Comparison of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage and Scar Using Multielectrode Fast Automated Mapping versus Point-by-Point Contact Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Repeat Ablation

Jackson J. Liang, Melissa A. Elafros, Daniele Muser, Rajeev K. Pathak, Pasquale Santangeli, Gregory E. Supple, Robert D. Schaller, David S. Frankel, Sanjay Dixit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar voltage criteria to delineate left atrial (LA) scar have been derived using point-by-point (PBP) contact electroanatomical mapping. It remains unclear how PBP-derived LA scar correlates with multielectrode fast automated mapping (ME-FAM) derived scar. We aimed to correlate scar and bipolar voltages from LA maps created using PBP versus ME-FAM. Methods and Results: In consecutive patients undergoing repeat AF ablation, 2 separate LA maps were created using PBP and ME-FAM during sinus rhythm before ablation. Contiguous areas in the LA with a bipolar voltage cutoff of ≤0.2 mV represented dense scar; LA scar percentage was calculated for each map. Each LA shell was divided into 9 regions and each region further subdivided into 4 quadrants for additional analysis; mean voltages of all points obtained using PBP versus ME-FAM in each region were compared. Forty maps (20 PBP: mean 228.5 ± 95.6 points; 20 ME-FAM: 923.0 ± 382.6 points) were created in 20 patients. Mapping time with ME-FAM was shorter compared with PBP (13.3 ± 5.3 vs. 34.4 ± 13.1 minutes; P < 0.001). Mean LA scar percentage was higher with PBP compared with ME-FAM (15.5 ± 17.1% vs. 12.8 ± 17.6%; P = 0.04). Mean PBP voltage distribution was lower (compared with ME-FAM) in the septum (0.95 ± 0.73 vs. 1.46 ± 0.99 mV; P = 0.009), posterior wall (0.84 ± 0.42 vs. 1.40 ± 0.83 mV; P = 0.0008), roof (0.78 ± 0.80 vs. 1.39 ± 1.09 mV; P = 0.0003), and right PV–LA junction (0.34 ± 0.25 vs. 0.59 ± 0.50 mV; P = 0.01) regions, while voltages were similar in all other LA regions (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: In AF patients undergoing repeat ablation, bipolar voltage is greater in certain LA segments with ME-FAM compared with PBP mapping.

LanguageEnglish
Pages280-288
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • catheter ablation
  • left atrial scar
  • mapping
  • scar mapping
  • voltage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Liang, Jackson J. ; Elafros, Melissa A. ; Muser, Daniele ; Pathak, Rajeev K. ; Santangeli, Pasquale ; Supple, Gregory E. ; Schaller, Robert D. ; Frankel, David S. ; Dixit, Sanjay. / Comparison of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage and Scar Using Multielectrode Fast Automated Mapping versus Point-by-Point Contact Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Repeat Ablation. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 280-288.
@article{363609ce75df41f791d8afb0075e9f4b,
title = "Comparison of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage and Scar Using Multielectrode Fast Automated Mapping versus Point-by-Point Contact Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Repeat Ablation",
abstract = "Introduction: Bipolar voltage criteria to delineate left atrial (LA) scar have been derived using point-by-point (PBP) contact electroanatomical mapping. It remains unclear how PBP-derived LA scar correlates with multielectrode fast automated mapping (ME-FAM) derived scar. We aimed to correlate scar and bipolar voltages from LA maps created using PBP versus ME-FAM. Methods and Results: In consecutive patients undergoing repeat AF ablation, 2 separate LA maps were created using PBP and ME-FAM during sinus rhythm before ablation. Contiguous areas in the LA with a bipolar voltage cutoff of ≤0.2 mV represented dense scar; LA scar percentage was calculated for each map. Each LA shell was divided into 9 regions and each region further subdivided into 4 quadrants for additional analysis; mean voltages of all points obtained using PBP versus ME-FAM in each region were compared. Forty maps (20 PBP: mean 228.5 ± 95.6 points; 20 ME-FAM: 923.0 ± 382.6 points) were created in 20 patients. Mapping time with ME-FAM was shorter compared with PBP (13.3 ± 5.3 vs. 34.4 ± 13.1 minutes; P < 0.001). Mean LA scar percentage was higher with PBP compared with ME-FAM (15.5 ± 17.1{\%} vs. 12.8 ± 17.6{\%}; P = 0.04). Mean PBP voltage distribution was lower (compared with ME-FAM) in the septum (0.95 ± 0.73 vs. 1.46 ± 0.99 mV; P = 0.009), posterior wall (0.84 ± 0.42 vs. 1.40 ± 0.83 mV; P = 0.0008), roof (0.78 ± 0.80 vs. 1.39 ± 1.09 mV; P = 0.0003), and right PV–LA junction (0.34 ± 0.25 vs. 0.59 ± 0.50 mV; P = 0.01) regions, while voltages were similar in all other LA regions (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: In AF patients undergoing repeat ablation, bipolar voltage is greater in certain LA segments with ME-FAM compared with PBP mapping.",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, left atrial scar, mapping, scar mapping, voltage",
author = "Liang, {Jackson J.} and Elafros, {Melissa A.} and Daniele Muser and Pathak, {Rajeev K.} and Pasquale Santangeli and Supple, {Gregory E.} and Schaller, {Robert D.} and Frankel, {David S.} and Sanjay Dixit",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jce.13151",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "280--288",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Comparison of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage and Scar Using Multielectrode Fast Automated Mapping versus Point-by-Point Contact Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Repeat Ablation. / Liang, Jackson J.; Elafros, Melissa A.; Muser, Daniele; Pathak, Rajeev K.; Santangeli, Pasquale; Supple, Gregory E.; Schaller, Robert D.; Frankel, David S.; Dixit, Sanjay.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 280-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage and Scar Using Multielectrode Fast Automated Mapping versus Point-by-Point Contact Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Repeat Ablation

AU - Liang, Jackson J.

