Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: A systematic review

F. Vlemmix, J. K. Warendorf, A. N. Rosman, M. Kok, B. W J Mol, J. M. Morris, N. Nassar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Rapid development in health care has resulted in an increasing number of screening and treatment options. Consequently, there is an urgency to provide people with relevant information about benefits and risks of healthcare options in an unbiased way. Decision aids help people to make decisions by providing unbiased non-directive research evidence about all treatment options. Objective To determine the effectiveness of decision aids to improve informed decision making in pregnancy care. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE (1953-2011), EMBASE (1980-2011), CENTRAL (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library; 2011, Issue 4), Psycinfo (1806-2011) and Research Registers of ongoing trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.controlled-trials.com). Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials comparing decision aids in addition to standard care. The study population needed to be pregnant women making actual decisions concerning their pregnancy. Data collection and analysis Two independent researchers extracted data on quality of the randomised controlled trial (GRADE criteria), quality of the decision aid (IPDAS criteria), and outcome measures. Data analysis was undertaken by assessing group differences at first follow up after the interventions. Main results Ten randomised controlled trials could be included. Pooled analyses showed that decision aids significantly increased knowledge, (weighted mean difference 11.06, 95% confidence interval 4.85-17.27), decreased decisional conflict scores (weighted mean difference -3.66, 95% confidence interval -6.65 to -0.68) and decreased anxiety (weighted mean difference -1.56, 95% confidence interval -2.75 to -0.43). Conclusions Our systematic review showed the positive effect of decision aids on informed decision making in pregnancy care. Future studies should focus on increasing the uptake of decision aids in clinical practice by identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages257-266
Number of pages10
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume120
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2013

Keywords

  • Decision aids
  • informed decision making
  • obstetrics
  • pregnancy health care
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Vlemmix, F., Warendorf, J. K., Rosman, A. N., Kok, M., Mol, B. W. J., Morris, J. M., & Nassar, N. (2013). Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: A systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 120(3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12060
Vlemmix, F. ; Warendorf, J. K. ; Rosman, A. N. ; Kok, M. ; Mol, B. W J ; Morris, J. M. ; Nassar, N. / Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care : A systematic review. In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2013 ; Vol. 120, No. 3. pp. 257-266.
@article{636fb9b8d3654a128d741cb9562dd0aa,
title = "Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background Rapid development in health care has resulted in an increasing number of screening and treatment options. Consequently, there is an urgency to provide people with relevant information about benefits and risks of healthcare options in an unbiased way. Decision aids help people to make decisions by providing unbiased non-directive research evidence about all treatment options. Objective To determine the effectiveness of decision aids to improve informed decision making in pregnancy care. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE (1953-2011), EMBASE (1980-2011), CENTRAL (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library; 2011, Issue 4), Psycinfo (1806-2011) and Research Registers of ongoing trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.controlled-trials.com). Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials comparing decision aids in addition to standard care. The study population needed to be pregnant women making actual decisions concerning their pregnancy. Data collection and analysis Two independent researchers extracted data on quality of the randomised controlled trial (GRADE criteria), quality of the decision aid (IPDAS criteria), and outcome measures. Data analysis was undertaken by assessing group differences at first follow up after the interventions. Main results Ten randomised controlled trials could be included. Pooled analyses showed that decision aids significantly increased knowledge, (weighted mean difference 11.06, 95{\%} confidence interval 4.85-17.27), decreased decisional conflict scores (weighted mean difference -3.66, 95{\%} confidence interval -6.65 to -0.68) and decreased anxiety (weighted mean difference -1.56, 95{\%} confidence interval -2.75 to -0.43). Conclusions Our systematic review showed the positive effect of decision aids on informed decision making in pregnancy care. Future studies should focus on increasing the uptake of decision aids in clinical practice by identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation.",
keywords = "Decision aids, informed decision making, obstetrics, pregnancy health care, systematic review",
author = "F. Vlemmix and Warendorf, {J. K.} and Rosman, {A. N.} and M. Kok and Mol, {B. W J} and Morris, {J. M.} and N. Nassar",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.12060",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "257--266",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care : A systematic review. / Vlemmix, F.; Warendorf, J. K.; Rosman, A. N.; Kok, M.; Mol, B. W J; Morris, J. M.; Nassar, N.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 120, No. 3, 01.02.2013, p. 257-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care

T2 - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

AU - Vlemmix, F.

AU - Warendorf, J. K.

AU - Rosman, A. N.

AU - Kok, M.

AU - Mol, B. W J

AU - Morris, J. M.

AU - Nassar, N.

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Background Rapid development in health care has resulted in an increasing number of screening and treatment options. Consequently, there is an urgency to provide people with relevant information about benefits and risks of healthcare options in an unbiased way. Decision aids help people to make decisions by providing unbiased non-directive research evidence about all treatment options. Objective To determine the effectiveness of decision aids to improve informed decision making in pregnancy care. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE (1953-2011), EMBASE (1980-2011), CENTRAL (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library; 2011, Issue 4), Psycinfo (1806-2011) and Research Registers of ongoing trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.controlled-trials.com). Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials comparing decision aids in addition to standard care. The study population needed to be pregnant women making actual decisions concerning their pregnancy. Data collection and analysis Two independent researchers extracted data on quality of the randomised controlled trial (GRADE criteria), quality of the decision aid (IPDAS criteria), and outcome measures. Data analysis was undertaken by assessing group differences at first follow up after the interventions. Main results Ten randomised controlled trials could be included. Pooled analyses showed that decision aids significantly increased knowledge, (weighted mean difference 11.06, 95% confidence interval 4.85-17.27), decreased decisional conflict scores (weighted mean difference -3.66, 95% confidence interval -6.65 to -0.68) and decreased anxiety (weighted mean difference -1.56, 95% confidence interval -2.75 to -0.43). Conclusions Our systematic review showed the positive effect of decision aids on informed decision making in pregnancy care. Future studies should focus on increasing the uptake of decision aids in clinical practice by identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation.

AB - Background Rapid development in health care has resulted in an increasing number of screening and treatment options. Consequently, there is an urgency to provide people with relevant information about benefits and risks of healthcare options in an unbiased way. Decision aids help people to make decisions by providing unbiased non-directive research evidence about all treatment options. Objective To determine the effectiveness of decision aids to improve informed decision making in pregnancy care. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE (1953-2011), EMBASE (1980-2011), CENTRAL (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library; 2011, Issue 4), Psycinfo (1806-2011) and Research Registers of ongoing trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.controlled-trials.com). Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials comparing decision aids in addition to standard care. The study population needed to be pregnant women making actual decisions concerning their pregnancy. Data collection and analysis Two independent researchers extracted data on quality of the randomised controlled trial (GRADE criteria), quality of the decision aid (IPDAS criteria), and outcome measures. Data analysis was undertaken by assessing group differences at first follow up after the interventions. Main results Ten randomised controlled trials could be included. Pooled analyses showed that decision aids significantly increased knowledge, (weighted mean difference 11.06, 95% confidence interval 4.85-17.27), decreased decisional conflict scores (weighted mean difference -3.66, 95% confidence interval -6.65 to -0.68) and decreased anxiety (weighted mean difference -1.56, 95% confidence interval -2.75 to -0.43). Conclusions Our systematic review showed the positive effect of decision aids on informed decision making in pregnancy care. Future studies should focus on increasing the uptake of decision aids in clinical practice by identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation.

KW - Decision aids

KW - informed decision making

KW - obstetrics

KW - pregnancy health care

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872401473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.12060

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.12060

M3 - Review article

VL - 120

SP - 257

EP - 266

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 3

ER -