Current and future use of point-of-care tests in primary care: An international survey in Australia, Belgium, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA

Jeremy Howick, Jochen W.L. Cals, Caroline Jones, Christopher P. Price, Annette Plüddemann, Carl Heneghan, Marjolein Y. Berger, Frank Buntinx, John Hickner, Wilson Pace, Tony Badrick, Ann Van Den Bruel, Caroline Laurence, Henk C. Van Weert, Evie Van Severen, Adriana Parrella, Matthew Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Despite the growing number of point-of-care (POC) tests available, little research has assessed primary care clinician need for such tests. We therefore aimed to determine which POC tests they actually use or would like to use (if not currently available in their practice). Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Primary care in Australia, Belgium (Flanders region only), the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. Participants: Primary care doctors (general practitioners, family physicians). Main measures: We asked respondents to (1) identify conditions for which a POC test could help inform diagnosis, (2) from a list of tests provided: evaluate which POC tests they currently use (and how frequently) and (3) determine which tests (from that same list) they would like to use in the future (and how frequently). Results: 2770 primary care clinicians across five countries responded. Respondents in all countries wanted POC tests to help them diagnose acute conditions (infections, acute cardiac disease, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), and some chronic conditions (diabetes, anaemia). Based on the list of POC tests provided, the most common tests currently used were: urine pregnancy, urine leucocytes or nitrite and blood glucose. The most commonly reported tests respondents expressed a wish to use in the future were: D-dimer, troponin and chlamydia. The UK and the USA reported a higher actual and desired use for POC tests than Australia, Belgium and the Netherlands. Our limited data suggest (but do not confirm) representativeness. Conclusions: Primary care clinicians in all five countries expressed a desire for POC tests to help them diagnose a range of acute and chronic conditions. Rates of current reported use and desired future use were generally high for a small selection of POC tests, but varied across countries. Future research is warranted to explore how specific POC tests might improve primary care.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere005611
JournalBMJ open
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Howick, Jeremy ; Cals, Jochen W.L. ; Jones, Caroline ; Price, Christopher P. ; Plüddemann, Annette ; Heneghan, Carl ; Berger, Marjolein Y. ; Buntinx, Frank ; Hickner, John ; Pace, Wilson ; Badrick, Tony ; Van Den Bruel, Ann ; Laurence, Caroline ; Van Weert, Henk C. ; Van Severen, Evie ; Parrella, Adriana ; Thompson, Matthew. / Current and future use of point-of-care tests in primary care : An international survey in Australia, Belgium, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA. In: BMJ open. 2014 ; Vol. 4, No. 8.
@article{fdff623b6fb44165ac85543ddd07e33b,
title = "Current and future use of point-of-care tests in primary care: An international survey in Australia, Belgium, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA",
abstract = "Objective: Despite the growing number of point-of-care (POC) tests available, little research has assessed primary care clinician need for such tests. We therefore aimed to determine which POC tests they actually use or would like to use (if not currently available in their practice). Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Primary care in Australia, Belgium (Flanders region only), the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. Participants: Primary care doctors (general practitioners, family physicians). Main measures: We asked respondents to (1) identify conditions for which a POC test could help inform diagnosis, (2) from a list of tests provided: evaluate which POC tests they currently use (and how frequently) and (3) determine which tests (from that same list) they would like to use in the future (and how frequently). Results: 2770 primary care clinicians across five countries responded. Respondents in all countries wanted POC tests to help them diagnose acute conditions (infections, acute cardiac disease, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), and some chronic conditions (diabetes, anaemia). Based on the list of POC tests provided, the most common tests currently used were: urine pregnancy, urine leucocytes or nitrite and blood glucose. The most commonly reported tests respondents expressed a wish to use in the future were: D-dimer, troponin and chlamydia. The UK and the USA reported a higher actual and desired use for POC tests than Australia, Belgium and the Netherlands. Our limited data suggest (but do not confirm) representativeness. Conclusions: Primary care clinicians in all five countries expressed a desire for POC tests to help them diagnose a range of acute and chronic conditions. Rates of current reported use and desired future use were generally high for a small selection of POC tests, but varied across countries. Future research is warranted to explore how specific POC tests might improve primary care.",
author = "Jeremy Howick and Cals, {Jochen W.L.} and Caroline Jones and Price, {Christopher P.} and Annette Pl{\"u}ddemann and Carl Heneghan and Berger, {Marjolein Y.} and Frank Buntinx and John Hickner and Wilson Pace and Tony Badrick and {Van Den Bruel}, Ann and Caroline Laurence and {Van Weert}, {Henk C.} and {Van Severen}, Evie and Adriana Parrella and Matthew Thompson",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005611",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

