Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review and metaanalysis

Maartje N. Niemeijer, Iris J. Grooten, Nikki Vos, Joke M J Bais, Joris A. Van Der Post, Ben W. Mol, Tessa J. Roseboom, Mariska M G Leeflang, Rebecca C. Painter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG; protracted vomiting in pregnancy) and no single widely used set of diagnostic criteria for HG. The various definitions rely on symptoms, sometimes in combination with laboratory tests. Through a systematic review, we aimed to summarize available evidence on the diagnostic value of biomarkers for HG. This could assist diagnosis and may shed light on the, as yet, not understood cause of the disorder. Study Design We searched Medline and Embase for articles about diagnostic biomarkers for either the presence or severity of HG or nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. We defined HG as any combination of nausea, vomiting, dehydration, weight loss, or hospitalization for nausea and/or vomiting in pregnancy, in the absence of any other obvious cause for these complaints. Results We found 81 articles on 9 biomarkers. Although 65% of all studies included only HG cases with ketonuria, we did not find an association between ketonuria and presence or severity of HG in 5 studies reporting on this association. Metaanalysis, with the use of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model, yielded an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.0-5.1) of Heliobacter pylori for HG, as compared with asymptomatic control subjects (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 55%). Studies on human chorionic gonadotropin and thyroid hormones, leptin, estradiol, progesterone, and white blood count showed inconsistent associations with HG; lymphocytes tended to be higher in women with HG. Conclusion We did not find support for the use of ketonuria in the diagnosis of HG. H pylori serology might be useful in specific patients.

LanguageEnglish
Pages150.e1-150.e15
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume211
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • biomarker
  • diagnosis
  • hyperemesis gravidarum
  • nausea and vomiting
  • pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Niemeijer, M. N., Grooten, I. J., Vos, N., Bais, J. M. J., Van Der Post, J. A., Mol, B. W., ... Painter, R. C. (2014). Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review and metaanalysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 211(2), 150.e1-150.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.012
Niemeijer, Maartje N. ; Grooten, Iris J. ; Vos, Nikki ; Bais, Joke M J ; Van Der Post, Joris A. ; Mol, Ben W. ; Roseboom, Tessa J. ; Leeflang, Mariska M G ; Painter, Rebecca C. / Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum : A systematic review and metaanalysis. In: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014 ; Vol. 211, No. 2. pp. 150.e1-150.e15.
@article{6478c55d972d4dfb810f7f87c385ea70,
title = "Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review and metaanalysis",
abstract = "Objective Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG; protracted vomiting in pregnancy) and no single widely used set of diagnostic criteria for HG. The various definitions rely on symptoms, sometimes in combination with laboratory tests. Through a systematic review, we aimed to summarize available evidence on the diagnostic value of biomarkers for HG. This could assist diagnosis and may shed light on the, as yet, not understood cause of the disorder. Study Design We searched Medline and Embase for articles about diagnostic biomarkers for either the presence or severity of HG or nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. We defined HG as any combination of nausea, vomiting, dehydration, weight loss, or hospitalization for nausea and/or vomiting in pregnancy, in the absence of any other obvious cause for these complaints. Results We found 81 articles on 9 biomarkers. Although 65{\%} of all studies included only HG cases with ketonuria, we did not find an association between ketonuria and presence or severity of HG in 5 studies reporting on this association. Metaanalysis, with the use of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model, yielded an odds ratio of 3.2 (95{\%} confidence interval, 2.0-5.1) of Heliobacter pylori for HG, as compared with asymptomatic control subjects (sensitivity, 73{\%}; specificity, 55{\%}). Studies on human chorionic gonadotropin and thyroid hormones, leptin, estradiol, progesterone, and white blood count showed inconsistent associations with HG; lymphocytes tended to be higher in women with HG. Conclusion We did not find support for the use of ketonuria in the diagnosis of HG. H pylori serology might be useful in specific patients.",
keywords = "biomarker, diagnosis, hyperemesis gravidarum, nausea and vomiting, pregnancy",
author = "Niemeijer, {Maartje N.} and Grooten, {Iris J.} and Nikki Vos and Bais, {Joke M J} and {Van Der Post}, {Joris A.} and Mol, {Ben W.} and Roseboom, {Tessa J.} and Leeflang, {Mariska M G} and Painter, {Rebecca C.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.012",
language = "English",
volume = "211",
pages = "150.e1--150.e15",
journal = "American journal of obstetrics and gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Niemeijer, MN, Grooten, IJ, Vos, N, Bais, JMJ, Van Der Post, JA, Mol, BW, Roseboom, TJ, Leeflang, MMG & Painter, RC 2014, 'Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review and metaanalysis', American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 211, no. 2, pp. 150.e1-150.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.012

Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum : A systematic review and metaanalysis. / Niemeijer, Maartje N.; Grooten, Iris J.; Vos, Nikki; Bais, Joke M J; Van Der Post, Joris A.; Mol, Ben W.; Roseboom, Tessa J.; Leeflang, Mariska M G; Painter, Rebecca C.

In: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, Vol. 211, No. 2, 2014, p. 150.e1-150.e15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum

T2 - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

AU - Niemeijer, Maartje N.

AU - Grooten, Iris J.

AU - Vos, Nikki

AU - Bais, Joke M J

AU - Van Der Post, Joris A.

AU - Mol, Ben W.

AU - Roseboom, Tessa J.

AU - Leeflang, Mariska M G

AU - Painter, Rebecca C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG; protracted vomiting in pregnancy) and no single widely used set of diagnostic criteria for HG. The various definitions rely on symptoms, sometimes in combination with laboratory tests. Through a systematic review, we aimed to summarize available evidence on the diagnostic value of biomarkers for HG. This could assist diagnosis and may shed light on the, as yet, not understood cause of the disorder. Study Design We searched Medline and Embase for articles about diagnostic biomarkers for either the presence or severity of HG or nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. We defined HG as any combination of nausea, vomiting, dehydration, weight loss, or hospitalization for nausea and/or vomiting in pregnancy, in the absence of any other obvious cause for these complaints. Results We found 81 articles on 9 biomarkers. Although 65% of all studies included only HG cases with ketonuria, we did not find an association between ketonuria and presence or severity of HG in 5 studies reporting on this association. Metaanalysis, with the use of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model, yielded an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.0-5.1) of Heliobacter pylori for HG, as compared with asymptomatic control subjects (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 55%). Studies on human chorionic gonadotropin and thyroid hormones, leptin, estradiol, progesterone, and white blood count showed inconsistent associations with HG; lymphocytes tended to be higher in women with HG. Conclusion We did not find support for the use of ketonuria in the diagnosis of HG. H pylori serology might be useful in specific patients.

AB - Objective Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG; protracted vomiting in pregnancy) and no single widely used set of diagnostic criteria for HG. The various definitions rely on symptoms, sometimes in combination with laboratory tests. Through a systematic review, we aimed to summarize available evidence on the diagnostic value of biomarkers for HG. This could assist diagnosis and may shed light on the, as yet, not understood cause of the disorder. Study Design We searched Medline and Embase for articles about diagnostic biomarkers for either the presence or severity of HG or nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. We defined HG as any combination of nausea, vomiting, dehydration, weight loss, or hospitalization for nausea and/or vomiting in pregnancy, in the absence of any other obvious cause for these complaints. Results We found 81 articles on 9 biomarkers. Although 65% of all studies included only HG cases with ketonuria, we did not find an association between ketonuria and presence or severity of HG in 5 studies reporting on this association. Metaanalysis, with the use of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model, yielded an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.0-5.1) of Heliobacter pylori for HG, as compared with asymptomatic control subjects (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 55%). Studies on human chorionic gonadotropin and thyroid hormones, leptin, estradiol, progesterone, and white blood count showed inconsistent associations with HG; lymphocytes tended to be higher in women with HG. Conclusion We did not find support for the use of ketonuria in the diagnosis of HG. H pylori serology might be useful in specific patients.

KW - biomarker

KW - diagnosis

KW - hyperemesis gravidarum

KW - nausea and vomiting

KW - pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905095963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.012

M3 - Article

VL - 211

SP - 150.e1-150.e15

JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 2

ER -