Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men

Ian R. Pateyjohns, Grant D. Brinkworth, Jonathan D. Buckley, Manny Noakes, Peter M. Clifton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) of body composition using three different methods against DXA in overweight and obese men. Research Methods and Procedures: Forty-three healthy overweight or obese men (ages 25 to 60 years; BMI, 28 to 43 kg/m2) underwent BIA assessment of body composition using the ImpediMed SFB7 (version 6; ImpediMed, Ltd., Eight Mile Plains, Queensland, Australia) in multifrequency mode (Imp-MF) and DF50 single-frequency mode (Imp-SF) and the Tanita UltimateScale (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Validity was assessed by comparison against DXA using linear regression and limits of agreement analysis. Results: All three BIA methods showed good relative agreement with DXA [Imp-MF: fat mass (FM), r 2 = 0.81; fat-free mass (FFM), r2 = 0.81; percentage body fat (BF%), r2 = 0.69; Imp-SF: FM, r2 = 0.65; FFM, r 2 = 0.76; BF%, r2 = 0.40; Tanita: BF%, r2 = 0.44; all p < 0.001]. Absolute agreement between DXA and Imp-MF was poor, as indicated by a large bias and wide limits of agreement (bias, ± 1.96 standard deviation; FM, -6.6 ± 7.7 kg; FFM, 8.0 ± 7.1 kg; BF%, -7.0 ± 6.6%). Imp-SF and Tanita exhibited a smaller bias but wide limits of agreement (Imp-SF: FM, -1.1 ± 8.5 kg; FFM, 2.5 ± 7.9 kg; BF%, -1.7 ± 7.3%; Tanita: BF%, 1.2 ± 9.5%). Discussion: Compared with DXA, Imp-MF produced large bias and wide limits of agreement, and its accuracy estimating body composition in overweight or obese men was poor. Imp-SF and Tanita demonstrated little bias and may be useful for group comparisons, but their utility for assessment of body composition in individuals is limited.

LanguageEnglish
Pages2064-2070
Number of pages7
JournalObesity
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bioelectrical impedance analysis
  • Body composition
  • Body fat
  • Multifrequency
  • Single-frequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Pateyjohns, I. R., Brinkworth, G. D., Buckley, J. D., Noakes, M., & Clifton, P. M. (2006). Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. Obesity, 14(11), 2064-2070. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.241
Pateyjohns, Ian R. ; Brinkworth, Grant D. ; Buckley, Jonathan D. ; Noakes, Manny ; Clifton, Peter M. / Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. In: Obesity. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 11. pp. 2064-2070.
@article{c9144bc8245e4127a20ce5bc24823d5c,
title = "Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men",
abstract = "Objective: To compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) of body composition using three different methods against DXA in overweight and obese men. Research Methods and Procedures: Forty-three healthy overweight or obese men (ages 25 to 60 years; BMI, 28 to 43 kg/m2) underwent BIA assessment of body composition using the ImpediMed SFB7 (version 6; ImpediMed, Ltd., Eight Mile Plains, Queensland, Australia) in multifrequency mode (Imp-MF) and DF50 single-frequency mode (Imp-SF) and the Tanita UltimateScale (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Validity was assessed by comparison against DXA using linear regression and limits of agreement analysis. Results: All three BIA methods showed good relative agreement with DXA [Imp-MF: fat mass (FM), r 2 = 0.81; fat-free mass (FFM), r2 = 0.81; percentage body fat (BF{\%}), r2 = 0.69; Imp-SF: FM, r2 = 0.65; FFM, r 2 = 0.76; BF{\%}, r2 = 0.40; Tanita: BF{\%}, r2 = 0.44; all p < 0.001]. Absolute agreement between DXA and Imp-MF was poor, as indicated by a large bias and wide limits of agreement (bias, ± 1.96 standard deviation; FM, -6.6 ± 7.7 kg; FFM, 8.0 ± 7.1 kg; BF{\%}, -7.0 ± 6.6{\%}). Imp-SF and Tanita exhibited a smaller bias but wide limits of agreement (Imp-SF: FM, -1.1 ± 8.5 kg; FFM, 2.5 ± 7.9 kg; BF{\%}, -1.7 ± 7.3{\%}; Tanita: BF{\%}, 1.2 ± 9.5{\%}). Discussion: Compared with DXA, Imp-MF produced large bias and wide limits of agreement, and its accuracy estimating body composition in overweight or obese men was poor. Imp-SF and Tanita demonstrated little bias and may be useful for group comparisons, but their utility for assessment of body composition in individuals is limited.",
keywords = "Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Body composition, Body fat, Multifrequency, Single-frequency",
author = "Pateyjohns, {Ian R.} and Brinkworth, {Grant D.} and Buckley, {Jonathan D.} and Manny Noakes and Clifton, {Peter M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1038/oby.2006.241",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "2064--2070",
journal = "Obesity",
issn = "1930-7381",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

Pateyjohns, IR, Brinkworth, GD, Buckley, JD, Noakes, M & Clifton, PM 2006, 'Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men', Obesity, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2064-2070. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.241

Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. / Pateyjohns, Ian R.; Brinkworth, Grant D.; Buckley, Jonathan D.; Noakes, Manny; Clifton, Peter M.

In: Obesity, Vol. 14, No. 11, 11.2006, p. 2064-2070.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men

AU - Pateyjohns, Ian R.

AU - Brinkworth, Grant D.

AU - Buckley, Jonathan D.

AU - Noakes, Manny

AU - Clifton, Peter M.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Objective: To compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) of body composition using three different methods against DXA in overweight and obese men. Research Methods and Procedures: Forty-three healthy overweight or obese men (ages 25 to 60 years; BMI, 28 to 43 kg/m2) underwent BIA assessment of body composition using the ImpediMed SFB7 (version 6; ImpediMed, Ltd., Eight Mile Plains, Queensland, Australia) in multifrequency mode (Imp-MF) and DF50 single-frequency mode (Imp-SF) and the Tanita UltimateScale (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Validity was assessed by comparison against DXA using linear regression and limits of agreement analysis. Results: All three BIA methods showed good relative agreement with DXA [Imp-MF: fat mass (FM), r 2 = 0.81; fat-free mass (FFM), r2 = 0.81; percentage body fat (BF%), r2 = 0.69; Imp-SF: FM, r2 = 0.65; FFM, r 2 = 0.76; BF%, r2 = 0.40; Tanita: BF%, r2 = 0.44; all p < 0.001]. Absolute agreement between DXA and Imp-MF was poor, as indicated by a large bias and wide limits of agreement (bias, ± 1.96 standard deviation; FM, -6.6 ± 7.7 kg; FFM, 8.0 ± 7.1 kg; BF%, -7.0 ± 6.6%). Imp-SF and Tanita exhibited a smaller bias but wide limits of agreement (Imp-SF: FM, -1.1 ± 8.5 kg; FFM, 2.5 ± 7.9 kg; BF%, -1.7 ± 7.3%; Tanita: BF%, 1.2 ± 9.5%). Discussion: Compared with DXA, Imp-MF produced large bias and wide limits of agreement, and its accuracy estimating body composition in overweight or obese men was poor. Imp-SF and Tanita demonstrated little bias and may be useful for group comparisons, but their utility for assessment of body composition in individuals is limited.

AB - Objective: To compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) of body composition using three different methods against DXA in overweight and obese men. Research Methods and Procedures: Forty-three healthy overweight or obese men (ages 25 to 60 years; BMI, 28 to 43 kg/m2) underwent BIA assessment of body composition using the ImpediMed SFB7 (version 6; ImpediMed, Ltd., Eight Mile Plains, Queensland, Australia) in multifrequency mode (Imp-MF) and DF50 single-frequency mode (Imp-SF) and the Tanita UltimateScale (Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Validity was assessed by comparison against DXA using linear regression and limits of agreement analysis. Results: All three BIA methods showed good relative agreement with DXA [Imp-MF: fat mass (FM), r 2 = 0.81; fat-free mass (FFM), r2 = 0.81; percentage body fat (BF%), r2 = 0.69; Imp-SF: FM, r2 = 0.65; FFM, r 2 = 0.76; BF%, r2 = 0.40; Tanita: BF%, r2 = 0.44; all p < 0.001]. Absolute agreement between DXA and Imp-MF was poor, as indicated by a large bias and wide limits of agreement (bias, ± 1.96 standard deviation; FM, -6.6 ± 7.7 kg; FFM, 8.0 ± 7.1 kg; BF%, -7.0 ± 6.6%). Imp-SF and Tanita exhibited a smaller bias but wide limits of agreement (Imp-SF: FM, -1.1 ± 8.5 kg; FFM, 2.5 ± 7.9 kg; BF%, -1.7 ± 7.3%; Tanita: BF%, 1.2 ± 9.5%). Discussion: Compared with DXA, Imp-MF produced large bias and wide limits of agreement, and its accuracy estimating body composition in overweight or obese men was poor. Imp-SF and Tanita demonstrated little bias and may be useful for group comparisons, but their utility for assessment of body composition in individuals is limited.

KW - Bioelectrical impedance analysis

KW - Body composition

KW - Body fat

KW - Multifrequency

KW - Single-frequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846304246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/oby.2006.241

DO - 10.1038/oby.2006.241

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 2064

EP - 2070

JO - Obesity

T2 - Obesity

JF - Obesity

SN - 1930-7381

IS - 11

ER -

Pateyjohns IR, Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, Noakes M, Clifton PM. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. Obesity. 2006 Nov;14(11):2064-2070. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.241