Howick, J, Cals, JWL, Jones, C, Price, CP, Plüddemann, A, Heneghan, C, Berger, MY, Buntinx, F, Hickner, J, Pace, W, Badrick, T, Van Den Bruel, A, Laurence, C, Van Weert, HC, Van Severen, E, Parrella, A & Thompson, M 2014, 'Current and future use of point-of-care tests in primary care: An international survey in Australia, Belgium, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA', BMJ open, vol. 4, no. 8, e005611. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005611

Current and future use of point-of-care tests in primary care : An international survey in Australia, Belgium, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA. / Howick, Jeremy; Cals, Jochen W.L.; Jones, Caroline; Price, Christopher P.; Plüddemann, Annette; Heneghan, Carl; Berger, Marjolein Y.; Buntinx, Frank; Hickner, John; Pace, Wilson; Badrick, Tony; Van Den Bruel, Ann; Laurence, Caroline; Van Weert, Henk C.; Van Severen, Evie; Parrella, Adriana; Thompson, Matthew.

In: BMJ open, Vol. 4, No. 8, e005611, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current and future use of point-of-care tests in primary care

T2 - BMJ Open

AU - Howick, Jeremy

AU - Cals, Jochen W.L.

AU - Jones, Caroline

AU - Price, Christopher P.

AU - Plüddemann, Annette

AU - Heneghan, Carl

AU - Berger, Marjolein Y.

AU - Buntinx, Frank

AU - Hickner, John

AU - Pace, Wilson

AU - Badrick, Tony

AU - Van Den Bruel, Ann

AU - Laurence, Caroline

AU - Van Weert, Henk C.

AU - Van Severen, Evie

AU - Parrella, Adriana

AU - Thompson, Matthew

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective: Despite the growing number of point-of-care (POC) tests available, little research has assessed primary care clinician need for such tests. We therefore aimed to determine which POC tests they actually use or would like to use (if not currently available in their practice). Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Primary care in Australia, Belgium (Flanders region only), the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. Participants: Primary care doctors (general practitioners, family physicians). Main measures: We asked respondents to (1) identify conditions for which a POC test could help inform diagnosis, (2) from a list of tests provided: evaluate which POC tests they currently use (and how frequently) and (3) determine which tests (from that same list) they would like to use in the future (and how frequently). Results: 2770 primary care clinicians across five countries responded. Respondents in all countries wanted POC tests to help them diagnose acute conditions (infections, acute cardiac disease, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), and some chronic conditions (diabetes, anaemia). Based on the list of POC tests provided, the most common tests currently used were: urine pregnancy, urine leucocytes or nitrite and blood glucose. The most commonly reported tests respondents expressed a wish to use in the future were: D-dimer, troponin and chlamydia. The UK and the USA reported a higher actual and desired use for POC tests than Australia, Belgium and the Netherlands. Our limited data suggest (but do not confirm) representativeness. Conclusions: Primary care clinicians in all five countries expressed a desire for POC tests to help them diagnose a range of acute and chronic conditions. Rates of current reported use and desired future use were generally high for a small selection of POC tests, but varied across countries. Future research is warranted to explore how specific POC tests might improve primary care.

AB - Objective: Despite the growing number of point-of-care (POC) tests available, little research has assessed primary care clinician need for such tests. We therefore aimed to determine which POC tests they actually use or would like to use (if not currently available in their practice). Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Primary care in Australia, Belgium (Flanders region only), the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. Participants: Primary care doctors (general practitioners, family physicians). Main measures: We asked respondents to (1) identify conditions for which a POC test could help inform diagnosis, (2) from a list of tests provided: evaluate which POC tests they currently use (and how frequently) and (3) determine which tests (from that same list) they would like to use in the future (and how frequently). Results: 2770 primary care clinicians across five countries responded. Respondents in all countries wanted POC tests to help them diagnose acute conditions (infections, acute cardiac disease, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), and some chronic conditions (diabetes, anaemia). Based on the list of POC tests provided, the most common tests currently used were: urine pregnancy, urine leucocytes or nitrite and blood glucose. The most commonly reported tests respondents expressed a wish to use in the future were: D-dimer, troponin and chlamydia. The UK and the USA reported a higher actual and desired use for POC tests than Australia, Belgium and the Netherlands. Our limited data suggest (but do not confirm) representativeness. Conclusions: Primary care clinicians in all five countries expressed a desire for POC tests to help them diagnose a range of acute and chronic conditions. Rates of current reported use and desired future use were generally high for a small selection of POC tests, but varied across countries. Future research is warranted to explore how specific POC tests might improve primary care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905864370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005611

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005611

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 8

M1 - e005611

ER -