Cost-effectiveness of hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertile couples

Ben W.J. Mol, John A. Collins, Fulco Van Der Veen, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness analysis of hysterosalpingography (HSG), laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing (CAT) in subfertile couples. Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting: Decision analytic framework.Patient(s): Data of >2,000 subfertile couples in the Canadian Infertility Treatment Evaluation Study. Results of CA-125 measurement and CAT were simulated from baseline characteristics.Intervention(s): Expectant management was considered to be the reference strategy (strategy 1). In strategy 2 and 3, IVF was offered either immediately or after 2.5 years. In strategy 4, the decision to offer or delay treatment was based on the couple's chance of spontaneous conception. Nine strategies incorporated combinations of CAT, CA-125 measurement, HSG, and laparoscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Expected live birth rates, expected number of IVF cycles, and expected total costs. Result(s): The strategy starting with CAT was the most cost-effective in couples whose 3-year chance of conception was >14%, whereas the strategy starting with HSG was the most cost-effective in couples with worse fertility prospects. Conclusion(s): The diagnostic work-up to detect tubal pathology in subfertile couples should start with CAT in couples with relatively good fertility prospects and immediate HSG in couples with relatively poor fertility prospects.

LanguageEnglish
Pages571-580
Number of pages10
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2001

Keywords

  • Chlamydia antibody testing
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Diagnosis
  • Hysterosalpingography
  • Laparoscopy
  • Tubal pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Mol, Ben W.J. ; Collins, John A. ; Van Der Veen, Fulco ; Bossuyt, Patrick M.M. / Cost-effectiveness of hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertile couples. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2001 ; Vol. 75, No. 3. pp. 571-580.
@article{05e661e92bfe403fbcef94ed67e80870,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertile couples",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness analysis of hysterosalpingography (HSG), laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing (CAT) in subfertile couples. Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting: Decision analytic framework.Patient(s): Data of >2,000 subfertile couples in the Canadian Infertility Treatment Evaluation Study. Results of CA-125 measurement and CAT were simulated from baseline characteristics.Intervention(s): Expectant management was considered to be the reference strategy (strategy 1). In strategy 2 and 3, IVF was offered either immediately or after 2.5 years. In strategy 4, the decision to offer or delay treatment was based on the couple's chance of spontaneous conception. Nine strategies incorporated combinations of CAT, CA-125 measurement, HSG, and laparoscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Expected live birth rates, expected number of IVF cycles, and expected total costs. Result(s): The strategy starting with CAT was the most cost-effective in couples whose 3-year chance of conception was >14{\%}, whereas the strategy starting with HSG was the most cost-effective in couples with worse fertility prospects. Conclusion(s): The diagnostic work-up to detect tubal pathology in subfertile couples should start with CAT in couples with relatively good fertility prospects and immediate HSG in couples with relatively poor fertility prospects.",
keywords = "Chlamydia antibody testing, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Diagnosis, Hysterosalpingography, Laparoscopy, Tubal pathology",
author = "Mol, {Ben W.J.} and Collins, {John A.} and {Van Der Veen}, Fulco and Bossuyt, {Patrick M.M.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01748-9",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "571--580",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Cost-effectiveness of hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertile couples. / Mol, Ben W.J.; Collins, John A.; Van Der Veen, Fulco; Bossuyt, Patrick M.M.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 75, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 571-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertile couples

AU - Mol, Ben W.J.

AU - Collins, John A.

AU - Van Der Veen, Fulco

AU - Bossuyt, Patrick M.M.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness analysis of hysterosalpingography (HSG), laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing (CAT) in subfertile couples. Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting: Decision analytic framework.Patient(s): Data of >2,000 subfertile couples in the Canadian Infertility Treatment Evaluation Study. Results of CA-125 measurement and CAT were simulated from baseline characteristics.Intervention(s): Expectant management was considered to be the reference strategy (strategy 1). In strategy 2 and 3, IVF was offered either immediately or after 2.5 years. In strategy 4, the decision to offer or delay treatment was based on the couple's chance of spontaneous conception. Nine strategies incorporated combinations of CAT, CA-125 measurement, HSG, and laparoscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Expected live birth rates, expected number of IVF cycles, and expected total costs. Result(s): The strategy starting with CAT was the most cost-effective in couples whose 3-year chance of conception was >14%, whereas the strategy starting with HSG was the most cost-effective in couples with worse fertility prospects. Conclusion(s): The diagnostic work-up to detect tubal pathology in subfertile couples should start with CAT in couples with relatively good fertility prospects and immediate HSG in couples with relatively poor fertility prospects.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness analysis of hysterosalpingography (HSG), laparoscopy, and Chlamydia antibody testing (CAT) in subfertile couples. Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting: Decision analytic framework.Patient(s): Data of >2,000 subfertile couples in the Canadian Infertility Treatment Evaluation Study. Results of CA-125 measurement and CAT were simulated from baseline characteristics.Intervention(s): Expectant management was considered to be the reference strategy (strategy 1). In strategy 2 and 3, IVF was offered either immediately or after 2.5 years. In strategy 4, the decision to offer or delay treatment was based on the couple's chance of spontaneous conception. Nine strategies incorporated combinations of CAT, CA-125 measurement, HSG, and laparoscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Expected live birth rates, expected number of IVF cycles, and expected total costs. Result(s): The strategy starting with CAT was the most cost-effective in couples whose 3-year chance of conception was >14%, whereas the strategy starting with HSG was the most cost-effective in couples with worse fertility prospects. Conclusion(s): The diagnostic work-up to detect tubal pathology in subfertile couples should start with CAT in couples with relatively good fertility prospects and immediate HSG in couples with relatively poor fertility prospects.

KW - Chlamydia antibody testing

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Hysterosalpingography

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Tubal pathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035128330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01748-9

DO - 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01748-9

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 571

EP - 580

JO - Fertility and Sterility

T2 - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 3

ER -