Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women

F. P H L J Dijkhuizen, Laila D. De Vries, B. W J Mol, H. A M Brölmann, H. M. Peters, Eveline Moret, A. P M Heintz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and saline infusion sonography (SIS) for detecting intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Method: Consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding were included. All women underwent TVS and SIS before their hysterectomy. The findings at TVS and SIS were compared with the findings of the hysterectomy specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. Results: The results of 50 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding were evaluated. Histological examination revealed normal endometrial histology in 27 patients, submucus myomas in 13 patients and intracavitary polyps in 10 patients. The sensitivity of TVS in directly visualizing intracavitary abnormalities was 61% for a specificity of 96%. The likelihood ratio of presence of an intracavitary abnormality was 16 and the likelihood ratio of absence of such a finding was 0.41. When defining abnormality at TVS as direct visualization of an intracavitary abnormality or an increased endometrial thickness (cut-off level 5 mm), the sensitivity of TVS was 87% for a specificity of 56%, with corresponding likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.23, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SIS was 100% and 85% with likelihood ratios of 6 and 0.0, respectively. No intracavitary abnormality was missed by SIS. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of SIS is higher than the accuracy of TVS. A combined approach using endometrial thickness measurement by TVS and, reserving SIS for patients with increased (> 5 mm) endometrial thickness, or endometrium inadequately visualized on TVS, is the optimal method of reducing the hysteroscopy rate.

LanguageEnglish
Pages372-376
Number of pages5
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Abnormal uterine bleeding
  • Endometrial thickness
  • Saline infusion sonography
  • Transvaginal ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Dijkhuizen, F. P H L J ; De Vries, Laila D. ; Mol, B. W J ; Brölmann, H. A M ; Peters, H. M. ; Moret, Eveline ; Heintz, A. P M. / Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women. In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 372-376.
@article{71fb084bbd2f4b819ceb1113ff81da8b,
title = "Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and saline infusion sonography (SIS) for detecting intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Method: Consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding were included. All women underwent TVS and SIS before their hysterectomy. The findings at TVS and SIS were compared with the findings of the hysterectomy specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. Results: The results of 50 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding were evaluated. Histological examination revealed normal endometrial histology in 27 patients, submucus myomas in 13 patients and intracavitary polyps in 10 patients. The sensitivity of TVS in directly visualizing intracavitary abnormalities was 61{\%} for a specificity of 96{\%}. The likelihood ratio of presence of an intracavitary abnormality was 16 and the likelihood ratio of absence of such a finding was 0.41. When defining abnormality at TVS as direct visualization of an intracavitary abnormality or an increased endometrial thickness (cut-off level 5 mm), the sensitivity of TVS was 87{\%} for a specificity of 56{\%}, with corresponding likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.23, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SIS was 100{\%} and 85{\%} with likelihood ratios of 6 and 0.0, respectively. No intracavitary abnormality was missed by SIS. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of SIS is higher than the accuracy of TVS. A combined approach using endometrial thickness measurement by TVS and, reserving SIS for patients with increased (> 5 mm) endometrial thickness, or endometrium inadequately visualized on TVS, is the optimal method of reducing the hysteroscopy rate.",
keywords = "Abnormal uterine bleeding, Endometrial thickness, Saline infusion sonography, Transvaginal ultrasonography",
author = "Dijkhuizen, {F. P H L J} and {De Vries}, {Laila D.} and Mol, {B. W J} and Br{\"o}lmann, {H. A M} and Peters, {H. M.} and Eveline Moret and Heintz, {A. P M}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00115.x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "372--376",
journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0960-7692",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women. / Dijkhuizen, F. P H L J; De Vries, Laila D.; Mol, B. W J; Brölmann, H. A M; Peters, H. M.; Moret, Eveline; Heintz, A. P M.

In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2000, p. 372-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women

AU - Dijkhuizen, F. P H L J

AU - De Vries, Laila D.

AU - Mol, B. W J

AU - Brölmann, H. A M

AU - Peters, H. M.

AU - Moret, Eveline

AU - Heintz, A. P M

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and saline infusion sonography (SIS) for detecting intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Method: Consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding were included. All women underwent TVS and SIS before their hysterectomy. The findings at TVS and SIS were compared with the findings of the hysterectomy specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. Results: The results of 50 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding were evaluated. Histological examination revealed normal endometrial histology in 27 patients, submucus myomas in 13 patients and intracavitary polyps in 10 patients. The sensitivity of TVS in directly visualizing intracavitary abnormalities was 61% for a specificity of 96%. The likelihood ratio of presence of an intracavitary abnormality was 16 and the likelihood ratio of absence of such a finding was 0.41. When defining abnormality at TVS as direct visualization of an intracavitary abnormality or an increased endometrial thickness (cut-off level 5 mm), the sensitivity of TVS was 87% for a specificity of 56%, with corresponding likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.23, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SIS was 100% and 85% with likelihood ratios of 6 and 0.0, respectively. No intracavitary abnormality was missed by SIS. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of SIS is higher than the accuracy of TVS. A combined approach using endometrial thickness measurement by TVS and, reserving SIS for patients with increased (> 5 mm) endometrial thickness, or endometrium inadequately visualized on TVS, is the optimal method of reducing the hysteroscopy rate.

AB - Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and saline infusion sonography (SIS) for detecting intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Method: Consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding were included. All women underwent TVS and SIS before their hysterectomy. The findings at TVS and SIS were compared with the findings of the hysterectomy specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. Results: The results of 50 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding were evaluated. Histological examination revealed normal endometrial histology in 27 patients, submucus myomas in 13 patients and intracavitary polyps in 10 patients. The sensitivity of TVS in directly visualizing intracavitary abnormalities was 61% for a specificity of 96%. The likelihood ratio of presence of an intracavitary abnormality was 16 and the likelihood ratio of absence of such a finding was 0.41. When defining abnormality at TVS as direct visualization of an intracavitary abnormality or an increased endometrial thickness (cut-off level 5 mm), the sensitivity of TVS was 87% for a specificity of 56%, with corresponding likelihood ratios of 2 and 0.23, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SIS was 100% and 85% with likelihood ratios of 6 and 0.0, respectively. No intracavitary abnormality was missed by SIS. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of SIS is higher than the accuracy of TVS. A combined approach using endometrial thickness measurement by TVS and, reserving SIS for patients with increased (> 5 mm) endometrial thickness, or endometrium inadequately visualized on TVS, is the optimal method of reducing the hysteroscopy rate.

KW - Abnormal uterine bleeding

KW - Endometrial thickness

KW - Saline infusion sonography

KW - Transvaginal ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034538995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00115.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00115.x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 372

EP - 376

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

T2 - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0960-7692

IS - 5

ER -