Effect of feedback regarding urinary cotinine and brief tailored advice on home smoking restrictions among low-income parents of children with asthma: A controlled trial

Melanie Wakefield, David Banham, Kieran McCaul, James Martin, Richard Ruffin, Neil Badcock, Lyn Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Since most smoker parents of children with asthma are unable to quit, an alternative measure that would reduce their children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is to ban smoking in the home. Methods. Compared with 136 usual-care controls, 128 intervention-group parents recruited from South Australian pediatric hospital outpatient waiting rooms were given written and verbal feedback about their 1- to 11-year-old child's urinary cotinine-to-creatinine level, information booklets, and two telephone calls encouraging a ban on smoking at home. Results. At 6 months, 49.2% of the intervention group reported having banned smoking in the home compared with 41.9% of controls, but the differential rate of change from baseline was not significant (P = 0.40). At follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups in the percentage reporting bans on smoking in the car, the mean reduction from baseline in total daily consumption or consumption in front of the child, children's urinary cotinine level, or parental smoking cessation. Conclusions. The intervention did not change parents' propensity to create or maintain bans on smoking in their homes or otherwise change smoking habits to reduce their children's exposure to ETS. More intensive interventions may be required to achieve change among low-income smoker parents of children with asthma.

LanguageEnglish
Pages58-65
Number of pages8
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2002

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Children
  • Smoking, prevention and control
  • Tobacco smoke pollution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Wakefield, Melanie ; Banham, David ; McCaul, Kieran ; Martin, James ; Ruffin, Richard ; Badcock, Neil ; Roberts, Lyn. / Effect of feedback regarding urinary cotinine and brief tailored advice on home smoking restrictions among low-income parents of children with asthma : A controlled trial. In: Preventive Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 58-65.
@article{43529d4ba0fd4d7b934b955396df78ae,
title = "Effect of feedback regarding urinary cotinine and brief tailored advice on home smoking restrictions among low-income parents of children with asthma: A controlled trial",
abstract = "Background. Since most smoker parents of children with asthma are unable to quit, an alternative measure that would reduce their children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is to ban smoking in the home. Methods. Compared with 136 usual-care controls, 128 intervention-group parents recruited from South Australian pediatric hospital outpatient waiting rooms were given written and verbal feedback about their 1- to 11-year-old child's urinary cotinine-to-creatinine level, information booklets, and two telephone calls encouraging a ban on smoking at home. Results. At 6 months, 49.2{\%} of the intervention group reported having banned smoking in the home compared with 41.9{\%} of controls, but the differential rate of change from baseline was not significant (P = 0.40). At follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups in the percentage reporting bans on smoking in the car, the mean reduction from baseline in total daily consumption or consumption in front of the child, children's urinary cotinine level, or parental smoking cessation. Conclusions. The intervention did not change parents' propensity to create or maintain bans on smoking in their homes or otherwise change smoking habits to reduce their children's exposure to ETS. More intensive interventions may be required to achieve change among low-income smoker parents of children with asthma.",
keywords = "Asthma, Children, Smoking, prevention and control, Tobacco smoke pollution",
author = "Melanie Wakefield and David Banham and Kieran McCaul and James Martin and Richard Ruffin and Neil Badcock and Lyn Roberts",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/pmed.2001.0953",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "58--65",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Effect of feedback regarding urinary cotinine and brief tailored advice on home smoking restrictions among low-income parents of children with asthma : A controlled trial. / Wakefield, Melanie; Banham, David; McCaul, Kieran; Martin, James; Ruffin, Richard; Badcock, Neil; Roberts, Lyn.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2002, p. 58-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of feedback regarding urinary cotinine and brief tailored advice on home smoking restrictions among low-income parents of children with asthma

T2 - Preventive Medicine

AU - Wakefield, Melanie

AU - Banham, David

AU - McCaul, Kieran

AU - Martin, James

AU - Ruffin, Richard

AU - Badcock, Neil

AU - Roberts, Lyn

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Background. Since most smoker parents of children with asthma are unable to quit, an alternative measure that would reduce their children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is to ban smoking in the home. Methods. Compared with 136 usual-care controls, 128 intervention-group parents recruited from South Australian pediatric hospital outpatient waiting rooms were given written and verbal feedback about their 1- to 11-year-old child's urinary cotinine-to-creatinine level, information booklets, and two telephone calls encouraging a ban on smoking at home. Results. At 6 months, 49.2% of the intervention group reported having banned smoking in the home compared with 41.9% of controls, but the differential rate of change from baseline was not significant (P = 0.40). At follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups in the percentage reporting bans on smoking in the car, the mean reduction from baseline in total daily consumption or consumption in front of the child, children's urinary cotinine level, or parental smoking cessation. Conclusions. The intervention did not change parents' propensity to create or maintain bans on smoking in their homes or otherwise change smoking habits to reduce their children's exposure to ETS. More intensive interventions may be required to achieve change among low-income smoker parents of children with asthma.

AB - Background. Since most smoker parents of children with asthma are unable to quit, an alternative measure that would reduce their children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is to ban smoking in the home. Methods. Compared with 136 usual-care controls, 128 intervention-group parents recruited from South Australian pediatric hospital outpatient waiting rooms were given written and verbal feedback about their 1- to 11-year-old child's urinary cotinine-to-creatinine level, information booklets, and two telephone calls encouraging a ban on smoking at home. Results. At 6 months, 49.2% of the intervention group reported having banned smoking in the home compared with 41.9% of controls, but the differential rate of change from baseline was not significant (P = 0.40). At follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups in the percentage reporting bans on smoking in the car, the mean reduction from baseline in total daily consumption or consumption in front of the child, children's urinary cotinine level, or parental smoking cessation. Conclusions. The intervention did not change parents' propensity to create or maintain bans on smoking in their homes or otherwise change smoking habits to reduce their children's exposure to ETS. More intensive interventions may be required to achieve change among low-income smoker parents of children with asthma.

KW - Asthma

KW - Children

KW - Smoking, prevention and control

KW - Tobacco smoke pollution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036354574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/pmed.2001.0953

DO - 10.1006/pmed.2001.0953

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 58

EP - 65

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 1

ER -