AU - Elafros, Melissa A.

AU - Muser, Daniele

AU - Pathak, Rajeev K.

AU - Santangeli, Pasquale

AU - Supple, Gregory E.

AU - Schaller, Robert D.

AU - Frankel, David S.

AU - Dixit, Sanjay

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Introduction: Bipolar voltage criteria to delineate left atrial (LA) scar have been derived using point-by-point (PBP) contact electroanatomical mapping. It remains unclear how PBP-derived LA scar correlates with multielectrode fast automated mapping (ME-FAM) derived scar. We aimed to correlate scar and bipolar voltages from LA maps created using PBP versus ME-FAM. Methods and Results: In consecutive patients undergoing repeat AF ablation, 2 separate LA maps were created using PBP and ME-FAM during sinus rhythm before ablation. Contiguous areas in the LA with a bipolar voltage cutoff of ≤0.2 mV represented dense scar; LA scar percentage was calculated for each map. Each LA shell was divided into 9 regions and each region further subdivided into 4 quadrants for additional analysis; mean voltages of all points obtained using PBP versus ME-FAM in each region were compared. Forty maps (20 PBP: mean 228.5 ± 95.6 points; 20 ME-FAM: 923.0 ± 382.6 points) were created in 20 patients. Mapping time with ME-FAM was shorter compared with PBP (13.3 ± 5.3 vs. 34.4 ± 13.1 minutes; P < 0.001). Mean LA scar percentage was higher with PBP compared with ME-FAM (15.5 ± 17.1% vs. 12.8 ± 17.6%; P = 0.04). Mean PBP voltage distribution was lower (compared with ME-FAM) in the septum (0.95 ± 0.73 vs. 1.46 ± 0.99 mV; P = 0.009), posterior wall (0.84 ± 0.42 vs. 1.40 ± 0.83 mV; P = 0.0008), roof (0.78 ± 0.80 vs. 1.39 ± 1.09 mV; P = 0.0003), and right PV–LA junction (0.34 ± 0.25 vs. 0.59 ± 0.50 mV; P = 0.01) regions, while voltages were similar in all other LA regions (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: In AF patients undergoing repeat ablation, bipolar voltage is greater in certain LA segments with ME-FAM compared with PBP mapping.

AB - Introduction: Bipolar voltage criteria to delineate left atrial (LA) scar have been derived using point-by-point (PBP) contact electroanatomical mapping. It remains unclear how PBP-derived LA scar correlates with multielectrode fast automated mapping (ME-FAM) derived scar. We aimed to correlate scar and bipolar voltages from LA maps created using PBP versus ME-FAM. Methods and Results: In consecutive patients undergoing repeat AF ablation, 2 separate LA maps were created using PBP and ME-FAM during sinus rhythm before ablation. Contiguous areas in the LA with a bipolar voltage cutoff of ≤0.2 mV represented dense scar; LA scar percentage was calculated for each map. Each LA shell was divided into 9 regions and each region further subdivided into 4 quadrants for additional analysis; mean voltages of all points obtained using PBP versus ME-FAM in each region were compared. Forty maps (20 PBP: mean 228.5 ± 95.6 points; 20 ME-FAM: 923.0 ± 382.6 points) were created in 20 patients. Mapping time with ME-FAM was shorter compared with PBP (13.3 ± 5.3 vs. 34.4 ± 13.1 minutes; P < 0.001). Mean LA scar percentage was higher with PBP compared with ME-FAM (15.5 ± 17.1% vs. 12.8 ± 17.6%; P = 0.04). Mean PBP voltage distribution was lower (compared with ME-FAM) in the septum (0.95 ± 0.73 vs. 1.46 ± 0.99 mV; P = 0.009), posterior wall (0.84 ± 0.42 vs. 1.40 ± 0.83 mV; P = 0.0008), roof (0.78 ± 0.80 vs. 1.39 ± 1.09 mV; P = 0.0003), and right PV–LA junction (0.34 ± 0.25 vs. 0.59 ± 0.50 mV; P = 0.01) regions, while voltages were similar in all other LA regions (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: In AF patients undergoing repeat ablation, bipolar voltage is greater in certain LA segments with ME-FAM compared with PBP mapping.

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - catheter ablation

KW - left atrial scar

KW - mapping

KW - scar mapping

KW - voltage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010653065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jce.13151

DO - 10.1111/jce.13151

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 280

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

T2 - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 3

ER -