meta-analysis', Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 1143-1151. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade

External cephalic version-related risks : A meta-analysis. / Kok, Marjolein; Grootscholten, Kim; Oei, S. Guid; Mol, B. W J; Van Der Post, Joris A.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 112, No. 5, 01.11.2008, p. 1143-1151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - External cephalic version-related risks

T2 - Obstetrics and gynecology

AU - Kok, Marjolein

AU - Grootscholten, Kim

AU - Oei, S. Guid

AU - Mol, B. W J

AU - Van Der Post, Joris A.

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. DATA SOURCES: In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1% (95% CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24% for serious complications (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35% for emergency cesarean deliveries (95% CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.93-1.7). CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. DATA SOURCES: In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1% (95% CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24% for serious complications (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35% for emergency cesarean deliveries (95% CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.93-1.7). CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149279815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 1143

EP - 1151

JO - Obstetrics and gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 5

ER -

Kok M, Grootscholten K, Oei SG, Mol BWJ, Van Der Post JA. External cephalic version-related risks: A meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008 Nov 1;112(5):1143-1151. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade